Subject: Re: bug#56641: Deprecate `lsh`

From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 06:38:08 +0300

Mattias Engdegård [2022-07-23 18:51 +0200] wrote:

> 23 juli 2022 kl. 17.42 skrev Basil L. Contovounesios <[email-masked]>:
>
>> Thanks, but the warnings are being stubborn with and not listening to
>> me.  Could you please have a word with them?
>
> A serious conversation was held and some very frank words were pronounced.

Is there an RFC for that protocol?  It seems to be effective.

>> First, they are a bit repetitive in parallel 'make -j8 check':
>
> That was made on purpose to really hammer the point home.

Is it a bug that we don't consistently do that for all warnings?

>>  For the `mapcar' case, only the `mapcar' function can be used in
>>  the symbol list.  For `suspicious', only `set-buffer' can be used.
>>                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Clearly you aren't suspicious enough.

But enough to not be suspiciously unsuspicious.

>> How can these issues be addressed?
>
> Why, `git pull` of course!

I picked some of that up from my local pharmacy, and...

> (Sorry about all this, and thanks a lot!)

...WFM, thanks!  No need to apologise,

-- 
Basil