From unknown Fri Aug 15 20:48:39 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#56539: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98guix?= shell -D =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=A6_?= =?UTF-8?Q?--export-manifest=E2=80=99?= behaves inconsistently Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 14:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 56539 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 56539@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16577217243618 (code B ref -1); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 14:16:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2022 14:15:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47415 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oBd99-0000wI-Qi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:15:24 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:47264) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oBd97-0000wA-VJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:15:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36250) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oBd94-0002wJ-Le for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:15:21 -0400 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:32191) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oBd91-0004zD-Lm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:15:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=HEe28YX8whPVjPYG6ElPO8scjsmpDpkiDI37iyC3NAw=; b=ktFbAoLT/2D/ogJo+d+3tHBmO19v4DeDf58baiUKfffvNLqfj4y43vF3 UrK0FJA+28ZsyBAxBXB+byv6Z9UcRmW9Ru9oZ39kB8kyNJQIq2u8q4nfh KB6AwcY23zTYvCmzwsK1SdLaauyg5i3nH6KqTtzicN6PHwShh99g2UPzm k=; Authentication-Results: mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=ludovic.courtes@inria.fr; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) d=inria.fr X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.92,267,1650924000"; d="scan'208";a="45500349" Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net (HELO ribbon) ([91.160.117.201]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jul 2022 16:15:12 +0200 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Quintidi 25 Messidor an 230 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution,?= jour de la Pintade X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:15:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87lesx9k0g.fsf@inria.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=192.134.164.83; envelope-from=ludovic.courtes@inria.fr; helo=mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hi! I observe the following weird behavior, where the first invocation wrongfully expands =E2=80=98-D gnutls=E2=80=99 into a list of package specs= , whereas the other invocations (only slightly different) lead to calls to =E2=80=98package->development-manifest=E2=80=99 as expected: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix shell -D gnutls autoconf@2.69 automake libtool --export-manifest ;; What follows is a "manifest" equivalent to the command line you gave. ;; You can store it in a file that you may then pass to any 'guix' command ;; that accepts a '--manifest' (or '-m') option. (specifications->manifest (list "libtool" "automake" "autoconf@2.69" "net-tools" "iproute2" "socat" "pkg-config" "texinfo" "which" "datefudge" "util-linux" "guile@3.0.7" "libtasn1" "libidn2" "nettle" "zlib" "p11-kit@0.23" "tar" "gzip" "bzip2" "xz" "file@5.39" "diffutils" "patch" "findutils" "gawk" "sed" "grep" "coreutils" "make" "bash-minimal" "ld-wrapper" "binutils" "gcc@10" "glibc" "glibc:static" "glibc-utf8-locales" "libgc" "libunistring" "gmp" "linux-libre-headers@5.10.35")) $ guix shell -D gnutls autoconf@2.69 automake --export-manifest ;; What follows is a "manifest" equivalent to the command line you gave. ;; You can store it in a file that you may then pass to any 'guix' command ;; that accepts a '--manifest' (or '-m') option. (concatenate-manifests (list (specifications->manifest (list "autoconf@2.69" "automake")) (package->development-manifest (specification->package "gnutls")))) $ guix shell -D gnutls autoconf automake libtool --export-manifest ;; What follows is a "manifest" equivalent to the command line you gave. ;; You can store it in a file that you may then pass to any 'guix' command ;; that accepts a '--manifest' (or '-m') option. (concatenate-manifests (list (specifications->manifest (list "autoconf" "automake" "libtool")) (package->development-manifest (specification->package "gnutls")))) $ guix describe Generation 221 Jul 03 2022 23:52:07 (current) guix e069de4 repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: e069de452a2c923868f5137421b4b6349c38d754 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Fri Aug 15 20:48:39 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#56539: closed (Re: bug#56539: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98guix?= shell -D =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=A6_?= =?UTF-8?Q?--export-manifest=E2=80=99?= behaves inconsistently) Message-ID: References: <87sfn25qri.fsf@gnu.org> <87lesx9k0g.fsf@inria.fr> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 56539 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 56539@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 15:40:03 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1657899603-19445-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1657899603-19445-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #56539: =E2=80=98guix shell -D =E2=80=A6 --export-manifest=E2=80=99 behaves= inconsistently which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 56539@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 56539: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D56539 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1657899603-19445-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 56539-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jul 2022 15:40:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42029 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oCNQ8-00053M-HT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:40:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38960) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oCNQ0-00052z-VD for 56539-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:39:59 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35064) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oCNPv-0002n7-Oa for 56539-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:39:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=HYgp8XUWI/V3XOjn5jeFXCobsHoPtj4ynfgyYiugTwQ=; b=n+UPuhNcx9y2FZsadcVb 2HdZvzY4m6067E0M88SVhtIZ+JSrcZvisJgUyz3WIpmEtguIcIZf26efjxjx3Fuw2tHnMqiwlKXwP kNKNXZQY7e3IyTqlEhdAEO7Q5ECHhO5SL+q5YuBNnQjdFbZDjuqzYuJSBU0/dqL4K5mxu2zK6jviY +75Y+Up3gQyb/IxrXVKqKGR5phFodaPj4yNbrTnqhwAG9HAoMJbAsE2TBS/vMRLVTNXDerkp3kDsQ PBUjq+x2V2usYX/J7nRfYtqFkKkdewyMe/UmrNS2nTEvBtk09/qJqxlClqKtyspXy1idGnGzRYtpV F91O17VItSTwgg==; Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201]:59534 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oCNPv-0002r9-CI for 56539-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:39:47 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: 56539-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#56539: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98guix?= shell -D =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=A6_--export-manifest=E2=80=99?= behaves inconsistently References: <87lesx9k0g.fsf@inria.fr> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:39:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lesx9k0g.fsf@inria.fr> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22?= =?utf-8?Q?'s?= message of "Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:15:11 +0200") Message-ID: <87sfn25qri.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56539-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Ludovic Court=C3=A8s skribis: > I observe the following weird behavior, where the first invocation > wrongfully expands =E2=80=98-D gnutls=E2=80=99 into a list of package spe= cs, whereas the > other invocations (only slightly different) lead to calls to > =E2=80=98package->development-manifest=E2=80=99 as expected: This had to due with profile caching: cached profiles would be taken into account, leading to the =E2=80=9Cexpanded view=E2=80=9D because the = =E2=80=98-D=E2=80=99 information would be lost in that case. Fixed in 30915a7419d48c6a5dcfdc3a1547268ac406a9ef. Ludo=E2=80=99. ------------=_1657899603-19445-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2022 14:15:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47415 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oBd99-0000wI-Qi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:15:24 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:47264) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oBd97-0000wA-VJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:15:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36250) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oBd94-0002wJ-Le for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:15:21 -0400 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:32191) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oBd91-0004zD-Lm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:15:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=HEe28YX8whPVjPYG6ElPO8scjsmpDpkiDI37iyC3NAw=; b=ktFbAoLT/2D/ogJo+d+3tHBmO19v4DeDf58baiUKfffvNLqfj4y43vF3 UrK0FJA+28ZsyBAxBXB+byv6Z9UcRmW9Ru9oZ39kB8kyNJQIq2u8q4nfh KB6AwcY23zTYvCmzwsK1SdLaauyg5i3nH6KqTtzicN6PHwShh99g2UPzm k=; Authentication-Results: mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=ludovic.courtes@inria.fr; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) d=inria.fr X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.92,267,1650924000"; d="scan'208";a="45500349" Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net (HELO ribbon) ([91.160.117.201]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jul 2022 16:15:12 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98guix?= shell -D =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=A6_--export-m?= =?utf-8?Q?anifest=E2=80=99?= behaves inconsistently X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Quintidi 25 Messidor an 230 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9v?= =?utf-8?Q?olution=2C?= jour de la Pintade X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:15:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87lesx9k0g.fsf@inria.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=192.134.164.83; envelope-from=ludovic.courtes@inria.fr; helo=mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hi! I observe the following weird behavior, where the first invocation wrongfully expands =E2=80=98-D gnutls=E2=80=99 into a list of package specs= , whereas the other invocations (only slightly different) lead to calls to =E2=80=98package->development-manifest=E2=80=99 as expected: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix shell -D gnutls autoconf@2.69 automake libtool --export-manifest ;; What follows is a "manifest" equivalent to the command line you gave. ;; You can store it in a file that you may then pass to any 'guix' command ;; that accepts a '--manifest' (or '-m') option. (specifications->manifest (list "libtool" "automake" "autoconf@2.69" "net-tools" "iproute2" "socat" "pkg-config" "texinfo" "which" "datefudge" "util-linux" "guile@3.0.7" "libtasn1" "libidn2" "nettle" "zlib" "p11-kit@0.23" "tar" "gzip" "bzip2" "xz" "file@5.39" "diffutils" "patch" "findutils" "gawk" "sed" "grep" "coreutils" "make" "bash-minimal" "ld-wrapper" "binutils" "gcc@10" "glibc" "glibc:static" "glibc-utf8-locales" "libgc" "libunistring" "gmp" "linux-libre-headers@5.10.35")) $ guix shell -D gnutls autoconf@2.69 automake --export-manifest ;; What follows is a "manifest" equivalent to the command line you gave. ;; You can store it in a file that you may then pass to any 'guix' command ;; that accepts a '--manifest' (or '-m') option. (concatenate-manifests (list (specifications->manifest (list "autoconf@2.69" "automake")) (package->development-manifest (specification->package "gnutls")))) $ guix shell -D gnutls autoconf automake libtool --export-manifest ;; What follows is a "manifest" equivalent to the command line you gave. ;; You can store it in a file that you may then pass to any 'guix' command ;; that accepts a '--manifest' (or '-m') option. (concatenate-manifests (list (specifications->manifest (list "autoconf" "automake" "libtool")) (package->development-manifest (specification->package "gnutls")))) $ guix describe Generation 221 Jul 03 2022 23:52:07 (current) guix e069de4 repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: e069de452a2c923868f5137421b4b6349c38d754 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Ludo=E2=80=99. ------------=_1657899603-19445-1--