GNU bug report logs - #56442
gnus-search-run-search: Hits notmuch command line length limits

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>
To: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
Cc: notmuch <at> notmuchmail.org, 56442 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#56442: gnus-search-run-search: Hits notmuch command line length limits
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2022 09:11:22 -0700

Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name> writes:

> Hello,
>
> I'm running a pretty innocent notmuch query over a fairly small Maildir:
>
> "((List:debian-devel.lists.debian.org) or ... or
> (List:debian-haskell.lists.debian.org) or
> (List:debconf-discuss.lists.debian.org)) and (not path:annex/**)"
>
> but gnus-search-run-search fails to return any results.  The reason is
> that Gnus first runs the query with --output=threads to obtain a list of
> thread ids, and then runs another query with --output=files and a query
> constructed from the output of the first query: "thread:000000000000d9d0
> or thread:000000000000d9e0 or thread:000000000000d268 or ..."
>
> The resulting command fails completely:
>
>     emacs: /usr/bin/notmuch: Argument list too long
>
> Instead of running two searches like this, we can just surround the
> whole query like this: "thread:{QUERY}".  The manual says it's exactly
> equivalent:
>
>     ... the user should think of the query thread:{<something>} as
>     expanding to all of the thread IDs which match <something>; not‐
>     much then performs a second search using the expanded query.
>
> This should be faster, too, with only running a single external command.
> Here is the patch I'm thinking I'll apply, if anyone has comments.

Huh, I tried this a couple months ago with a more complicated query,
like:

thread:{from:bob or from:jane}

and I remember notmuch barking at me about spaces or the "or" or
something -- anyway I got the impression that it couldn't accept
multi-part queries inside the "thread:{}" syntax. But looking at your
patch maybe I just needed to quote differently?

Anyway I'll give this a test this weekend. It would be *very* nice if we
could use this syntax rather than the ugly home-grown one.

Thanks for the report!

Eric

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.