From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:07:08 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#56969 <56969@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#56969 <56969@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Should erc--download-directory be named eww--download-directory? Reply-To: bug#56969 <56969@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 06:07:08 +0000 retitle 56969 Should erc--download-directory be named eww--download-directo= ry? reassign 56969 emacs submitter 56969 Stefan Kangas severity 56969 wishlist thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 04 04:49:33 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2022 08:49:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51119 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oJWXp-0001pc-KH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 04:49:33 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:48898) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oJWXk-0001pQ-Cu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 04:49:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55542) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJWXk-0000TQ-42 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 04:49:24 -0400 Received: from mail-ua1-f46.google.com ([209.85.222.46]:39652) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJWXe-0007jG-HS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 04:49:23 -0400 Received: by mail-ua1-f46.google.com with SMTP id c19so7989301uat.6 for ; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 01:49:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=F0iWB03VKW9qSgOV5OQX1QXw5+vb9mOHpcrrhOAgjmo=; b=aBCSfBMNUYzlUPnA2TNXdHsTK1R59q7hPbk4MrOlRriPMwYOboRzeMSumpfpu+5Blb lSfBGUbSLMrkzmX+rGKPG8qx5rttsw5GUezIexvTtLJb3GMLBqatZKOQvNsVplTiS2th 16IdW1jpbbs7U9h6fSU5+SusgCVAuTjmJvrL/w09D0IUDL3gL9kYfk4IS3cu0Aizs/3k G4d5Ns7Z14PXw6tR9gPIZWBqDJRHD56Da6BuxS+0h00eRpt/fJNQNXL7sw+JlYoV+igc baZCDfLZLEWoQw6b97k+GK00N0r5geSTjYHkMTW0DhIYEpA1+X4mMl9FD+aDjmXfGajn kzsw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3ZWCpyI/d9dMaNdX4fF2jDXpjgvTCTHeT/FmO4TQXf1QD5yHKi /dno7RfrJOgbGrg9u3oHqQKXH12VE960wqVTzhaYhDxb X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4fMKu2YhtQebO+SiK5vKhY7PQFTdyDS8Z9pIW7xeTxHIfyHCNzktXFPUB3X4Z8w+F5JSOojf4drqaXxc71Qzc= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6197:0:b0:387:8e6e:91b8 with SMTP id h23-20020ab06197000000b003878e6e91b8mr281282uan.26.1659602957252; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 01:49:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 08:49:16 +0000 From: Stefan Kangas X-Debbugs-CC: Lars Ingebrigtsen MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 08:49:16 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Should erc--download-directory be named eww--download-directory? To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.222.46; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-ua1-f46.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) Severity: wishlist Lars, is there a particular reason why erc--download-directory in eww.el is named that way? It seems to me that it should be eww--download-directory instead. Is it just a typo? It was added in: commit 76f71e39f583b7f8bb47a47b315f49af6f23886e Author: Lars Ingebrigtsen Date: Wed Jul 29 07:13:56 2020 +0200 Make eww use the XDG download directory * lisp/net/eww.el (erc--download-directory): New function (bug#41030). (eww-download-directory): Use it. (eww-download): Use it. (eww-download-callback): Adjust parameters. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 04 05:05:21 2022 Received: (at 56969) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2022 09:05:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51149 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oJWnB-0002GN-Jg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 05:05:21 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50142) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oJWn9-0002G5-Uu for 56969@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 05:05:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=FRS04iwvleQhajJX8WPU8I408vVxpNZ4KsfZU9dlJB0=; b=cND06Qeo654oQHUFWRvQQhaJ3u FV9MzDd5sMA7pdaJ+J9jWi4KnX18UTbtygBR8O62hKKY5ciPu+/YhxJtc91tFDoPBLfvr4wXD01YR a0f/HBNJlEirEZ87gbEkLGRMsfBU0xmOq9pF1V1aBcEu9UjQp0tMFEC37EbLaeRq9tf0=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oJWn2-00057G-6s; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 11:05:14 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Kangas Subject: Re: bug#56969: Should erc--download-directory be named eww--download-directory? In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Thu, 4 Aug 2022 08:49:16 +0000") References: Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAGFBMVEX7+/stKCjV1dSH g3NcWE8MBwmxsKX///8fuVgaAAAAAWJLR0QHFmGI6wAAAAd0SU1FB+YIBAg6JkpshJUAAAF+SURB VDjL7ZOxcoMwDIZ9vIEO3JkY6p1g2Ckxuy9W50CI3/8RKtm0Sblk6tqfQYc+6ZcwIMS/9oKkwxar ZoDTCaAUmPS+xQoGLCTiRaDvjGTgqJ7AAEiBgJ/aOXbk5IFYo0SH6AisICMYJXvMm+VFgEd5lgSo 3EcACRSDN4Y7ij1YxzfrCNA9mScrR+va6Rps4XgrCd8AB5oxVmMn8RYLCbgIJFuFvGncjbOpw/cd g08dcmPdyrsmcFQHHu5OH6Pp8BAfK4LT2jAwZrAe+EgcxA5v2hbhIiSJ3OkQ+zBHUE06AsB0JLiw 9+xc29eOAN4Bd9QIue7icBsBFRdjg44AjjaCJh4OAQSQvqbV8lXyi0LqYUBLFfJcF9Yfl6vlGfkP APR6MVPQS0XvfDByAxyV6pVSOhDw9vFjoFwISl9LEfrA0iGppHpVZkoIpUSWlayMoyJSqgSe6jfI XgH1d5Dt0+X2K2RPs/v8I9nUvvq5noKHde7iGXpRdC1kv434ApdpsKWK9rESAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRl OmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIyLTA4LTA0VDA4OjU4OjM4KzAwOjAwer+ILwAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkA MjAyMi0wOC0wNFQwODo1ODozOCswMDowMAviMJMAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Genesis's _The Lamb Lies Down On Broadway (2)_: "The Lamia" Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 11:05:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87les4idko.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Kangas writes: > Lars, is there a particular reason why erc--download-directory in eww.el > is named that way? It seems to me that it should be > eww--download-directory instead. Is it just a typo? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56969 Cc: 56969@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Stefan Kangas writes: > Lars, is there a particular reason why erc--download-directory in eww.el > is named that way? It seems to me that it should be > eww--download-directory instead. Is it just a typo? Yeah, just a typo. Now fixed in Emacs 29. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 04 05:05:31 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2022 09:05:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51152 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oJWnK-0002Gl-T2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 05:05:31 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50174) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oJWnI-0002GW-Qh for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 05:05:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=MwqO+fNeXz6TieCmu7RJCtdWZwcMAXSnDLSv0PfA8Kw=; b=SvdRaT+5utBwacFoESu09GSv9T JPU99acyeRmOm3OaJAiK7tZKA9yUmUtOY0RUL/yONRrd9KDGUIPns022+mER/1NVIivav3ypby7Gm FwsNKRqj0EhhBP69UjwjBImH1vcMHhjMtkUJnAOgzx5ygIk+gF0ndjRgoE46TdWwhsvI=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oJWnB-00057R-2c for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 11:05:23 +0200 Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 11:05:20 +0200 Message-Id: <87k07oidkf.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #56969 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 56969 29.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 56969 29.1 quit From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:07:08 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 11:24:13 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator