GNU bug report logs - #57116
cling: missing some system header files

Previous Next

Full log

Message #14 received at 57116 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>, Liliana Marie Prikler
 <liliana.prikler <at> ist.tugraz.at>
Cc: Gang Liang <randomizedthinking <at> gmail.com>, 57116 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#57116: cling: missing some system header files
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2022 11:43:03 +0200

Hi,

On Sat, 03 Sep 2022 at 00:25, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> Should we close it as 'notabug', or persist with the attempt to wrap the
> cling binary with the include paths required to ease its setup?

From my understanding about what cling is, we have a similar issue with
some others packages.  Bigloo does not work out of the box [1]:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix shell -C bigloo libunistring gcc-toolchain libgc pcre \
     -- bigloo /tmp/myfile.scm
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Idem for ghc (Haskell) which requires gcc-toolchain.  And I proposed [2]
to have <X>-toolchain for a ready-to-use X compiling toolsuite where
could be cling, ghc, bigloo, etc.

For instance, Debian has haskell-platform which includes all a regular
user needs for a regular Haskell development setup.  And we already
provide gcc-toolchain or clang-toolchain, or even gfortan-toolcahin,
gdc-toolchain, piet-toolchain, etc.  Therefore, we could also have
the package cling-toolchain propagating all the required packages that
we currently have to manually specify i.e. gcc-toolchain.

WDYT?


1: https://yhetil.org/guix/878rp3bs1a.fsf <at> gmail.com
2: https://yhetil.org/guix/CAJ3okZ0i0DjQMzgJ9WwzDC2tKc8WeTZxqW46KH+vq9zKbgBzhQ <at> mail.gmail.com


Cheers,
simon

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.