GNU bug report logs -
#56442
gnus-search-run-search: Hits notmuch command line length limits
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 14 Jul 2022 11:50:13 -0700
with message-id <87cze7ttp6.fsf <at> athena.silentflame.com>
and subject line Re: bug#56442: gnus-search-run-search: Hits notmuch command line length limits
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #56442,
regarding gnus-search-run-search: Hits notmuch command line length limits
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
56442: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=56442
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,
I'm running a pretty innocent notmuch query over a fairly small Maildir:
"((List:debian-devel.lists.debian.org) or ... or
(List:debian-haskell.lists.debian.org) or
(List:debconf-discuss.lists.debian.org)) and (not path:annex/**)"
but gnus-search-run-search fails to return any results. The reason is
that Gnus first runs the query with --output=threads to obtain a list of
thread ids, and then runs another query with --output=files and a query
constructed from the output of the first query: "thread:000000000000d9d0
or thread:000000000000d9e0 or thread:000000000000d268 or ..."
The resulting command fails completely:
emacs: /usr/bin/notmuch: Argument list too long
Instead of running two searches like this, we can just surround the
whole query like this: "thread:{QUERY}". The manual says it's exactly
equivalent:
... the user should think of the query thread:{<something>} as
expanding to all of the thread IDs which match <something>; not‐
much then performs a second search using the expanded query.
This should be faster, too, with only running a single external command.
Here is the patch I'm thinking I'll apply, if anyone has comments.
--
Sean Whitton
[0001-Use-notmuch-thread-operator-instead-of-performing-tw.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hello,
On Sat 09 Jul 2022 at 11:01AM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Sat 09 Jul 2022 at 09:11AM -07, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>
>> Anyway I'll give this a test this weekend. It would be *very* nice if
>> we could use this syntax rather than the ugly home-grown one.
>
> Let me know the results of your test, and if it's also continuing to
> work for me by then, I'll install the change. Thanks for taking a look.
I've been testing it with a variety of complex queries for a week now,
and you indicated you were happy with making a change like this, so I've
gone ahead and pushed to master.
--
Sean Whitton
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 8 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.