From unknown Tue Jun 24 17:27:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57583: Guix cannot resume after hibernation Resent-From: Yusuf Talha Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2022 16:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 57583 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 57583@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: Bug Guix Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.166230947122519 (code B ref -1); Sun, 04 Sep 2022 16:38:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2022 16:37:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45543 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUsd5-0005r9-9w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 12:37:51 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:41478) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUsd2-0005qz-Kq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 12:37:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55710) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUsd2-0008O9-Fi for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 12:37:48 -0400 Received: from w1.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.162]:59980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUsd0-00062v-NE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 12:37:48 -0400 Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72FF1FA013A for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2022 16:37:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1662309462; s=s1; d=tuta.io; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:Sender; bh=dEM4z6BofRHvKvv0piuu2aHjKVoky562q7470dekq+Y=; b=MOipk9tDcB40GiF8vFzxrl5mkIYtQvboUn8+CffUU0+CNqf1BU7lzoEYt4szo98E kXDXm3BJNT86chNsar0gFYXkCMxpkUjcYW+w05o8bvmyBuypJf++K/CxRbk/9lxcd62 JVZDTlXMzK7b5XOun7Y+gtniUsldwG0CnF3A1IAobhhZnaBPERGLw7SkDNyPMs6Erz+ e3C0259LU7u26jzW+b9MTsQEv872TDbTC2hYjMyZaoVHrQr3GsVqISTN4HeYoapqnKd KJbu1Joj0jHeCgx78n0OBXv1V12sBH13Iqxi8gZUt4kaXpidISaKhaWR5twVKAQPPi7 nXQLlJz2Fw== Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2022 18:37:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Yusuf Talha Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.162; envelope-from=yusuftalha@tuta.io; helo=w1.tutanota.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Hello.=C2=A0 I'm using Guix System on my Librebooted Thinkpad X200 laptop.= =C2=A0 Suspending to RAM works perfectly.=C2=A0 The problem is, when I run = "loginctl hibernate" it writes to the swap partition and powers off success= fully.=C2=A0 But when I try to boot up and resume from swap, it just ignore= s it and starts up like it wasn't hibernated before.=C2=A0 And also I have = to run "sudo swapon /dev/mapper/matrix-swapvol" to re-enable my swap partit= ion.=C2=A0 swapon says: "swapon: /dev/mapper/matrix-swapvol: software suspend data detected. Rewrit= ing the swap signature." I have added "resume=3D/dev/mapper/matrix-swapvol" to the kernel-arguments = list in config.scm. In addition to that, I see these messages on the dmesg log (I have no idea = what they mean): [=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0.068782] PM: hibernation: Registered nosave memory: [m= em 0x00000000-0x00000fff] [=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0.068788] PM: hibernation: Registered nosave memory: [m= em 0x000a0000-0x000fffff] [=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0.068791] PM: hibernation: Registered nosave memory: [m= em 0x7d74a000-0x7d7fffff] [=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0.068794] PM: hibernation: Registered nosave memory: [m= em 0x7d800000-0x93ffffff] [=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0.068796] PM: hibernation: Registered nosave memory: [m= em 0x94000000-0xefffffff] [=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0.068798] PM: hibernation: Registered nosave memory: [m= em 0xf0000000-0xf3ffffff] [=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0.068800] PM: hibernation: Registered nosave memory: [m= em 0xf4000000-0xffffffff] I haven't encountered this problem on any other distros.=C2=A0 You probably= realized that I encrypted my disk.=C2=A0 Hibernation wasn't working while = I was using Guix without encryption a few months ago either.=C2=A0 So I don= 't think LUKS is the problem here. I would be glad if you can help me with that.=C2=A0 Thanks in advance. From unknown Tue Jun 24 17:27:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57583: Guix cannot resume after hibernation Resent-From: Josselin Poiret Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2022 17:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57583 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Yusuf Talha , 57583@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 57583-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57583.166231197926837 (code B ref 57583); Sun, 04 Sep 2022 17:20:02 +0000 Received: (at 57583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2022 17:19:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45598 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUtHW-0006ym-Pq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 13:19:39 -0400 Received: from jpoiret.xyz ([206.189.101.64]:34218) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUtHV-0006ye-6P for 57583@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 13:19:37 -0400 Received: from authenticated-user (jpoiret.xyz [206.189.101.64]) by jpoiret.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 59ECD185300; Sun, 4 Sep 2022 17:19:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpoiret.xyz; s=dkim; t=1662311975; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LQExiqU1s9Wx2aMDAeEzRwn+tVOi4CvYzSW4JSNuyds=; b=suvGtlgzcXbLDLzW2gIMgk2HT4J9iTej/2MtatBrtwvLFTF845r80dsThnVwIC2RWJTNsC HvqEcTMqLBdCClYxejg6BPhrBP/NiwyDTBoRMpVElD0UAou3O926lxZHy/Vc9Qp9w9sWya /+CLVz7UqzRddRnAEMnbJWRTM+V2rd6pyHWILs8xv3upqoBQy0yVI0MW4frjbARgeP3S2Y RSlYHX5pCWev1lz6usRRcHcokdQkvXjnn3Hp6lQrCY2iTwK1ip1LgcAvSAbl0pFQbPT4/I jk3aJ2awBg2ZzBGUXr/X693IPhYBY3oTxYCLNng6fVLFu/e/iDMHj8IpiUOnqw== From: Josselin Poiret In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2022 19:19:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87bkrvawgp.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Authentication-Results: jpoiret.xyz; auth=pass smtp.auth=jpoiret@jpoiret.xyz smtp.mailfrom=dev@jpoiret.xyz X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Yusuf, Yusuf Talha via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes: > I haven't encountered this problem on any other =?UTF-8?Q?distros.=C2=A0?= You probably realized that I encrypted my =?UTF-8?Q?disk.=C2=A0?= Hibernation wasn't working while I was using Guix without encryption a few months ago eit [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 0.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Yusuf, Yusuf Talha via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes: > I haven't encountered this problem on any other =?UTF-8?Q?distros.=C2=A0?= You probably realized that I encrypted my =?UTF-8?Q?disk.=C2=A0?= Hibernation wasn't working while I was using Guix without encryption a few months ago eit [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: jpoiret.xyz (xyz)] 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 0.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Hi Yusuf, Yusuf Talha via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes: > I haven't encountered this problem on any other distros.=C2=A0 You probab= ly realized that I encrypted my disk.=C2=A0 Hibernation wasn't working whil= e I was using Guix without encryption a few months ago either.=C2=A0 So I d= on't think LUKS is the problem here. >From what I can tell, resuming from an encrypted partition isn't currently supported. This could potentially be done, though it's not my priority right now (and testing these kinds of features is dangerous, you could make a wrong move and incur heavy data loss). Best, --=20 Josselin Poiret From unknown Tue Jun 24 17:27:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57583: Guix cannot resume after hibernation Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 12:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57583 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Yusuf Talha Cc: 57583@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 57583@debbugs.gnu.org, bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.166238117629073 (code B ref -1); Mon, 05 Sep 2022 12:33:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2022 12:32:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46730 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oVBHb-0007Yr-RW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 08:32:56 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:40748) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oVBHa-0007Yj-9Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 08:32:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46016) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oVBHZ-0007xF-L4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 08:32:53 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:42902) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oVBHX-0004z1-Lu for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 08:32:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=/leHF34Qco/M5 II3RsgSPYsYM1ChqveOxYq3wFhWMuU=; h=in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to: from:references; d=tobias.gr; b=C1VkFdYgZpxVNwtd8MEPGqUwZAO8J38VPE+SWq HuWJq2lffxEAIObVq0/u/nkurBMpRciL+gotP9cvQzI8J19fb90bJcvFtDOKyekqvkXbU7 FyZv7HCxFnEOu+Lav+pgMD94J3tMdaBiCCnn5+n/ovKdHLsxP+jccQNaGGlQXDZOnnDZ3p bMhaYCQR8Ir9+1l7EO3H9GBQOASc0IrvTWlYu1go1M7mkic+SsBwqAaCTKAN807OnJPrP3 8oS0MZkjnA29G/RbNXrs7UEbU+FPUlA8kXmF/fcb0KrypHuAOGgcsG/gxDpGw33YaZcyv4 ullwlCvVHodZ+IqfdBwmwR1Q== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 8d50d0c3 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 12:32:45 +0000 (UTC) References: From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 14:13:05 +0200 In-reply-to: BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; Message-ID: <87a67egfvv.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Yusuf, Ludo', Josselin is right that resuming from encrypted swap isn't=20 supported. Yusuf Talha via Bug reports for GNU Guix =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Hibernation wasn't working=20 > while I > was using Guix without encryption a few months ago either. To have any hope of debugging this one, we'll need information. For example, what *exactly* did you specify as resume partition?=20 IIRC we try parsing it as /dev/name, UUID, or file system label=20 (almost certainly not in that order, obviously). In #guix, Ludovic recently noted the same in passing, but so far=20 has managed to dodge my pleas for moreinfo :-) Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCYxXslA0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15eCYBAOG4BoFXN84smDVA/GFzY6uS4HULDYaR/s2Q4ZSb FVTHAP4ujpzb2W2mRLGfGUxOIPGj2Kg55LSrN0oN59H68X0RDw== =kzMy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Tue Jun 24 17:27:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57583: Guix cannot resume after hibernation Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 12:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57583 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Josselin Poiret Cc: 49475@debbugs.gnu.org, 57583@debbugs.gnu.org, Yusuf Talha , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , jackhill@jackhill.us Received: via spool by 57583-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57583.166238233731104 (code B ref 57583); Mon, 05 Sep 2022 12:53:02 +0000 Received: (at 57583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2022 12:52:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46758 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oVBaG-00085Q-Sq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 08:52:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53284) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oVBa7-00084c-5s; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 08:52:06 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46310) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oVBa0-0000PX-VT; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 08:51:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=mOP4xYNwBhxQgQQOvSX9qLqr8pIRBEW9ZQecCFlCfxs=; b=QFTLemV0I8gp1ZAw5wAP cqBHo2gGU/8kQdGracaUGNaDQ6SOqQUyTH8/Z4L2DG6rdbjo2Co748DNFuQwgLQrQHxguOEIbiGZm nvjk0L88tmOW/IE+duW71n63Ba9QMDZUIfSWMcils3eX0TX5LqUqByYARY6wkLo8Cp/8Yb3vndN1g KMJLACz58rAckypAouRiqppG89k9InqLrW8iusZKaD4wVXR8Qxg0QaL8qVTwS0BKoADNmE346QMWB gMqUZxbtZmJuJQd1Id74x1CxUJwKzQFEkEawlusLWYejr7TRHRfSNBM2wZBZDpaT01RQvLTuzbg/u IVNVfTwmk+vmGA==; Received: from [193.50.110.177] (port=40420 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oVBa0-0004gh-Ie; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 08:51:56 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87bkrvawgp.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 14:51:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87bkrvawgp.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> (Josselin Poiret's message of "Sun, 04 Sep 2022 19:19:34 +0200") Message-ID: <87h71m3rx1.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) Hi, Josselin Poiret skribis: > Yusuf Talha via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes: > >> I haven't encountered this problem on any other distros.=C2=A0 You proba= bly realized that I encrypted my disk.=C2=A0 Hibernation wasn't working whi= le I was using Guix without encryption a few months ago either.=C2=A0 So I = don't think LUKS is the problem here. > >>>From what I can tell, resuming from an encrypted partition isn't > currently supported. This could potentially be done, though it's not my > priority right now (and testing these kinds of features is dangerous, > you could make a wrong move and incur heavy data loss). I believe this is fixed by this: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/49475 Jack, do I get it right? The patch in question fell through the cracks, but it actually LGTM. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Tue Jun 24 17:27:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57583: Guix cannot resume after hibernation Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 12:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57583 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Josselin Poiret Cc: 57583@debbugs.gnu.org, yusuftalha@tuta.io X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 57583@debbugs.gnu.org, Yusuf Talha , bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.166238242731276 (code B ref -1); Mon, 05 Sep 2022 12:54:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2022 12:53:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46768 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oVBbj-00088K-8A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 08:53:47 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:40306) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oVBbd-000887-9v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 08:53:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52738) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oVBbY-0004Os-SO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 08:53:34 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:45564) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oVBbR-0000l0-Ih for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 08:53:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=ghZsC6zrTUgfL H0gBgBMO3fkuqYVABvIOTZ10RLpeqM=; h=in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to: from:references; d=tobias.gr; b=L3JfAEzluHA1MZdG/lQ0alN9PUpZFz/tdIv+9Y 9W1kqCXqRkj01uCr7Lv6lLQo7JLgadTaUHwp/HHP5Z7MBzEpACfc9tfhs75QkIB7z3+DuP j7WE5+pdskkdJCOX5sri0bY5v9hRXyk6BU8WqTzBBtFoLRSTfK5oj333aGaOHeh2FrtG27 W1bQJzYuOvjIprpiqD1Bp65/pl2xKgYqHcNh8AdfrP3t/4e/+HZJW+WeSCEtmtUSpwynMU LfKInMrJCYD6j0gs3OW7ZrJBJPMp4U2MQHhpxyfjAIq8W+fdiNMUuh8mHsqOlT0Idc9Xjo GxkPr5dMzaRT2WY7TApz4egw== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 1d1aa1a5 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 12:53:18 +0000 (UTC) References: <87bkrvawgp.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 14:38:25 +0200 In-reply-to: <87bkrvawgp.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; Message-ID: <871qsqgexl.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi again, Josselin Poiret via Bug reports for GNU Guix =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > (and testing these kinds of features is=20 > dangerous, > you could make a wrong move and incur heavy data loss) I couldn't agree moEXT4-fs ext4_get_branch:171: inode #8: block=20 30343695: comm jbd2/sdb7-8: invalid block Aborting journal on device sdb7-8. =E2=80=A6ya know, I actually wrote a patch that I thought I'd submitted,=20 but apparently not? Or I'm failing to use Mumi again. We should scan all swap areas for the S1SUSPEND signature, and do=20 a much better thing than the current behaviour if we find one. I'll see if I can find it in a backup somewhEXT4-fs (sdb7):=20 Remounting filesystem read-only Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCYxXxZg0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15Na0BAOyMzF+/MeWvmcL0QLtFiVZYtVJsBJ6tvXrl9apN JXi7APwLmL6CLtCinI1oR+JExID5J9CQo5cGgxYnH+VmUCuXDg== =kYl7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Tue Jun 24 17:27:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57583: Guix cannot resume after hibernation Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 13:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57583 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 49475-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 57583@debbugs.gnu.org, Josselin Poiret , jackhill@jackhill.us, Yusuf Talha Received: via spool by 57583-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57583.1662383501726 (code B ref 57583); Mon, 05 Sep 2022 13:12:02 +0000 Received: (at 57583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2022 13:11:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46808 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oVBt3-0000BN-JG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 09:11:41 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:50102) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oVBsu-0000As-IZ; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 09:11:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=97krIzOMp9oPI /ztkxLsCb8uVypZGcHDcBFo6IJS8zc=; h=in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to: from:references; d=tobias.gr; b=Ae1iEhejxQKguDZ7xY6LeQSQGHcinjaXhFuohn gXyBU/CW20bpQnKohrgb0eGirAVATEdz8xRm+4ExASGVJxZ//5k3+xgs8k68NEwaEzonTu qI7PNsxdu1AFYPv0+kH0ioSdY5xyhdWJ9yMGmiHhyG0KfREP5XrRIO0tItInpwbZscO7fe qrGMoJRrXk9nI7WnL15n5ZqvwmRy9O+mN5ulvabANbe36FdBMSh/PX3U83O4nGDu6BufGi 1UDoW+ylYAaeESSJ/iiaspVaoWvC2rKI20ixjfKQQYLjUlsrnHJ6u+15KN8O+ZJ1cAAM8S nlm07BC0BQ+HQkUo3da6ljSA== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id dc206d3a (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 5 Sep 2022 13:11:22 +0000 (UTC) References: <87bkrvawgp.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> <87h71m3rx1.fsf@gnu.org> From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 15:05:16 +0200 In-reply-to: <87h71m3rx1.fsf@gnu.org> BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; Message-ID: <87wnaiezj2.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jack, Yusuf, Ludo', Yusuf: you could try pulling, reconfiguring, hibernating, and=20 resuming, if you're brave-ish. Ludovic Court=C3=A8s =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > I believe this is fixed by this: [=E2=80=A6] The patch in question fell > through the cracks It should and it had, sorry. I *dislike* the fact that this makes the resume path no longer=20 trivially obviously correct =E2=80=94 because we now actually do something= =20 potentially useful (and hence, dangerous) during it =E2=80=94 but that's=20 unavoidable I suppose. It's certainly not the fault of this=20 patch. Pushed as ec16f88522041dc285a35705ff9ee95672b78143, thanks Jack! Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCYxX1oQ0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW150cYA/3ZS6cUFlwn+9Q7MDVcWwHPe1Kbi4BHjtXrw5BZP ZS/fAQCId35XEGp8/W1LizS/imQg14KfTLyfPyddJ6Xs1hV2Dw== =uYzh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Tue Jun 24 17:27:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57583: References: In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Yusuf Talha Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2022 02:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57583 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 57583@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 57583-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57583.166243100316605 (code B ref 57583); Tue, 06 Sep 2022 02:24:01 +0000 Received: (at 57583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Sep 2022 02:23:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49246 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oVOFH-0004Jl-7w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 22:23:23 -0400 Received: from w1.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.162]:57338) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oVOF7-0004JP-8E for 57583@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 22:23:21 -0400 Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7F9FBF93B for <57583@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 02:23:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1662430987; s=s1; d=tuta.io; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:Sender; bh=s2Yp6AHxR6Ud6cgVIgGL/KPrtvMTm5XYDgYuEOekGLU=; b=vNOP8Y4vTtsUv0a1IPkKbaPtGb7QCTKz6Yc4xJDeL1OM7rFY4FuCEV/Le/mO4Vwy h9yXcP0Ln4L0FKcBOw4DtlZVr6IpkN7IVSEkq322dsYZU4soVEw95rd9Q7oWvYoZhgR nvwGgUBVM6lrxYJuyVLsOwYiIRi3sPglbNqc8e4sqVSakXPdQ8L+Dk3bdiirlY7LAiq vGQZqihMoM/X40OvEvMCnoeK7bpWoNG6bt4u4A7WEqulyYSmsfTMeE23w65iC+qSjsj VyWTIB5ZJh8Ek3G032jhRoPQO3G7+IJhOlHp3mr0mnxdwrvurPkoH9FXeP6Ir3BHrB3 bclJhCCZ+Q== Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 04:23:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Yusuf Talha Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I installed Guix again on unencrypted partition and now it =?UTF-8?Q?works.=C2=A0?= I guess I forgot to add necessary kernel arguments at the previous unencrypted =?UTF-8?Q?setup.=C2=A0?= Encryption decreased system's performance si [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 T_SPF_TEMPERROR SPF: test of record failed (temperror) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) I installed Guix again on unencrypted partition and now it works.=C2=A0 I g= uess I forgot to add necessary kernel arguments at the previous unencrypted= setup.=C2=A0 Encryption decreased system's performance significantly anywa= y... You know the best about what to do with this issue.=C2=A0 Thanks for your p= recious time. From unknown Tue Jun 24 17:27:16 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57583: Guix cannot resume after hibernation Resent-From: Mekeor Melire Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 01:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57583 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 57583@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: dev@jpoiret.xyz, ludo@gnu.org, me@tobias.gr, yusuftalha@tuta.io, 57583-done@debbugs.gnu.org, jackhill@jackhill.us X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: Josselin Poiret , bug-guix@gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , Yusuf Talha , 57583-done@debbugs.gnu.org, jackhill@jackhill.us Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16706349234065 (code B ref -1); Sat, 10 Dec 2022 01:16:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2022 01:15:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39602 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p3oSZ-00013V-BE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 20:15:23 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:38712) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p3oSX-00013P-VR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 20:15:22 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p3oSX-0005pG-NW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 20:15:21 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p3oSV-00026a-IU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 20:15:21 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8663A240101 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 02:15:17 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1670634917; bh=2oOFhGmZ42pu9fQGcTOnvT5wXJK/VjTJ4+0T8ici/f8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=Wy4d4Y5jEvg9ii+8aAiQrmNf5CI13tDi7dCZZJGJJURF5UCCqA0K/L4pTy99zxLoG wZFU4pEOEb6W2Qs7WZoqcDuLOKj9rZvd0+r/hEw6ZJPMOFy7f7XBTDaYkID9Pfq5kJ FaAyDBKPXU3v7y8tBwa7y5Gj6vEt8Yd7/lFXYvSnE47n1VU9weDuJo31LVpaI60ZuE drBoQ82g6/nX0e2cKsErIVoc1UKDnuyWWIxGpa4CVjeWTNt51Sy6CyIKOEYzboR+rx HSE+RrSfwejg5AV4HFhn3vWFFlXgCPYGG+xByLnq7fZEP6xI5izd9vm83o3BXzMtwf kBSZWkpF91q7g== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4NTVLT2Tz9z6tlh; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 02:15:13 +0100 (CET) References: <87bkrvawgp.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> <87h71m3rx1.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnaiezj2.fsf@nckx> From: Mekeor Melire Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 01:11:05 +0000 In-reply-to: <87wnaiezj2.fsf@nckx> Message-ID: <87h6y4oy92.fsf@posteo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=mekeor@posteo.de; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) 2022-09-05 15:05 bug-guix@gnu.org: > Jack, Yusuf, Ludo', > > Yusuf: you could try pulling, reconfiguring, hibernating, and resuming, if > you're brave-ish. I also use an X200 (but not with Libreboot, yet). I just tried out hibernation (I didn't even know I had to be brave for that :D) and it worked like a charm. So, I'll attempt to close this bug now. Feel free to re-open, if you're still experiencing the bug, Yusuf. > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > I believe this is fixed by this: [=E2=80=A6] The patch in question fell > > through the cracks > > Pushed as ec16f88522041dc285a35705ff9ee95672b78143, thanks Jack! From unknown Tue Jun 24 17:27:16 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Yusuf Talha Subject: bug#57583: closed (Re: bug#57583: Guix cannot resume after hibernation) Message-ID: References: <87h6y4oy92.fsf@posteo.de> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 57583 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 57583@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 01:16:03 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1670634963-4140-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1670634963-4140-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #57583: Guix cannot resume after hibernation which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 57583@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 57583: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D57583 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1670634963-4140-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 57583-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2022 01:15:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39606 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p3oSg-00013l-Lu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 20:15:31 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:34973) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p3oSb-00013L-V7 for 57583-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 20:15:29 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8AEA240027 for <57583-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 02:15:17 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1670634919; bh=2oOFhGmZ42pu9fQGcTOnvT5wXJK/VjTJ4+0T8ici/f8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=bvERKQMyVvKa0dX2nccyZbJW6qRqz5LJP79HIJRl78b6OqfQ7ylAczwTJ3lxBYlos z1926IRgzWBUh/BWSw1YdJMyhQBea4/afJNpFMW1l8/EgikhRqf+K+PPulti+RqeG1 MpM0GkLJQwGrgehKZbMrGQIxuC1chff/1Kueqhisk/cyd2CnTRKgVUpVOflhevDZBY spinu41RCedRzCUue2bUI/aWh2dFyjjc5U9FB75/+rguk7thPMYMJ9zmcgMDK88b8E 9yOh4tLOVocD/2jYuRanbu9qABC13SP59u7cicrXomWHBTl2hmA57/iTgiivZu1Xs0 364ddel9bYF7g== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4NTVLT2Tz9z6tlh; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 02:15:13 +0100 (CET) References: <87bkrvawgp.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> <87h71m3rx1.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnaiezj2.fsf@nckx> From: Mekeor Melire To: 57583@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#57583: Guix cannot resume after hibernation Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 01:11:05 +0000 In-reply-to: <87wnaiezj2.fsf@nckx> Message-ID: <87h6y4oy92.fsf@posteo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57583-done Cc: Josselin Poiret , bug-guix@gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , Yusuf Talha , 57583-done@debbugs.gnu.org, jackhill@jackhill.us X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) 2022-09-05 15:05 bug-guix@gnu.org: > Jack, Yusuf, Ludo', > > Yusuf: you could try pulling, reconfiguring, hibernating, and resuming, if > you're brave-ish. I also use an X200 (but not with Libreboot, yet). I just tried out hibernation (I didn't even know I had to be brave for that :D) and it worked like a charm. So, I'll attempt to close this bug now. Feel free to re-open, if you're still experiencing the bug, Yusuf. > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > I believe this is fixed by this: [=E2=80=A6] The patch in question fell > > through the cracks > > Pushed as ec16f88522041dc285a35705ff9ee95672b78143, thanks Jack! ------------=_1670634963-4140-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2022 16:37:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45543 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUsd5-0005r9-9w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 12:37:51 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:41478) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUsd2-0005qz-Kq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 12:37:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55710) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUsd2-0008O9-Fi for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 12:37:48 -0400 Received: from w1.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.162]:59980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUsd0-00062v-NE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 12:37:48 -0400 Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72FF1FA013A for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2022 16:37:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1662309462; s=s1; d=tuta.io; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:Sender; bh=dEM4z6BofRHvKvv0piuu2aHjKVoky562q7470dekq+Y=; b=MOipk9tDcB40GiF8vFzxrl5mkIYtQvboUn8+CffUU0+CNqf1BU7lzoEYt4szo98E kXDXm3BJNT86chNsar0gFYXkCMxpkUjcYW+w05o8bvmyBuypJf++K/CxRbk/9lxcd62 JVZDTlXMzK7b5XOun7Y+gtniUsldwG0CnF3A1IAobhhZnaBPERGLw7SkDNyPMs6Erz+ e3C0259LU7u26jzW+b9MTsQEv872TDbTC2hYjMyZaoVHrQr3GsVqISTN4HeYoapqnKd KJbu1Joj0jHeCgx78n0OBXv1V12sBH13Iqxi8gZUt4kaXpidISaKhaWR5twVKAQPPi7 nXQLlJz2Fw== Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2022 18:37:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Yusuf Talha To: Bug Guix Message-ID: Subject: Guix cannot resume after hibernation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.162; envelope-from=yusuftalha@tuta.io; helo=w1.tutanota.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Hello.=C2=A0 I'm using Guix System on my Librebooted Thinkpad X200 laptop.= =C2=A0 Suspending to RAM works perfectly.=C2=A0 The problem is, when I run = "loginctl hibernate" it writes to the swap partition and powers off success= fully.=C2=A0 But when I try to boot up and resume from swap, it just ignore= s it and starts up like it wasn't hibernated before.=C2=A0 And also I have = to run "sudo swapon /dev/mapper/matrix-swapvol" to re-enable my swap partit= ion.=C2=A0 swapon says: "swapon: /dev/mapper/matrix-swapvol: software suspend data detected. Rewrit= ing the swap signature." I have added "resume=3D/dev/mapper/matrix-swapvol" to the kernel-arguments = list in config.scm. In addition to that, I see these messages on the dmesg log (I have no idea = what they mean): [=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0.068782] PM: hibernation: Registered nosave memory: [m= em 0x00000000-0x00000fff] [=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0.068788] PM: hibernation: Registered nosave memory: [m= em 0x000a0000-0x000fffff] [=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0.068791] PM: hibernation: Registered nosave memory: [m= em 0x7d74a000-0x7d7fffff] [=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0.068794] PM: hibernation: Registered nosave memory: [m= em 0x7d800000-0x93ffffff] [=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0.068796] PM: hibernation: Registered nosave memory: [m= em 0x94000000-0xefffffff] [=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0.068798] PM: hibernation: Registered nosave memory: [m= em 0xf0000000-0xf3ffffff] [=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0.068800] PM: hibernation: Registered nosave memory: [m= em 0xf4000000-0xffffffff] I haven't encountered this problem on any other distros.=C2=A0 You probably= realized that I encrypted my disk.=C2=A0 Hibernation wasn't working while = I was using Guix without encryption a few months ago either.=C2=A0 So I don= 't think LUKS is the problem here. I would be glad if you can help me with that.=C2=A0 Thanks in advance. ------------=_1670634963-4140-1--