Subject: Re: bug#5749: 24.0.50; Gomoku startup latency

From: Chong Yidong <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:18:59 -0400

YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <[email-masked]> writes:

> This is due to a behavioral change of `append-to-buffer', which used
> to preserve the point when the first argument coincides with the
> current buffer.

I've changed append-to-buffer to conform to the previous behavior.

Could someone check whether gomoku works properly now?