From unknown Sat Jun 14 19:09:28 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57090: [BUG] Default Notation for chmod in guix style? Resent-From: Christopher Rodriguez Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 20:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 57090 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 57090@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.166007829018707 (code B ref -1); Tue, 09 Aug 2022 20:52:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2022 20:51:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45227 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWCH-0004rf-SO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:51:30 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44436) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWCG-0004rV-2f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:51:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34242) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWCF-00079r-T0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:51:27 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]:41544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWCE-00047x-EX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:51:27 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id i13so1851879qkm.8 for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 13:51:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:user-agent:from:to:cc; bh=CCsYNH34iIlMataqAhOSab3a4RfEq2tH5syJxtONmSM=; b=VEQTwfDvLMOsP+6PjC7nEuvmehJqRdkdgt0wgEvocHjXfRORtQ+2OWFR9RBkl25oET DjwXa0zDuNSgpOeHvBhAfU1BptO8TTIR0OB55Xvk9G5TnI9hnkrMr3Bupn4HKnQ8ZrkE wFIGhlMpcQsIp8DiljzzflI3uL9JvXVRmUQodle3Evx984Lm+f7PsUwVZ+ShxyMmHMg5 FJonqzMw82Bf4z4QVPC81rkZFrDyLXD6d7Ukym1vsifjd9qsjxTLuFKBxsBd95LgFliS SeuuwTpJ86cYVF+vyg/WT/EyV2+UEaraobQdOFAXs3/9rped53PVDQTkg0m7ZTkKmQHQ PJJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:user-agent :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=CCsYNH34iIlMataqAhOSab3a4RfEq2tH5syJxtONmSM=; b=a43Yh2KOXM+ne12g9w+ueSi28XXOf/d4A8KYXBpqu1Hf6x460GNETf5hfjkBu9uVsP gjXqttyYBix/PGOY0zKjy6/OZv/WXoNwhH2Vp+0hrkRzEBPhSB8EjALvLIWbatsynZss +IY70k8FeV0mToTT10Nc59lSWzf8oxwQmmEgHzH8tnFqDDAAijQDryodgEeCF6yx+m8Q 9rqxrGiBYbHaAn4MYNIpUjegd/Q1j0Iugsjkzt6M4QGycukK/IQ0xpxPYeX2qxVpDXvS wdxlFOz9yeYj3KiAoiZHMSGfPJyTBXsBLx2ez8phKIj1E7vjH3G9zW0lK+yCeGkXLQIC Wcgg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1tkHQE7fgMM8qfTl9Kax3jeMVdqCRbz/KZV11VoEIqCRtOGvo7 RbsP3NJQJpaupcuaSveQVwWkwl1R3jw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4KOX3+0bqOuLOPRvydtQvTzFtnkwuA0gDFXM4HyUXHWVf0R8tthLIlPXY4nS37zBP4KKep6Q== X-Received: by 2002:a37:96c7:0:b0:6b9:3ca9:422 with SMTP id y190-20020a3796c7000000b006b93ca90422mr11214261qkd.101.1660078283848; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 13:51:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (ec2-44-193-71-234.compute-1.amazonaws.com. [44.193.71.234]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bq23-20020a05622a1c1700b0031eebfcb369sm10085353qtb.97.2022.08.09.13.51.23 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Aug 2022 13:51:23 -0700 (PDT) User-agent: mu4e 1.8.7; emacs 28.1 From: Christopher Rodriguez Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:47:58 -0400 Message-ID: <878rnxi1it.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::735; envelope-from=yewscion@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk1-x735.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I've noticed that, when I explicitly declare absolute permissions in octal during a (chmod =E2=80=A6) in my package definitions and then run guix style, it converts them to decimal instead. Is this intended? I've gotten feedback and agree that octal (#o755) is much clearer to read than decimal (493), simply because I'm used to the actual unix chmod tool and its conventions. =2D- Christopher Rodriguez --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEJMQbvYVxvZ0eF/84XZ6FgaGVz3sFAmLyyMoACgkQXZ6FgaGV z3umXA//b1FpJ7Kn6E58QWOFCr0sp0Dh0glJBiMWlAzuzmY+Z9dwK6tAi+K7ffNn WEm5+qV6lGOdwXJfNjgxlBSgnqSDz6TPCubhMXX4HBLrlWRG2Ql8An0n/kC/bjEV Tyh/JG5gPZHDMrVlaarrWQeFu1/dhmRDSMkLafez3u3LaO0sfH+rSm/10QFugdLa ClFIr0x+X+ZkCRGkrbQyV/y+A7cypnS3EwzGrr7Cf8GoolgII2R29gUADRGkGxDO gAGPOuJg1CXWC/0Jb14N0Koq5FbSnn7K7QUXlh0pPzCmv1UaIEYgrJcfvMgdzc8R SAS3QoDucQHP9yNa5KpMT6z89cpZjXNQ+GaDOxsEz+EpvzcTHpUZ4XkhkuGNO2C0 D1DWoXCl4AliLn4j7N7xkJqsdRpm08s+AbFW5/xf47DX+ItjAfrRn8YPGDKCkJz9 yeNctvFQd4oA81Na4O1sLcZzUSpAvKKnQg399/kXPU7quY/aQP6w8Zjd98XKk5h8 i1+JfacLN1gSd4fOz764uiQ1Hfiw3cHKfwPUMBQqgRxwazyr6lzLiDVbKVE6Nbvg nZLd04m1oZH9iiMoYluEX+cedapPXfCC6cscAnU+nTvS7aWhroCq8tcc0jaTJM2l jfY24oZxW5Nekqbgd3iBBEKahOyy8xbssH8q1sCjaTKP71fWxRw= =LYUE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Jun 14 19:09:28 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57090: [BUG] Default Notation for chmod in guix style? Resent-From: Maxime Devos Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 21:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57090 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Christopher Rodriguez , 57090@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org Received: via spool by 57090-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57090.166007876119962 (code B ref 57090); Tue, 09 Aug 2022 21:00:02 +0000 Received: (at 57090) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2022 20:59:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45249 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWJt-0005Bu-0O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:59:21 -0400 Received: from albert.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.90]:36218) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWJq-0005Bg-4L for 57090@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:59:18 -0400 Received: from [IPV6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:5dba:d409:33f7:a16] ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:5dba:d409:33f7:a16]) by albert.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id 5YzG2800X20ykKC06YzG1P; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 22:59:16 +0200 Message-ID: <3f031a26-5835-e4ac-d8e5-ed725d8b1633@telenet.be> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 22:59:11 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0 Content-Language: en-US References: <878rnxi1it.fsf@gmail.com> From: Maxime Devos In-Reply-To: <878rnxi1it.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------ZtPyiqNfC1XjbttIXZUz6O5p" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22; t=1660078756; bh=xzjTwtDin2nPd2kwqLlI+5s9lYaXsEJAv64k3Ah9gHk=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=h6BeAX+d1mDU+khjeGVgD5P59IfhKCXlfORkHn3hBppiLCh5gvcaZwx8oChQs3hNx 0+V0RCWw2Iz53fnrDhmt8XAI/CNxkVeCkbPsVtSArlTHaaswVuU95IXV29ZUA862sB +TSgfyW67sMamHHT72hNXJhWD3PcYAvJKHSbEuq4/69CsyJX41nEAIk9tGYWZyGy1q M8k9AP8Zi0HhHOt1Xc+vBJSS4nhWoLM2/KOcXD0Vp0nVv5GSxlJKgZh0IVYv2beWDA KOjYe/i/IWR54oT6g4/yOBy3DQHtQ0C0leuByfAwwmfF1McUR4ZObUIN9SIxMMFGVp DTlvOFuBNafaA== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------------ZtPyiqNfC1XjbttIXZUz6O5p Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------0xsa9PvNSfalKj9Yg9eN2HdG"; protected-headers="v1" From: Maxime Devos To: Christopher Rodriguez , 57090@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org Message-ID: <3f031a26-5835-e4ac-d8e5-ed725d8b1633@telenet.be> Subject: Re: bug#57090: [BUG] Default Notation for chmod in guix style? References: <878rnxi1it.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <878rnxi1it.fsf@gmail.com> --------------0xsa9PvNSfalKj9Yg9eN2HdG Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------ep80yEyJEmhMeaRjYJzk0GwN" --------------ep80yEyJEmhMeaRjYJzk0GwN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Tm90ZTogTm8gbmVlZCBmb3IgW0JVR10gcHJlZml4ZXMgLS0gdGhleSBhcmUgcHJlZml4ZWQg YXV0b21hdGljYWxseSBieSANCmJ1ZyNOTk5OTiBhbmQgdGhlIGJ1ZyB0cmFja2VyIGlzIGVp dGhlciBmb3IgYnVncyBvciBwYXRjaGVzLCBhbmQgdGhlIA0KbGF0dGVyIGhhcyB0aGUgW1BB VENIIC4uLl0gY29udmVudGlvbi4gTm8gaGFybSB0aG91Z2guDQoNCk9uIDA5LTA4LTIwMjIg MjI6NDcsIENocmlzdG9waGVyIFJvZHJpZ3VleiB3cm90ZToNCj4gSGVsbG8sDQo+DQo+IEkn dmUgbm90aWNlZCB0aGF0LCB3aGVuIEkgZXhwbGljaXRseSBkZWNsYXJlIGFic29sdXRlIHBl cm1pc3Npb25zIGluDQo+IG9jdGFsIGR1cmluZyBhIChjaG1vZCDigKYpIGluIG15IHBhY2th Z2UgZGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgYW5kIHRoZW4gcnVuIGd1aXgNCj4gc3R5bGUsIGl0IGNvbnZlcnRz IHRoZW0gdG8gZGVjaW1hbCBpbnN0ZWFkLg0KPg0KPiBJcyB0aGlzIGludGVuZGVkPyBJJ3Zl IGdvdHRlbiBmZWVkYmFjayBhbmQgYWdyZWUgdGhhdCBvY3RhbCAoI283NTUpIGlzDQo+IG11 Y2ggY2xlYXJlciB0byByZWFkIHRoYW4gZGVjaW1hbCAoNDkzKSwgc2ltcGx5IGJlY2F1c2Ug SSdtIHVzZWQgdG8gdGhlDQo+IGFjdHVhbCB1bml4IGNobW9kIHRvb2wgYW5kIGl0cyBjb252 ZW50aW9ucy4NCj4NCj4gLS0NCj4NCj4gQ2hyaXN0b3BoZXIgUm9kcmlndWV6DQoNCidjaG1v ZCcgaXMgbm90IG1lbnRpb25lZCBhbnl3aGVyZSBpbiAoZ3VpeCBzY3JpcHRzIHN0eWxlKSwg c28gSSdkIHRoaW5rIA0KaXQncyBqdXN0IGFuIG92ZXJzaWdodC4gVGhlIGF1dGhvcml0eSBv biB0aGUgbWF0dGVyIHdvdWxkIGJlIEx1ZG92aWMgDQpDb3VydMOocyA8bHVkb0BnbnUub3Jn Pg0KDQpEaXNjbGFpbWVyOiBJJ20gdGhlIG9uZSB0aGF0IHdyb3RlIHRoYXQgZmVlZGJhY2su IExldCdzIG5vdCBkb3VibGUtY291bnQgDQpteSBub24tZXhpc3RlbnQgJ3ZvdGVzJy4NCg0K R3JlZXRpbmdzLA0KTWF4aW1lDQoNCg== --------------ep80yEyJEmhMeaRjYJzk0GwN Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP public key Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- xjMEX4ch6BYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdANPb/d6MrGnGi5HyvODCkBUJPRjiFQcRU5V+m xvMaAa/NL01heGltZSBEZXZvcyA8bWF4aW1lLmRldm9zQHN0dWRlbnQua3VsZXV2 ZW4uYmU+wpAEExYIADgWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCX4ch6AIbAwUL CQgHAwUVCgkICwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7japAQC3opZ2KGWzWmRc /gIWSu0AAcfMwyinFEEPa/QhUt2CogD/e2RdF4CYAgaRHJJmZ9WU7piKbLZ7llB4 LzgezVDHggzNJU1heGltZSBEZXZvcyA8bWF4aW1lZGV2b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZT7C kAQTFggAOBYhBMHzPuIMUo/bfdcBH0nj7iIZFyXuBQJf56ycAhsDBQsJCAcDBRUK CQgLBRYCAwEAAh4BAheAAAoJEEnj7iIZFyXujpQBAKV1SwDDl4f24rXciDlB9L8W ycZt30CgbewMSRQk4mvbAP9dFMbVVixYBd6C8cfhR+NsOBGiOJnQABlUmgNuqGFJ Dc44BF+HIegSCisGAQQBl1UBBQEBB0BOlzIWiJzgobMF6/cqwLaLk7jIcFSZ++c0 k9cCNT6YXwMBCAfCeAQYFggAIBYhBMHzPuIMUo/bfdcBH0nj7iIZFyXuBQJfhyHo AhsMAAoJEEnj7iIZFyXuMr0BAJc8cl5PGvVmVuSQVKjleNl4DK1/XAaPAYPe34AE fZJPAP9IqLCQhH/FeJanHqBP8gNdGNI2qn8RnnLVfRJgUjZ1BA=3D=3D =3DOVqp -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --------------ep80yEyJEmhMeaRjYJzk0GwN-- --------------0xsa9PvNSfalKj9Yg9eN2HdG-- --------------ZtPyiqNfC1XjbttIXZUz6O5p Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnsEABYIACMWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYvLKnwUDAAAAAAAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7hEf AQDB8V3ppIEiT3eecvd5DGYGcT5wCwYNbOmHnJx1QdM9lwEAsiC/lHdjZ0Lsu9YFMgDYqwexjxS5 L5aevvWB9fyp7Qs= =jadR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------ZtPyiqNfC1XjbttIXZUz6O5p-- From unknown Sat Jun 14 19:09:28 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57090: [BUG] Default Notation for chmod in guix style? Resent-From: Csepp Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 21:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57090 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Christopher Rodriguez Cc: 57090@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org, 57090@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.166007907129196 (code B ref -1); Tue, 09 Aug 2022 21:05:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2022 21:04:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45260 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWOt-0007an-27 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:04:31 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:50604) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWOq-0007aY-JG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:04:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37212) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWOq-0004X9-Ep for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:04:28 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:42650) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWOn-0006Ai-69 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:04:27 -0400 Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4M2QYM3R1czDqVX; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 21:04:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1660079063; bh=Nkvqayy8MTSBXw2LnTWfLCNBWH+XNhGB0fRt5+E3n8E=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From; b=h5aq0PQCjzJX4xOlsXGRO36CiTWF4pYfJn5+pMt0oANobeO7bxDbGZPlTVL2ui0ib WH3TB5qVxlDQEdJtls0OEybAC1s+YERUPNwNFWQRn0i2ZJhNl5UR/Eeyy0A825KwZ6 kq9Wta2xbQ7GDilEezaQsps5IhfnKLefSDOip9OI= X-Riseup-User-ID: 2D85D353C1025928FBE34D253CF982BB6A80BDD9713ED8183ECF1030BA3E8DD6 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4M2QYL54yhz1yWw; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 21:04:22 +0000 (UTC) References: <878rnxi1it.fsf@gmail.com> From: Csepp Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 21:01:15 +0000 In-reply-to: <878rnxi1it.fsf@gmail.com> Message-ID: <87wnbhf7sd.fsf@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=raingloom@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Christopher Rodriguez writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > > Hello, > > I've noticed that, when I explicitly declare absolute permissions in > octal during a (chmod =E2=80=A6) in my package definitions and then run g= uix > style, it converts them to decimal instead. > > Is this intended? I've gotten feedback and agree that octal (#o755) is > much clearer to read than decimal (493), simply because I'm used to the > actual unix chmod tool and its conventions. Seems to be a Scheme limitation: ``` scheme@(guile-user)> '(#o10) $1 =3D (8) ``` From unknown Sat Jun 14 19:09:28 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57090: [BUG] Default Notation for chmod in guix style? Resent-From: "(" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 21:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57090 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "Maxime Devos" , "Christopher Rodriguez" , <57090@debbugs.gnu.org>, Received: via spool by 57090-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57090.166007907729229 (code B ref 57090); Tue, 09 Aug 2022 21:05:02 +0000 Received: (at 57090) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2022 21:04:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45265 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWOz-0007bN-KO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:04:37 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:42404) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWOw-0007b7-WF for 57090@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:04:35 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F87840E32; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 23:04:33 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with UTF8SMTP id BFSXn_VA7pWd; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 23:04:32 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1660079069; bh=iPc1tw2jRPsRUrOOgYtWclSlwEXhOq+ojlroqCFFdCw=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To; b=OJrtGaxA6/dveh/oWN3KRPqG/a4YC0mjInNBLfnWrGPBhYFogbAH4sRs9D197XhfH goje/asmrRsykrGMoefrDOaMVhlE7IVjA9rER08ibxShgLmdGDFwL61i/pLmvDGYGk E1DOOmcwxzNFjSdawDyir9kYYu/JaQ07Wle+8Sr9glGjcVhQ7atF47n2CFzAosvr7A ISQGaVjZ2Mw5i5m1F+mHm/fdaWYowqdNqwWQEtzrKwHtVhIqv7Mh0Isn/rcATVUhhN PZBK30/gY7hOEOWPsJk1anxzyvCHg+J63aDDDF3PLksUDdAl522gWQZ8HvpkMvKKdo 2zQ/MQmDBEnCQ== Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 22:04:24 +0100 Message-Id: From: "(" References: <878rnxi1it.fsf@gmail.com> <3f031a26-5835-e4ac-d8e5-ed725d8b1633@telenet.be> In-Reply-To: <3f031a26-5835-e4ac-d8e5-ed725d8b1633@telenet.be> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Tue Aug 9, 2022 at 9:59 PM BST, Maxime Devos wrote: > 'chmod' is not mentioned anywhere in (guix scripts style), so I'd think= =20 > it's just an oversight. The authority on the matter would be Ludovic=20 > Court=C3=A8s Is it possible that (guix read-print) stores octal numbers directly as Scheme numbers, with no way to distinguish them from decimal numbers, which means when they are printed they are just treated as base10? I poked around a bit in the module but couldn't find the code for number reading. -- ( From unknown Sat Jun 14 19:09:28 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57090: [BUG] Default Notation for chmod in guix style? Resent-From: "(" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 21:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57090 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "Csepp" , "Christopher Rodriguez" Cc: 57090@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 57090-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57090.166007933829974 (code B ref 57090); Tue, 09 Aug 2022 21:09:02 +0000 Received: (at 57090) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2022 21:08:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45281 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWTB-0007nN-Na for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:08:57 -0400 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:45414) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWTA-0007nD-C4 for 57090@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:08:56 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A2C40D3B; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 23:08:55 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fQZYd_2g2yZA; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 23:08:54 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1660079334; bh=bUqYa5FaJQMlrZp5ZghDa2zgEguazQLplP7RSNLuRg8=; h=Date:Cc:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To; b=KR0x7SQQyXOGHmSesvl6bWj34b7uPzoCjTOo0XJaNNsQdzPEtY2jdyp708fReFuwl rggO8rvvf/EM+u8Oz+lYUEjGgMPBSZtDXHSFw2/C9N/YoN985rN8QJHHmSCJVi7v2H 68JZDQwFWpGGJ0xR9fHtO7XSCpFu4QBBlCvF5HvAztGPtkv65offHqjHs1mcKLcsAX 7C9mJquzO36xnz3KpCCjJzNP3WzHGZwPvuihCxhR9XeV+9fcMNUQe2cX8jg2aMWZl4 QAbYD9516EcdFnz/LvOg9CCoJ4Cljq5guWtMdb+Usbd3LNZhuge4/H+dCl3xukTkrr U4ofk9f9TmQuw== Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 22:08:53 +0100 Message-Id: From: "(" References: <878rnxi1it.fsf@gmail.com> <87wnbhf7sd.fsf@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: <87wnbhf7sd.fsf@riseup.net> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Tue Aug 9, 2022 at 10:01 PM BST, Csepp wrote: > Seems to be a Scheme limitation: > > ``` > scheme@(guile-user)> '(#o10) > $1 =3D (8) > ``` `guix style` uses a completely seperate reader, defined in (guix read-print), so even though it's possible it has the same limitation, we could easily modify it to support octal/hexadecimal/binary numbers. -- ( From unknown Sat Jun 14 19:09:28 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#57090: [BUG] Default Notation for chmod in guix style? Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 21:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57090 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "(" Cc: 57090@debbugs.gnu.org, Christopher Rodriguez , Maxime Devos Received: via spool by 57090-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57090.166007955230580 (code B ref 57090); Tue, 09 Aug 2022 21:13:01 +0000 Received: (at 57090) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2022 21:12:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45288 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWWe-0007x9-7s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:12:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54310) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWWc-0007wo-1i for 57090@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:12:30 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47408) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWWW-0007YA-RU; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:12:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=Gd7z3aZcFnoi5uVs2dUw7fKkVit2ItFmHRy5NLR3+cc=; b=iDRPUBFpBCb4oIz2F6H4 nc6KF4EA8IN34+1ToFt1rDAZtNprQX9v8zs1KiTChT6BushJA/ybfscDQ+RVQQPrd1jLXo8YU0CTl QLpBR0W4r2WSgX+4eWIXWjHBxy8U+ZIbbjhOJHN1f/iiJZq92stjmnRSAF0vIBprPlS7C9/56wO43 5prNsRG0cJy6u8vC+8ljRMvHaPDqcNMf/ijg3I+cQCxBW5sFhbBdoXfP7VVWDXJhdeed+lvIwGPv5 RSWCvnb7NREzuJC47rTRGvOOhr//NrNPGLAFyqQNPZBM9E4V6njHmgUOL54PtdxS/O8Z3RqTAkAPt 6U1kvmNlTWU74g==; Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201]:50892 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWWT-0007rd-Mm; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 17:12:24 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <878rnxi1it.fsf@gmail.com> <3f031a26-5835-e4ac-d8e5-ed725d8b1633@telenet.be> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 23:12:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: (paren@disroot.org's message of "Tue, 09 Aug 2022 22:04:24 +0100") Message-ID: <87czd92kaz.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, "(" skribis: > On Tue Aug 9, 2022 at 9:59 PM BST, Maxime Devos wrote: >> 'chmod' is not mentioned anywhere in (guix scripts style), so I'd think= =20 >> it's just an oversight. The authority on the matter would be Ludovic=20 >> Court=C3=A8s > > Is it possible that (guix read-print) stores octal numbers directly as > Scheme numbers, with no way to distinguish them from decimal numbers, > which means when they are printed they are just treated as base10? I > poked around a bit in the module but couldn't find the code for number > reading. Indeed, the reader is basically a wrapper around =E2=80=98read=E2=80=99. I= t preserves comments and vertical space, but it doesn=E2=80=99t attempt to preserve the style of numbers (base, etc.), strings (whether \n & co. are escaped or literal), and so on. I think that=E2=80=99d be a bit too much honestly. Now, we could tweak the pretty printer so that it recognizes patterns where numbers or strings should be printed in a certain way. Help welcome! :-) Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 31 05:20:56 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Aug 2022 09:20:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38198 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oTJu4-00069j-JS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 05:20:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39480) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oTJu1-00069S-JO for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 05:20:55 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54028) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTJtw-00059K-4M for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 05:20:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:Subject:From:To:Date:in-reply-to: references; bh=/ycSOnLO+g43UI6u1hdEVkaBBo7Axc2PTCv/UUxRc1c=; b=d4qXxmbZn6n2Cc B5fBwu52TKmUVdzSq7AgEpXl34JIvh64lM05PXeqp8U7GqcIH8v321eLs5endzXJQBlGAk1WyPJ8W YhhPupqJC5cpfQ7QEsPv4mDUPua4ZiMwKsNJx2kh8smTYVYGaqKPN0SMVmtWM4oKl2vdEnRWMwI+F sgiZ8v9ENw2G8lif37r0dFgaN+QKA/qAGP/7axG1gFaHCAwBC/IMkGghtoJhmpaWajDjxNGRWu19L 2s9IO1Q+nWtNQLNI0bPtygdVsgo3mGmm6kepdLVQXGyaE8J+RSdGTaYhmNz+7yAVzTZr+GlfYyOtK AAIPrJIkqKsALDOLZ+DQ==; Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201]:56482 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTJtp-0000ek-HS for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 05:20:45 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:20:37 +0200 Message-Id: <87zgfkdb16.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: control message for bug #57090 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) retitle 57090 'guix style' pretty-printer always renders integers as base10 quit From unknown Sat Jun 14 19:09:28 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Christopher Rodriguez Subject: bug#57090: closed (Re: bug#57090: 'guix style' pretty-printer always renders integers as base10) Message-ID: References: <87k06nyrit.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <878rnxi1it.fsf@gmail.com> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 57090 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 57090@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 16:44:01 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1662050641-26177-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1662050641-26177-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #57090: 'guix style' pretty-printer always renders integers as base10 which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 57090@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 57090: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D57090 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1662050641-26177-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 57090-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2022 16:43:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44021 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oTnHv-0006nP-8B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 12:43:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37248) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oTnHt-0006nC-Nh for 57090-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 12:43:30 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59126) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTnHo-0004J0-Ft; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 12:43:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=9R/BL14+FMsAIGtgIRLEoWLBhaIcwYbWDlW+wV45iPU=; b=i5X2crumAuVyYjpoFD2d V9dMxUXmqm1nmFK1ecMgBT51dOzapQH7tNq2reMbKqgADvc6PIAcjwVvJ0wTqd59curawauXssnTO 8ZatM8uUJrOrJmL06L7LPOHWLZA99I+/wIhx8YLiPVRHAF+PEp2+EBkmdr78niYcTxVN1m0/aQdRI SaXeioTsw2K8G6BFYjP0zdSCFzlaM/u4t8wEjKqXaP18urNtceCMnXG2GauMdyyeMmFjkEL9G0qfQ SqWnDHVrYfniL/Zxoi8Z8OEwweP+JQMDnlmBIgR4EhCgVTk0rEroXWSzbul3wUQEI7kixBf8NcUDo JzciU8xRcC90UQ==; Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201]:57082 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTnHo-0000CX-2j; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 12:43:24 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: "(" Subject: Re: bug#57090: 'guix style' pretty-printer always renders integers as base10 References: <878rnxi1it.fsf@gmail.com> <3f031a26-5835-e4ac-d8e5-ed725d8b1633@telenet.be> <87czd92kaz.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 18:43:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87czd92kaz.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Tue, 09 Aug 2022 23:12:20 +0200") Message-ID: <87k06nyrit.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 57090-done Cc: Maxime Devos , Christopher Rodriguez , 57090-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s skribis: > Now, we could tweak the pretty printer so that it recognizes patterns > where numbers or strings should be printed in a certain way. I did that in c3b1cfe76b7038f4030d7d207ffc417fed9a7ead. Lemme know how you like it! :-) Ludo=E2=80=99. ------------=_1662050641-26177-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2022 20:51:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45227 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWCH-0004rf-SO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:51:30 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44436) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWCG-0004rV-2f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:51:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34242) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWCF-00079r-T0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:51:27 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]:41544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oLWCE-00047x-EX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:51:27 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id i13so1851879qkm.8 for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 13:51:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:user-agent:from:to:cc; bh=CCsYNH34iIlMataqAhOSab3a4RfEq2tH5syJxtONmSM=; b=VEQTwfDvLMOsP+6PjC7nEuvmehJqRdkdgt0wgEvocHjXfRORtQ+2OWFR9RBkl25oET DjwXa0zDuNSgpOeHvBhAfU1BptO8TTIR0OB55Xvk9G5TnI9hnkrMr3Bupn4HKnQ8ZrkE wFIGhlMpcQsIp8DiljzzflI3uL9JvXVRmUQodle3Evx984Lm+f7PsUwVZ+ShxyMmHMg5 FJonqzMw82Bf4z4QVPC81rkZFrDyLXD6d7Ukym1vsifjd9qsjxTLuFKBxsBd95LgFliS SeuuwTpJ86cYVF+vyg/WT/EyV2+UEaraobQdOFAXs3/9rped53PVDQTkg0m7ZTkKmQHQ PJJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:user-agent :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=CCsYNH34iIlMataqAhOSab3a4RfEq2tH5syJxtONmSM=; b=a43Yh2KOXM+ne12g9w+ueSi28XXOf/d4A8KYXBpqu1Hf6x460GNETf5hfjkBu9uVsP gjXqttyYBix/PGOY0zKjy6/OZv/WXoNwhH2Vp+0hrkRzEBPhSB8EjALvLIWbatsynZss +IY70k8FeV0mToTT10Nc59lSWzf8oxwQmmEgHzH8tnFqDDAAijQDryodgEeCF6yx+m8Q 9rqxrGiBYbHaAn4MYNIpUjegd/Q1j0Iugsjkzt6M4QGycukK/IQ0xpxPYeX2qxVpDXvS wdxlFOz9yeYj3KiAoiZHMSGfPJyTBXsBLx2ez8phKIj1E7vjH3G9zW0lK+yCeGkXLQIC Wcgg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1tkHQE7fgMM8qfTl9Kax3jeMVdqCRbz/KZV11VoEIqCRtOGvo7 RbsP3NJQJpaupcuaSveQVwWkwl1R3jw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4KOX3+0bqOuLOPRvydtQvTzFtnkwuA0gDFXM4HyUXHWVf0R8tthLIlPXY4nS37zBP4KKep6Q== X-Received: by 2002:a37:96c7:0:b0:6b9:3ca9:422 with SMTP id y190-20020a3796c7000000b006b93ca90422mr11214261qkd.101.1660078283848; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 13:51:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (ec2-44-193-71-234.compute-1.amazonaws.com. [44.193.71.234]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bq23-20020a05622a1c1700b0031eebfcb369sm10085353qtb.97.2022.08.09.13.51.23 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Aug 2022 13:51:23 -0700 (PDT) User-agent: mu4e 1.8.7; emacs 28.1 From: Christopher Rodriguez To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: [BUG] Default Notation for chmod in guix style? Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:47:58 -0400 Message-ID: <878rnxi1it.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::735; envelope-from=yewscion@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk1-x735.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I've noticed that, when I explicitly declare absolute permissions in octal during a (chmod =E2=80=A6) in my package definitions and then run guix style, it converts them to decimal instead. Is this intended? I've gotten feedback and agree that octal (#o755) is much clearer to read than decimal (493), simply because I'm used to the actual unix chmod tool and its conventions. =2D- Christopher Rodriguez --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEJMQbvYVxvZ0eF/84XZ6FgaGVz3sFAmLyyMoACgkQXZ6FgaGV z3umXA//b1FpJ7Kn6E58QWOFCr0sp0Dh0glJBiMWlAzuzmY+Z9dwK6tAi+K7ffNn WEm5+qV6lGOdwXJfNjgxlBSgnqSDz6TPCubhMXX4HBLrlWRG2Ql8An0n/kC/bjEV Tyh/JG5gPZHDMrVlaarrWQeFu1/dhmRDSMkLafez3u3LaO0sfH+rSm/10QFugdLa ClFIr0x+X+ZkCRGkrbQyV/y+A7cypnS3EwzGrr7Cf8GoolgII2R29gUADRGkGxDO gAGPOuJg1CXWC/0Jb14N0Koq5FbSnn7K7QUXlh0pPzCmv1UaIEYgrJcfvMgdzc8R SAS3QoDucQHP9yNa5KpMT6z89cpZjXNQ+GaDOxsEz+EpvzcTHpUZ4XkhkuGNO2C0 D1DWoXCl4AliLn4j7N7xkJqsdRpm08s+AbFW5/xf47DX+ItjAfrRn8YPGDKCkJz9 yeNctvFQd4oA81Na4O1sLcZzUSpAvKKnQg399/kXPU7quY/aQP6w8Zjd98XKk5h8 i1+JfacLN1gSd4fOz764uiQ1Hfiw3cHKfwPUMBQqgRxwazyr6lzLiDVbKVE6Nbvg nZLd04m1oZH9iiMoYluEX+cedapPXfCC6cscAnU+nTvS7aWhroCq8tcc0jaTJM2l jfY24oZxW5Nekqbgd3iBBEKahOyy8xbssH8q1sCjaTKP71fWxRw= =LYUE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- ------------=_1662050641-26177-1--