Subject: bug#57502: 29.0.50; Issue with `or' clause of buffer-match-p

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2022 14:10:50 +0300

> Cc: [email-masked]
> From: Philip Kaludercic <[email-masked]>
> Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2022 11:04:20 +0000
> 
> Are there any objections against applying this change?  From what I see
> pcase is used elsewhere in seq, so it should be possible to recognise
> and expand the macro, right?

I think we should avoid using pcase in subr.el, since subr.el is
loaded by loadup.el before pcase.  But I see that this ship has sailed
already, sigh.