GNU bug report logs - #57129
29.0.50; Improve behavior of conditionals in Eshell

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 02:44:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.0.50

Done: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #164 received at 57129 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org>
Cc: jporterbugs <at> gmail.com, larsi <at> gnus.org, eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu,
 bug-gnulib <at> gnu.org, 57129 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#57129: 29.0.50; Improve behavior of conditionals in Eshell
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 19:07:02 +0300
> From: Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org>
> Cc: eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu, bug-gnulib <at> gnu.org, larsi <at> gnus.org, 57129 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jporterbugs <at> gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 16:49:36 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii asked:
> > > Yes. Running the "case 2" part 1000 times again, among the 2000 generated
> > > file names, there are no duplicates — neither on 32-bit mingw, nor on 64-bit
> > > mingw.
> > 
> > Was that with or without using clock_gettime?  If it was with
> > clock_gettime, what happens without it (i.e. when 'clock' is used
> > instead)?
> 
> That was with clock_gettime. Without clock_gettime, i.e. without the
> dependency to libwinpthread, the result is the same: no duplicates — neither
> on 32-bit mingw, nor on 64-bit mingw.

Great, thanks.




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 129 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.