GNU bug report logs - #56769
[PATCH] gnu: wrap-python3: Clarify relationship with wrapped package.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Philip McGrath <philip <at> philipmcgrath.com>

Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 20:06:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#56769: closed ([PATCH] gnu: wrap-python3: Clarify
 relationship with wrapped package.)
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:59:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:58:30 +0200
with message-id <871qtp79bd.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#56769: [PATCH] gnu: wrap-python3: Clarify relationship with wrapped package.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #56769,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: wrap-python3: Clarify relationship with wrapped package.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
56769: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=56769
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Philip McGrath <philip <at> philipmcgrath.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: wrap-python3: Clarify relationship with wrapped package.
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 16:05:10 -0400
The previous description could give the impression that the user faced a
choice between `python` and `python3`, but could not have both at once.
In fact, the packages `python-wrapper` and `python-minimal-wrapper`
already provide both sets of names.

* gnu/packages/python.scm (wrap-python3)[description]: Tweak.
---
 gnu/packages/python.scm | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 4fcee28ba3..c815343d5d 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/python.scm
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
 ;;; Copyright © 2019 Tanguy Le Carrour <tanguy <at> bioneland.org>
 ;;; Copyright © 2020 Jan (janneke) Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
 ;;; Copyright © 2020, 2021 Greg Hogan <code <at> greghogan.com>
+;;; Copyright © 2022 Philip McGrath <philip <at> philipmcgrath.com>
 ;;;
 ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
 ;;;
@@ -662,10 +663,12 @@ (define* (wrap-python3 python
     (synopsis "Wrapper for the Python 3 commands")
     (description
      "This package provides wrappers for the commands of Python <at> tie{}3.x such
-that they can be invoked under their usual name---e.g., @command{python}
+that they can also be invoked under their usual names---e.g., @command{python}
 instead of @command{python3} or @command{pip} instead of @command{pip3}.
 To function properly, this package should not be installed together with the
-@command{python} package.")))
+@command{python} package: this package uses the @command{python} package as a
+propagated input, so installing this package already makes both the versioned
+and the unversioned commands available.")))
 
 (define-public python-wrapper (wrap-python3 python))
 (define-public python-minimal-wrapper (wrap-python3 python-minimal))

base-commit: 212ca81895b2baa819ea11a308ad21880b84a546
-- 
2.32.0



[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Philip McGrath <philip <at> philipmcgrath.com>
Cc: 56769-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#56769: [PATCH] gnu: wrap-python3: Clarify relationship with
 wrapped package.
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:58:30 +0200
Hi,

Philip McGrath <philip <at> philipmcgrath.com> skribis:

> The previous description could give the impression that the user faced a
> choice between `python` and `python3`, but could not have both at once.
> In fact, the packages `python-wrapper` and `python-minimal-wrapper`
> already provide both sets of names.
>
> * gnu/packages/python.scm (wrap-python3)[description]: Tweak.

Applied!

> +@command{python} package: this package uses the @command{python} package as a
> +propagated input, so installing this package already makes both the versioned
> +and the unversioned commands available.")))

Change @command to @code above.

Thanks,
Ludo’.


This bug report was last modified 3 years and 6 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.