From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 23 10:42:19 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2022 14:42:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44785 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oQV6g-0000wH-Uf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 10:42:19 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60890) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oQV6g-0000w8-2e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 10:42:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53946) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQV6f-0006bl-Sh for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 10:42:17 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::430]:34773) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQV6e-00021z-6b for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 10:42:17 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id a4so17302996wrq.1 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 07:42:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=1lXQfweh5BR9zrtE16nOd1yQNYCuGI3HCPc4JEx9Ab8=; b=G5SYMpd7SWGLUcZd1QdgTmqaRZSk1nUhZ+yekNvyvz0D514o7qzI7skv0o7YBsbVDx k3W5EhEDMBxJnnoYYSFZZzc4PVgLFc57l+rAhcNsD0Y0+nWhbURfpTwaLFFmaQjAPnTC pqIKwrwMqH2pmuKXpW33shDG6qiKDo8fYpykZfHUK5mgomwvlZPIsxL6ZMxcr+OToTaP 3xuDl+XKI5A/akkfCYoR0ZrhTj0E3OS9WUgYv0pQwe8AcYmTta9cBbB4Ce64gwCHtVN2 qGHnYFFZAp1Y6KHOf398aFnf8rjxiOWxeRq8ISI0W1EVRevCb7AenGH/8EEIh+K+b4nG sxCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc; bh=1lXQfweh5BR9zrtE16nOd1yQNYCuGI3HCPc4JEx9Ab8=; b=ZVjE/vSaZN2S8PTUxV23G6RJDNPL4h2mPB8kWeBKCqOTDMpB/AD/DRPQkhQapygPk/ q+hZ8gYucbBySPT+CVqwvgUVVkTyTisArJ7kzRwB9s7uzW+iWTcMByvB7FbD8ZhBxzr7 DwVfBLVCt/aCNlTDxIS1RsbtcTNRn+D7zpmNyf7fmI4uQ9rwQvUT5yXa551uatlftPEb Us4aibtRxpN1RqbUcoxB2p9Vtq4Oi2MXdG1uB/tfnA0iNdn+PxGGpcHF3uP/I8mkdlhU WisffyI8yuiASliIl2fJd6HdeKRr9ISWiSy9zpWOqAbuOfFvGWmL8jg1aFbu6nu2Igo5 U8PQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0sfrXlxd91MjNRR4mC6FTvIAHp1fLB3WVGZhRWUr22QMpP8Mu8 dz+4f+pk0HwBuM/ye4rXi7/ip0neHmW44N1+Ej8jcgGdtLM14w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5WdVG4p+T0+N1Q19R/wQRF0qW27vlU9Rs8VV48pgF+qoTz1e4fswJqD8vgACuZx5EUVfEqXCcT97qtqvjXLJY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1861:b0:220:68e0:ac7e with SMTP id d1-20020a056000186100b0022068e0ac7emr14462564wri.376.1661265733864; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 07:42:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Michael Ford Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:42:03 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: libtool-2.4.7 removed as a "duplicate"? To: bug-guix@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f1d18705e6e991bb" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::430; envelope-from=fanquake@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x430.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --000000000000f1d18705e6e991bb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" In commit 5b6b731c7d8ecbae0ead1600b4cd2f70c66d51ca, the libtool-2.4.7 package was removed as a "duplicate". The commit message doesn't explain at all why libtool 2.4.7 was being removed, or what it was a duplicate of? As of latest master, libtool is still version 2.4.6. Thanks. --000000000000f1d18705e6e991bb Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In commit 5b6b731c7d8ecbae0ead1600b4cd2f70c66d51ca, t= he libtool-2.4.7 package was removed as a "duplicate". The commit= message doesn't explain at all why libtool 2.4.7 was being removed, or= what it was a duplicate of? As of latest master, libtool is still version = 2.4.6.

Thanks.
--000000000000f1d18705e6e991bb-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 01 09:02:32 2022 Received: (at 57356-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2022 13:02:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41541 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oTjq4-0006fG-Ek for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 09:02:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44156) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oTjq1-0006f2-Vz for 57356-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 09:02:30 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52090) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTjpw-0007y7-LG; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 09:02:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=qpViuam6gjBEqw4PnciwRFCDIi+lDC+quaWSr6IB7ow=; b=CmsCzeByu/rkbWgFdcMf g+Y77quChAMNi1MA14csuZPSthnAnT2QirLYk8cCCmIrbQiePun9ciQZCSP/tBLYXnPSOzL/TN5Am V31n8cY93PLQPD1J1s2WmiIJh5kiDkQbDRzYuC2GkmKK5atxifnYvN3T55/k1pHudDarKmgFRk4k9 voOAx3jeB01Y3GaVnW3/nmbXO2QihGZ7rg7E6bUSgZdra4qeqt6PUrPKisbbLzWPdiwtCPjia/kf8 M0uj89urounffT07lu/LpnDUcDlnYobAq4feNhRxsQjz2kyKYkdLp5UBsqkeQAq7mbWbixz29dGv4 GYKQCSMR5OEWjg==; Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201]:56428 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTjpw-0002cb-2y; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 09:02:24 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Michael Ford Subject: Re: bug#57356: libtool-2.4.7 removed as a "duplicate"? References: Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 15:02:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Michael Ford's message of "Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:42:03 +0100") Message-ID: <87a67j459e.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57356-done Cc: Marius Bakke , 57356-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Michael Ford skribis: > In commit 5b6b731c7d8ecbae0ead1600b4cd2f70c66d51ca, the libtool-2.4.7 > package was removed as a "duplicate". The commit message doesn't explain = at > all why libtool 2.4.7 was being removed, or what it was a duplicate of? As > of latest master, libtool is still version 2.4.6. Indeed, I think this commit was intended for =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99= , where =E2=80=98libtool=E2=80=99 *is* 2.4.7, and not for =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99. I=E2=80=99m reverting it on =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99. Marius, we=E2=80=99l= l have to make sure not to reintroduce it on the next merge into =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 01 10:35:35 2022 Received: (at 57356-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2022 14:35:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43820 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oTlI7-0003NY-2f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 10:35:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36410) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oTlI4-0003NM-Tz for 57356-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 10:35:33 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59646) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTlHz-00076e-Aw; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 10:35:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=mXoJwQOJRENLKW7BGYy7gxWPpDPx83GEFezEjDDv2/U=; b=sAQF5dgTT9yc5Z52FsaV hTU/fqpCRC5ofs6YXmoElc4JKt0e2zKPKzxnfYYR0ii7/0h5zfaiFA9+Xjyl50TsBpGGcQrFhPmo1 FPghklEcj5XjmBoNa0R88SnsCIui4tZrcoXO1Qp4N4wTzlKd+aiAnoF3J7QGoYysoHWf0NyGwBdwt 2MQJ3JNY+jMuRwFZV2suwKFqlYoalf+RPBoJkPysPRZwlMzLhHaSGfeA6CGiPQvMIlGBDQQuKwdhQ czOJEUNJtWzuimyQNcuogsiw2F/S7+5PvDmzfMkbHLD7WINA2WK+soYH1eM5MqJIoxEe9imHPY797 FudOv0RUvtkhFg==; Received: from [84.214.173.6] (port=43202 helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTlHs-0000h8-PF; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 10:35:22 -0400 From: Marius Bakke To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Michael Ford Subject: Re: bug#57356: libtool-2.4.7 removed as a "duplicate"? In-Reply-To: <87a67j459e.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a67j459e.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 16:35:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87tu5rb1sr.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57356-done Cc: 57356-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s skriver: > Hi, > > Michael Ford skribis: > >> In commit 5b6b731c7d8ecbae0ead1600b4cd2f70c66d51ca, the libtool-2.4.7 >> package was removed as a "duplicate". The commit message doesn't explain= at >> all why libtool 2.4.7 was being removed, or what it was a duplicate of? = As >> of latest master, libtool is still version 2.4.6. > > Indeed, I think this commit was intended for =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80= =99, where > =E2=80=98libtool=E2=80=99 *is* 2.4.7, and not for =E2=80=98master=E2=80= =99. > > I=E2=80=99m reverting it on =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99. Marius, we=E2=80= =99ll have to make sure not to > reintroduce it on the next merge into =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99. Whoops, sorry for the misunderstanding, and thanks for fixing me! :-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEARYKAC0WIQRNTknu3zbaMQ2ddzTocYulkRQQdwUCYxDDJQ8cbWFyaXVzQGdu dS5vcmcACgkQ6HGLpZEUEHfk5gEAt5iWbbI9DKgXF43gnit1f0SbrEsyX/o4lY0k R9rd3lQBAOmL5Ja4NV3nzBNC0RWPAyB/7gYtLZCS2w2uTOZAEz0B =/YYs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Mon Sep 08 15:20:43 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator