GNU bug report logs - #57752
28.1.91; emacsclient-mail.desktop doesn't work for me

Previous Next

Full log

Message #32 received at 57752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: Damien Cassou <damien <at> cassou.me>, Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>,
 Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, git <at> mavit.org.uk, 57752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#57752: 28.1.91; emacsclient-mail.desktop doesn't work for me
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 12:09:07 +0200

>>>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 11:54:22 +0200, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> said:

    Lars> I've idly wondered before whether we should add a general mechanism for
    Lars> this to avoid having to create functions that look at
    Lars> `command-line-args-left' themselves.  (And --eval is problematic in
    Lars> circumstances like this.)

emacsclient interprets

    emacsclient arg1 arg2 --eval (form1) (form2) (form3)

as "send (form1), then (form2) then (form3), so by analogy this:

    Lars> --function foo --function-args bar zot gazonk

doesnʼt require a --function-args parameter

    Lars> would result in calling `foo' with those arguments.

    Lars> Hm...  would we need some way to say "here's the end of
    Lars> --function-args", perhaps?  "--"?  So:

and this also isnʼt necessary, since the end of args is implicit by
reaching the end of the arguments, same as '--eval'

    Lars> --function foo --function-args bar zot gazonk --

    Lars> Anybody have any thoughts here?

I idly wondered whether emacsclient could create a monster ʼ--evalʼ
form with a binding for `command-line-args-left', but then I started
having nightmares about string handling in C, so perhaps itʼs best to
just send stuff over to emacs and let server.el handle it :-)

Robert
-- 

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.