GNU bug report logs - #56831
[PATCH] gnu: mumps: Update to 5.5.1

Previous Next

Full log

Message #8 received at 56831 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes <at> inria.fr>
To: FELŠÖCI Marek <marek <at> felsoci.sk>
Cc: 56831 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#56831: [PATCH] gnu: mumps: Update to 5.5.1
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 12:17:16 +0200

Hi Marek,

FELŠÖCI Marek <marek <at> felsoci.sk> skribis:

> -       (patches (search-patches "mumps-build-parallelism.patch"
> -                                "mumps-shared-libseq.patch"
> -                                "mumps-shared-mumps.patch"
> -                                "mumps-shared-pord.patch"))))

Good to see them go.  :-)

Could you please also remove the files and remove them from
‘gnu/local.mk’?

> -     `(#:modules ((ice-9 match)
> -                  (ice-9 popen)
> -                  (srfi srfi-1)
> -                  ,@%gnu-build-system-modules)
> +     `(#:modules
> +       ((ice-9 match)
> +        (ice-9 popen)
> +        (srfi srfi-1)
> +        ,@%gnu-build-system-modules)

This is unnecessary; if you could avoid it, that’d be great: it’d make
the important changes more visible.

>         #:phases
>         (modify-phases %standard-phases
>           (replace 'configure
> -          (lambda* (#:key inputs #:allow-other-keys)
> -            (call-with-output-file "Makefile.inc"
> -              (lambda (port)

Looks like this hunk is mostly reformatting as well?

> +                         (assoc-ref inputs "openblas")
> +                         (->bool ;; OpenBLAS or MKL?
> +                          (file-exists?
> +                           (string-append
> +                            (assoc-ref inputs "openblas")
> +                            "/include/mkl_cblas.h")))

I understand the intent and that’s fine, but I would prefer a solution
that does not explicitly refer to MKL.  Perhaps we could devise a
solution that, more generally, allows users to swap one BLAS for
another, but maybe that’s beyond the scope of this patch.

Could you send a v2 of the patch that addresses these comments?

Bonus points if you can provide a commit log that follows the ChangeLog
style:

  https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Submitting-Patches.html

:-)

Thank you,
Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.