GNU bug report logs - #57911
Abolish max-specpdl-size

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Mattias EngdegÄrd <mattias.engdegard <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 14:57:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Mattias EngdegÄrd <mattias.engdegard <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #61 received at 57911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 57911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, mattias.engdegard <at> gmail.com, michael.albinus <at> gmx.de,
 monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, visuweshm <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#57911: Abolish max-specpdl-size
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 19:36:31 +0300
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
> Cc: Visuwesh <visuweshm <at> gmail.com>,  57911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
>   mattias.engdegard <at> gmail.com,  michael.albinus <at> gmx.de,
>   monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 18:30:24 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > That's because you aren't subscribed to the list.  Messages posted by
> > people who aren't subscribed are held for moderation, and I need to
> > sleep sometimes, and when I do, I cannot approve messages...
> 
> Traditionally, mailing list software allows you to approve new posters
> once, and then let them through afterwards without manual intervention.
> And these days, with SPF/DKIM/DMARC, that's much safer than in The Olden
> Days, since it's next to impossible to forge mail these days (from
> domains that implement those things).
> 
> Doesn't the gnu.org mailing list software allow that?

They do.  I just don't use that option on emacs-devel, because it
would require to clean up the list if/when the person moves on and
stops posting actively.




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 296 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.