GNU bug report logs - #56353
sbcl-2.2.6 build fail

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Wensheng Xie <xiewensheng <at> hotmail.com>

Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2022 09:35:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Cc: 56353 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, xiewensheng <at> hotmail.com
Subject: bug#56353: sbcl-2.2.6 build fail
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2022 17:49:48 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org> writes:

> On 2 July 2022 09:29:22 UTC, Wensheng Xie <xiewensheng <at> hotmail.com> wrote:
>>Das Erstellungsprotokoll kann unter „/var/log/guix/drvs/6l/q7dfdfzrlp24lmhj95fcnvkr2mrqfz-sbcl-2.2.6.drv.bz2“ eingesehen werden.
>
>
> This log file is always a good idea to include.

I think this is the equivalent non-grafted derivation:

  https://data.guix.gnu.org/gnu/store/m7xw777v5agldb76gbqkqdvrrlj5d7zy-sbcl-2.2.6.drv

There are plenty of failed builds on bordeaux.guix.gnu.org. I managed to
get it to build successfully once though on my laptop.

Guillaume, any ideas if sbcl <at> 2.2.6 is just really unlikely to build
successfully, or if there's particular conditions for it to build?

Thanks,

Chris
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 19 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.