Subject: Re: bug#57079: 29.0.50; Performance of seq-uniq is not very good

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 18:57:33 +0200

Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]> writes:

> What's wrong with using delete-dups for your cases above?

delete-dups is destructive.  You can copy the list first, of course, but
seq-uniq should be much faster than it is.