GNU bug report logs - #57133
[PATCH] gnu: Add rizin.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #25 received at 57133 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net>
Cc: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> member.fsf.org>, 57133 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#57133: [PATCH] gnu: Add rizin.
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 15:49:48 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 15-08-2022 03:34, 宋文武 wrote:
>> You can put multiple licenses in the license field, using (license
>> (list this that foo bar ...)).
> For the license field, do we need to list all licenses of source code
> files, or the whole license of the package?  And if the later,
> `(list license:gpl2+ license:lgpl3+)` would say the package is dual
> licenses, under GPL2+ or LGPL3+ at user's choice.
>
> I think with all those licenses, the whole package is under
> GPL-3.0-or-later.
>
> Correct me if wrong, thank you!
I do not think it's stated anywhere which one exactly, but my own 
interpretation of the 'license' field is 'all the relevant licenses', 
without any claims whether it is a 'choose this or that' situation or a 
'one component is licensed as X, another is licensed as Y' situation.

Greetings,
Maxime.

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

[OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc (application/pgp-keys, attachment)]

[OpenPGP_signature (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.