GNU bug report logs -
#57911
Abolish max-specpdl-size
Previous Next
Full log
Message #29 received at 57911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de> writes:
> Earlier today, I've got a message from you for moderator's approval. I
> did, and I have also checked the box to trust in you from now
> on. Hopefully, this is sufficient.
Here's the relevant Received headers for Mattias' that you're responding
to:
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54975 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces <at> debbugs.gnu.org>)
id 1oaJLD-000589-3E
for submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 12:09:51 -0400
Original-Received: from mail-lj1-f177.google.com ([209.85.208.177]:41743)
by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <mattias.engdegard <at> gmail.com>) id 1oaIoL-0001zv-Ao
for 57911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 11:35:53 -0400
So debbugs.gnu.org got the message at 11:35:53 -0400, but sent it along
12:09:51 -0400, which is half an hour later.
It seems like half of the messages lately are like this -- they take
everything between a couple of minutes and an hour to pass through the
mailing lists at gnu.org, and it's not just affecting people with
unknown/new mail addresses.
Could it be a high load situation at debbugs.gnu.org or something?
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 296 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.