GNU bug report logs - #57090
'guix style' pretty-printer always renders integers as base10

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 20:52:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#57090: closed (Re: bug#57090: 'guix style' pretty-printer
 always renders integers as base10)
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 16:44:01 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#57090: 'guix style' pretty-printer always renders integers as base10

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 57090 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
57090: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=57090
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: "(" <paren <at> disroot.org>
Cc: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>,
 Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion <at> gmail.com>, 57090-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#57090: 'guix style' pretty-printer always renders integers
 as base10
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 18:43:22 +0200
Hi,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> skribis:

> Now, we could tweak the pretty printer so that it recognizes patterns
> where numbers or strings should be printed in a certain way.

I did that in c3b1cfe76b7038f4030d7d207ffc417fed9a7ead.  Lemme know how
you like it!  :-)

Ludo’.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: [BUG] Default Notation for chmod in guix style?
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:47:58 -0400
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,

I've noticed that, when I explicitly declare absolute permissions in
octal during a (chmod …) in my package definitions and then run guix
style, it converts them to decimal instead.

Is this intended? I've gotten feedback and agree that octal (#o755) is
much clearer to read than decimal (493), simply because I'm used to the
actual unix chmod tool and its conventions.

--

Christopher Rodriguez
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 258 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.