GNU bug report logs -
#57163
completing-read not allow cycling of the options by default
Previous Next
Reported by: uzibalqa <uzibalqa <at> proton.me>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 22:15:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: moreinfo
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
> Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2022 18:15:26 +0000
> From: uzibalqa <uzibalqa <at> proton.me>
> Cc: michael_heerdegen <at> web.de, 57163 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (user-error "End of defaults; no next item")
> > > signal(user-error ("End of defaults; no next item"))
> > > user-error("End of defaults; no next item")
> >
> >
> > Well, don't set debug-on-error, then.
> >
> > > After that, doing M-p gives [M-p is undefined]
> >
> >
> > Because you are in the debugger, in recursive-edit. Type C-] to exit
> > that.
>
> Should it be a user-error though?
A low-level API such as completing-read has no business in deciding
which errors are user-errors and which aren't. That's for the calling
application to decide.
> there any scheme to set another keybinding
> for `M-n` and `M-p` for things like completing-read? Being able to use [up] and
> [down] would be both convenient and intuitive (particularly people who use packages
> like company-mode), but cannot see that completing-read could allow that.
<UP> and <DOWN> arrow keys work here, they do the same as M-p and M-n.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 337 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.