From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:33:35 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#56845 <56845@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#56845 <56845@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: unclear error message: No route to host Reply-To: bug#56845 <56845@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 17:33:35 +0000 retitle 56845 unclear error message: No route to host reassign 56845 guix submitter 56845 Csepp severity 56845 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 30 14:37:50 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jul 2022 18:37:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35755 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oHrLS-0000Eg-5P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 14:37:50 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39848) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oHrLP-0000EV-71 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 14:37:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oHrLO-0007wY-P9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 14:37:46 -0400 Received: from mx0.riseup.net ([198.252.153.6]:50362) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oHrLM-0004mp-RN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 14:37:46 -0400 Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx0.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LwCmh2d52z9s4M for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 18:37:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1659206260; bh=3Al/TObV6Ddnrm/E0xaDMC/qydrRnTFLmV7fL7KCAyE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=jqGnyELW0DQMnN8WnFxnx/T4I8Lsk2oLH1POkMmbrmALsvnXA4KmnU8x3Tb4mzDpG b2rQdD47K6iROnklxZENnjYTb1PykGoj4EwLc4IuvcEyQnUbEMSi/XHFn2sJ4OnRyv bCkHRSZ9hkBmFY3Bf2kHDgZYEMGzd6F/tcbPr/CU= X-Riseup-User-ID: 04F20542ED0D38D81B97E8FE27B54CF0EA4C95E548E5DF89B058273829BF7697 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LwCmg51vVz5vXJ for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 18:37:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Csepp To: Bug reports GNU Guix Subject: unclear error message: No route to host Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 20:33:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87edy2wiow.fsf@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.6; envelope-from=raingloom@riseup.net; helo=mx0.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) ``` guix pull -v3 --cores=1 guix pull: error: failed to load '/home/raingloom/.config/guix/channels.scm': No route to host ``` My channels.scm mentions at least 3 hosts by name and indirectly uses ci.guix.gnu.org via channel-with-substitutes-available. It's quite possible this is more a Guile issue, but then again, Guix should give a clear stack trace about which function the error originates from. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 05 11:04:45 2022 Received: (at 56845) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Aug 2022 15:04:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60238 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oJysW-0005CA-U6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 11:04:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41504) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oJysS-0005Bv-8j for 56845@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 11:04:42 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38350) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJysM-0004qN-49; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 11:04:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=sFpRfaO+MZOwcoanjEa56Il2lq+GzgvuGOOw+p9U06s=; b=Jsm3+pHmy+R28BxNdGTx b/szwq6FfMfUE8Agup9YhuVw3jEBFc7edMNSP7aLpeEqOso71+EobvYQgzvKhjhuk0wfPcAL9bTXL tXKuUzxsDpFvMPXIJ0Mv845PCXYfwY4gRVDSRowJdjUDazxgnCyrmRSaDmc60ZVAfDE1aOIpsZ7oJ 1fzLT+mVqLSKAI0JaRVJpdPWvE3XlWJwA5A+FgCTMN9rGQCTbTPGTfbYHpAIcuNN4BL0TkRgsW7Fg /4HpM75TP378OOx30Ioev9n030RTnHgAKmwNhf+JZxHgxRp9XoM206T61pPBJzdAbuZUFn0EWm5e/ wcv4Blo2yxzPIQ==; Received: from [193.50.111.124] (port=57278 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJysL-0002HH-Iy; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 11:04:33 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Csepp Subject: Re: bug#56845: unclear error message: No route to host References: <87edy2wiow.fsf@riseup.net> Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2022 17:04:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87edy2wiow.fsf@riseup.net> (Csepp's message of "Sat, 30 Jul 2022 20:33:23 +0200") Message-ID: <87edxug29s.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56845 Cc: 56845@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Csepp skribis: > guix pull -v3 --cores=3D1=20=20=20=20=20=20 > guix pull: error: failed to load '/home/raingloom/.config/guix/channels.s= cm': No route to host > ``` > > My channels.scm mentions at least 3 hosts by name and indirectly uses > ci.guix.gnu.org via channel-with-substitutes-available. =E2=80=98channel-with-substitutes-available=E2=80=99 failed due to a networ= king issue, which is where =E2=80=9CNo route to host=E2=80=9D comes from (it means that ci.guix.gnu.org could not be reached from your machine). > It's quite possible this is more a Guile issue, but then again, Guix > should give a clear stack trace about which function the error > originates from. Yeah, =E2=80=98load*=E2=80=99 should better discriminate on the type of iss= ues: issues such as =E2=80=9CFile not found=E2=80=9D (where displaying a stack trace wo= uld be wrong), and issues caused by actually running the code. Right now it loads the file at once (meaning open + read + eval), so it doesn=E2=80=99t = have a sufficiently detailed vision. Ludo=E2=80=99.