From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 10 17:42:18 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jul 2022 21:42:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37873 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oAeh0-0006ke-G6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 17:42:18 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:54114) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oAegy-0006kW-U1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 17:42:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36948) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oAegy-0007xR-H0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 17:42:16 -0400 Received: from w1.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.162]:46360) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oAegw-0007Mg-QB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 17:42:16 -0400 Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3435BFBF6F2 for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:42:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1657489333; s=s1; d=tutanota.com; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:Sender; bh=PbMgixnpnUzy177MBm4OrxedsUsLPAQ7znd19S6ChtM=; b=PZCkjteYb453Af/3u6WBOw08yBj6lfwfTJCUdHiuMjBeyT4sK4gj+BvZeREHJORa PqG0RVS5nhw2F9FuZ4VPklZpoyZLKrbTFMMlrh3klL4GxcuaOkbvLgUOYsghRwtKH0K /E1Y0oNj2wdUSN2N2MpvIIrm3ljJ1lZjZN7pw9HCmK5YJV3UFjYRU3my1qE3rcyanKr tzwgyJH6boBN1NNrOf93NqGnPNufCb8gfkt50C4T/ifLGQVOJYleQxm6B7LRmdloreC JQ6gYo2TK5Nz3jJfQhTKQu5AQWRJhJZnJQTTb0BaIw4FzTjPauKiTojzlJfb+np7vNw +EcEDENcEw== Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 23:42:13 +0200 (CEST) From: carlmarcos@tutanota.com To: Bug Gnu Emacs Message-ID: Subject: Incomplete description of Completion Commands in Emacs Manual an Lisp Reference MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1510997_1017831220.1657489333204" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.162; envelope-from=carlmarcos@tutanota.com; helo=w1.tutanota.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) ------=_Part_1510997_1017831220.1657489333204 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am using completing-read, but am finding it laborious to find information= regarding Completion Commands. In the Emacs Manual there is "8.4.2 Completion Commands" and in the Emacs L= isp Reference Manual there is "21.6.3 Minibuffer Commands that Do Completio= n".=C2=A0 Although the aforementioned sections do describe the result of us= ing "TAB" and "?" to display the list of completion, I do not think the inf= ormation is incomplete because one can also move from one completion entry = to another using the up and down arrows. ------=_Part_1510997_1017831220.1657489333204 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I am using completing-read, but am finding it laborious to find information regarding Completion Commands.

In the Emacs Manual there is "8.4.2 Completion Commands" and in the Emacs Lisp Reference Manual there is "21.6.3 Minibuffer Commands that Do Completion".  Although the aforementioned sections do describe the result of using "TAB" and "?" to display the list of completion, I do not think the information is incomplete because one can also move from one completion entry to another using the up and down arrows.

------=_Part_1510997_1017831220.1657489333204-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 11 06:02:34 2022 Received: (at 56489) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2022 10:02:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38304 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oAqFO-0003Ib-54 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 06:02:34 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:48884) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oAqFM-0003Fa-QH for 56489@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 06:02:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ZfkFXlqahqxzQIbDLWyC3tpWKWhPsrS3OrqiCtC54jc=; b=YLwoWCr63e2Akqn9FNOPWLVYwG 483ofRgoMME2913RPzcaQ2OhURMOvLK8HTTa/GdpbylnycebKT8+nvDlq+bPeI/v67sT4fu2HRxtg 5fmp/nN5Fs0pJ4yApAibss1JbEfXbbMhSJ8xiddLYuKAehPaWJrS1ZxRJp1sMpYiYC4c=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oAqFE-0001Wf-DP; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 12:02:27 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: carlmarcos@tutanota.com Subject: Re: bug#56489: Incomplete description of Completion Commands in Emacs Manual an Lisp Reference In-Reply-To: (carlmarcos@tutanota.com's message of "Sun, 10 Jul 2022 23:42:13 +0200 (CEST)") References: X-Now-Playing: AR Kane's _Single Collection (1)_: "One Way Mirror " Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 12:02:22 +0200 Message-ID: <87sfn80xxt.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: carlmarcos@tutanota.com writes: > In the Emacs Manual there is "8.4.2 Completion Commands" and in the > Emacs Lisp Reference Manual there is "21.6.3 Minibuffer Commands that > Do Completion". Although the aforementioned sections do [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56489 Cc: 56489@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) carlmarcos@tutanota.com writes: > In the Emacs Manual there is "8.4.2 Completion Commands" and in the > Emacs Lisp Reference Manual there is "21.6.3 Minibuffer Commands that > Do Completion". Although the aforementioned sections do describe the > result of using "TAB" and "?" to display the list of completion, I do > not think the information is incomplete because one can also move from > one completion entry to another using the up and down arrows. The arrow keys don't do anything completion-related -- they move through the command history. Closing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 11 06:02:38 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2022 10:02:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38307 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oAqFS-0003It-C5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 06:02:38 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:48898) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oAqFQ-0003IQ-Nr for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 06:02:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xP156hnr6xYuN0oXUQ1x03X8zGTDhNuXPW7BsX7SSF4=; b=H0UQnqI7r83ZvgK/WP8J8SbQ8Z FHrrPPAv8OIWvrUT/A43X4IMbx0osXH5ui2MRVecY7ap62Qdpx79UGNM313T4pRd1KSwMX7UHmDcG JqW1MEeiUDPf8fO71nBlHvT6E/tsxOScpJ9dHlqs8WOMRYLChhpl42/M3zQ4Jib+4p+Q=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oAqFI-0001Wl-QF for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 12:02:30 +0200 Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 12:02:28 +0200 Message-Id: <87r12s0xxn.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #56489 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 56489 notabug close 56489 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 56489 notabug close 56489 quit From unknown Fri Aug 15 16:22:47 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 11:24:10 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator