GNU bug report logs - #56432
run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?

Previous Next

Full log

Message #19 received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
To: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>, 56432 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 11:36:06 +0200

close 56432 29.1
thanks

Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> writes:

>     Lars> Looks like `run-dig' should be obsoleted (since it's just a wrapper
>     Lars> around the "dig" program) and has worse output.

Thanks, now done (commit 707124d2b9).

> For extra credit, add a ʼserverʼ arg to a wrapper around `dns-query',
> and obsolete `dig' as well.

This part is left as an exercise for the reader.  ;-)

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.