GNU bug report logs -
#56682
Fix the long lines font locking related slowdowns
Previous Next
Full log
Message #796 received at 56682 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>
> Also, I'm trying to imagine scenario that leads to such an abuse:
>
> - under normal circumstances, there are no long lines, so they'll never
> hit a "locked" narrowing and it will thus never occur to them to use a
> `widen-unlock`.
>
> - when they get a bug report with a locked narrowing because of long
> lines, using `widen-unlock` naively is likely to lead to an immediate
> performance problem, so it's unlikely they'll use it.
>
When I read this, I thought you had a point, but there's a fallacy in your
reasoning: using widen-unlock is in fact not likely to lead to an
immediate performance problem. The long-line-threshold limit is
sufficiently high to never be reached in "normal" files, but nothing would
happen if you cross that limit by a small amount, and nothing would even
happen at twice or even thrice that limit.
If a mode author gets a bug report that is caused by locked narrowing,
there is something wrong in the way the mode fontifies the buffer. There
is no reason to require access the whole buffer to fontify a small chunk
of that buffer. IOW, using widen-unlock there is nearly always wrong (I
add "nearly" to leave open the possibility that there might be an
exception).
This is becoming so litigious (you're now telling me that you're offended)
that I start to believe that the right thing might in fact be to
completely disable font locking in such buffers. Would "no highlighting"
be better than "occasional mis-highlighting" from your point of view?
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 8 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.