GNU bug report logs - #5754
Bytecomp Arithmetic test failed

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Juri Linkov <juri <at> jurta.org>

Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:52:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #32 received at 5754 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> jurta.org>
To: 5754 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Shigeru Fukaya <shigeru.fukaya <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#5754: Bytecomp Arithmetic test failed
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:08:45 +0300
I see that this was extensively discussed in bug#1334,
so I Cc:ed Shigeru Fukaya.  Shigeru, are you interested in
looking at the test failure reported by bytecomp-testsuite.el?

>> I tried to run some tests in the `test' subdir,
>> and `bytecomp-testsuite-run' in `test/bytecomp-testsuite.el' fails
>> on one test: (let ((a (expt 2 -1074)) (b 0.125)) (* a 8 b))
>> returns 5e-324 when evaluated by interpreter,
>> but after byte-compilation returns 0.0
>>
>> In GNU Emacs 24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) of 2010-03-23
>
> This bug is caused by optimization in byte-compilation
> that changes the order of function arguments.
>
> It byte-compiles
>
>   (let ((a (expt 2 -1074)) (b 0.125)) (* a 8 b))
>
> to
>
> 0	constant  expt
> 1	constant  2
> 2	constant  -1074
> 3	call	  2
> 4	constant  0.125
> 5	varbind	  b
> 6	varbind	  a
> 7	constant  *
> 8	varref	  a
> 9	varref	  b
> 10	constant  8
> 11	call	  3
> 12	unbind	  2
> 13	return
>
> where the order of arguments 8-10 is changed from (* a 8 b) to (* a b 8)
>
> For this test the different order of arguments changes
> the returned value:
>
> (funcall '* 5e-324 8 0.125)
> => 5e-324
>
> (funcall '* 5e-324 0.125 8)
> => 0.0

-- 
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/




This bug report was last modified 13 years and 169 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.