GNU bug report logs - #56989
[PATCH v1 1/5] gnu: bqn: Add bqn.scm and dbqn package.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: Christopher Rodriguez <yewscion <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 56989 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#56989] [PATCH v3] gnu: Add dbqn.
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 23:09:53 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 08-08-2022 15:54, Christopher Rodriguez wrote:
>> Maxime Devos<maximedevos <at> telenet.be>  writes:
>> Copyright and license headers are missing. Also, usually we don't do
>> per-package modules but rather thematic modules, though that's not a hard
>> rule especially if there are technical problems with that.
> Ah, right, I forgot about those. Not used to creating new files. Will be
> in the patch I'm sending shortly.
>
> As for the per-package rule, this will not be the only package for this
> file. Aside from the 2 user-facing packages and 3 bootstrap packages in
> this series, I'm hoping to package a further (at least) 3 packages—a
> standard library, a DSL, and a primer (info).
>
> I'm also hoping to package an emacs mode, a few fonts, and an update to
> a few packages to add BQN support. But those have their own files, and
> won't be included here.
>
> Is that enough of a justification for a new file, or should I look to
> add this to another? I/suppose/  apl.scm would work, though technically
> that would be like scheme, common lisp, arc, clojure, et al being

I didn't notice the [2/5, 3/5, 4/5, 5/5] patches, the new file should be 
fine I think

Greetings,
Maxime

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

[OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc (application/pgp-keys, attachment)]

[OpenPGP_signature (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.