Subject: bug#56641: Deprecate `lsh`

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 18:40:38 +0300

> From: Stefan Kangas <[email-masked]>
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:44:18 -0400
> Cc: [email-masked]
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]> writes:
> 
> > The ELisp manual already says that ash is a better alternative, but
> > lsh has its niche,
> 
> When would I want to use `lsh' over `ash'?

When you want the results that lsh gives you.

They don't yield the same results in all situations.