GNU bug report logs - #56432
run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>

Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 08:38:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Fixed in version 29.1

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #25 received at 56432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: rpluim <at> gmail.com, stefan <at> marxist.se, 56432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 13:37:47 +0300

> Cc: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>, 56432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
> Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:27:52 +0200
> 
> On the other hand, I don't know whether the dig executable is available
> on Windows.

It is, albeit not by default:

  https://phoenixnap.com/kb/dig-windows
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 8 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.