GNU bug report logs - #56535
28.1; `no' and `no-ding' values for isearch-wrap-pause option (since Emacs 28.1) not working as documented

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Arun V <arunlalv04 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 11:54:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo

Found in version 28.1

Fixed in version 29.0.50

Done: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Arun V <arunlalv04 <at> gmail.com>
To: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Cc: 56535 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, visuweshm <at> gmail.com
Subject: bug#56535: 28.1; `no' and `no-ding' values for isearch-wrap-pause option (since Emacs 28.1) not working as documented
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 01:29:16 +0530
>I suppose non-incremental search here means repeatable search,
>i.e. the search that is being repeated with C-s C-s.
>Maybe then better to emphasize this difference explicitly?
>For example: 'inc-no' and 'inc-no-ding' for incremental wrapping,
>and leave the existing 'no' and 'no-ding' for repeatable wrapping.

I too thought of it as this would preserve the original meaning of the
current values in letter and spirit.

But won't it give the notion that 'inc-no-ding' and 'no-ding' are
mutually exclusive?
Meaning, setting value as 'inc-no-ding' won't wrap for repeatable
searches, and setting 'no-ding' won't wrap for incremental searches.

Shouldn't we be conveying that one of the options includes/performs
the behaviour of all the other ones, in addition to handling the new
scenario?




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 345 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.