From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 02 05:34:40 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2022 09:34:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39803 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7ZWS-0002C8-LF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 05:34:40 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49954) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7ZWR-0002Bz-84 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 05:34:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o7ZWR-0003ir-1E for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 05:34:39 -0400 Received: from mail-vi1eur05olkn20831.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([2a01:111:f400:7d00::831]:2017 helo=EUR05-VI1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o7ZWP-0005cW-3s for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 05:34:38 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Pts85U+FGdaCrEmklcW9u5QUwtYu1I5GGu3clWVJDU78bRUgw1TlgsDTk1/5bxAXDr+W4TCNZCLHROWd6VCNRybNlcM53/vlDiW2QEjkv6BVK5l1c9RYhTtpZ/0d6F7jZAcGQuxBdNQFcSmzSVWHkwsapKpqJeG2j/ZT0h9O7UlXJx4Jd85E3dKOCD7S8fbTbASmlFeYVo4wvSu4PnM71YMkl28gTLsCSmIbixViTRBnF0nS2N69pxI2CWtMRop4FsFpZrYC2dS/NHbtI+AnMhZ862nsRGFeLhXnsbK1MliAYVZcja0bGu5Ajs9gjA7zkNUr6x/d89g4hbO566JElA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=CxDssHtwxsqvi7t3655BEGBmMFRNgZtQ8D00EBSbRqo=; b=faWKhJ408RvgDD5tdJsf9CeWVs51Ojp2LTuVra3CPx3K7PbEau0EFqpUX6aYw//PENdFg1yYOAoQmxYYslLb7YkqR3/NM0UD3UR+f4u0zveluviTBpfQMTi7cnblykBIBU6uUTktgMv21C2hNitVULXf2bTOSHYbsp3f2HGLgL4KyUThy5nhMeIHusW3ioP4aJRWryz8Lr6GLUvGBWvKvU5gt3mTIsxQQVqTAwlZt/sTmgZ4/ZP1gHd0b1Tz1BodX0m+yaWPPMZVS8Qu82F9On7pd26jm/3rztUZS5JtiZHY2BDua5z7VbrGj1Te5KP0snhEUcFJZvqoHh/xIVUReA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=CxDssHtwxsqvi7t3655BEGBmMFRNgZtQ8D00EBSbRqo=; b=lCLSPQn6HuJCxVIPrwXHVkvBX+lbb8OQd5Y06nRQx0IKrPamoLqsybU7n027v3j3oPm/7IAKaiMvudQ5QCoVWWep9QMrkD1zzI8CgfQv0X3qrdZjtZ7MwFIxKpHL4jj9piNJuiW4B8c5YTGL8wSpNovUeK3YQb7J3GlKYavTOoJ1lGUhkWGjILW9jGdF9toiCblCmppk8BYi9dCmg6TxupTI7gj/IEGa6NyXUIj4tUrL6pyTza0n2CCE7/OE8E2YKxxEBCNBJt0fP/xbnmWyLwtaxAnNRQ1BJLEnKJVVTss/t08JeOoEFwwAKDTXU4c9aJN3+CgyCjq9PPWICRD0Ug== Received: from AS1P250MB0605.EURP250.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:20b:4af::9) by PR3P250MB0337.EURP250.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:102:17c::10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5395.15; Sat, 2 Jul 2022 09:29:32 +0000 Received: from AS1P250MB0605.EURP250.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::38fb:6675:174:72d]) by AS1P250MB0605.EURP250.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::38fb:6675:174:72d%4]) with mapi id 15.20.5395.018; Sat, 2 Jul 2022 09:29:32 +0000 From: Wensheng Xie To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: sbcl-2.2.6 build fail Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2022 17:29:22 +0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-TMN: [FB2Y3kzxVXI95AjDgo2G6c3YLiGDzEzL] X-ClientProxiedBy: TYCP286CA0106.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:1096:400:29c::13) To AS1P250MB0605.EURP250.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:20b:4af::9) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <87fsjj9825.fsf@hotmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: bb2e1428-6ee9-488f-a1aa-08da5c0d5ea3 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: PR3P250MB0337:EE_ X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: =?utf-8?B?a3VpS1d0QzQxMUJxQ0ZoYmI4R2t2VlVDeC9haWVjSDBRQitqRThjV2p2VUdL?= =?utf-8?B?aW9VM2FraWVjMXNadkJWNzRSQWJHVmVYOGVNZGJrWmxSd2RQSkRQbktGSjRr?= =?utf-8?B?QWczTHJiblJRRlJLbnNQdmxiV2NHOHN6eGljWHZhT1VZMW5makVOeGxjT1JY?= =?utf-8?B?ckR4bk16QThlS1pGT2lXbjJYV09Ya0NZZ1luT1V6eWpaQmVJQS9STnVTQzhS?= =?utf-8?B?ZHBqeDdEeWRucU5xZ2xPTmlPOVVlR2txUzBJd1BqSVhqWGc3VGpJRzZRSk93?= =?utf-8?B?ZXVpY1BueTAvYXFpcFNyYW4zRmJNS1N6aXRJUjAzMi9MTUY5QStBaFdHRnND?= =?utf-8?B?VmJJZmU3MVYvSm52d3Mxc1E4SkMwbFNibFdObHBNaGF1OTU0R1J1bng3V2R5?= =?utf-8?B?YXVTSmFrZWFBT2tTZllrZnBFZkdZTDdJMDFURWZsUlFVZ0F1NTR1Wkp1QWVN?= =?utf-8?B?UWtDazB5bWZlMHhQSHJ1ZktiYi9JR1RTS1c4ZXFtaklqUVI1OS8xM1V5VFEx?= =?utf-8?B?bDkzemtIWVkwVnJlQVVrYUdpdXBJbWZ5SU1UQTlWNHhET2Q2b0dYaHYrTW9W?= =?utf-8?B?RW5NTENVd3ZPZUpXWFl2Rzc0RUVvMis0cDkzLzFFeEhzSndJS09kTjNlbWNF?= =?utf-8?B?cmpqbmN4dCt6eHV6QmZaUWVFVTZMR0pBVXhPbWxUclJuUzJuRWdMaEFFcmEx?= =?utf-8?B?NEFnUkRVOGdKUlR0cDgyOEJGQW9aMUdMYnRId3BCb1NZYUZrc2pnYXkveUFF?= =?utf-8?B?QkpOUytPTkc4bWE4R0J1ZkVPRDJQUURBVXlGMkJ5L3NlbXpocUdOTkRlamlt?= =?utf-8?B?N0pqcDJINXExczRSMXhadlRxYmY0UHBrb0llczJNb0F0OXExaC9OVkt6ZnNv?= =?utf-8?B?THkrbXVxT1JJdWRUWkVQNExhQ1VNU1RhSUdqU0s5WVVDM2c0cEo2TEZaTHJo?= =?utf-8?B?eDIvbHY3dGRTVHZCUi9OUXBKNFJPb054OE5Yd3ZKbWFZenhnNkY3MFRMSVVI?= =?utf-8?B?cUx4T0JnWnFtMlhVQkZaZEMrN2lMSTUxelRvOUlLb0l6SkhTUVZVajhvZnJX?= =?utf-8?B?N3l4a1FEbDBCc0lMbE9IR3lWRDNINjRjUjFkUzE4b0dkbjBvbGE4WFY4WnRW?= =?utf-8?B?MlZkUW9NbHhEbk9vNDg1L1ZvdnovS2RUOG80MTArRUF0dy9qZ0FUY3NkYXhy?= =?utf-8?B?dkFoSG16U3NzWEJiVmlWWGVhdGZLWTJMdjFKbjJIYTFZZWR0MFl2WUhZMXYw?= =?utf-8?B?a1o5LzI5S09pUXRiemkzVWd1SFYrNFEyaU9VSE9GR2s2MFdpRWlvcUNtb1hW?= =?utf-8?B?NjUrTy9iYTc1SzdHTmRwakpwWkcvYXJjaWhWbkQ4K2RJS1k5cEV4K1MzVkdk?= =?utf-8?B?cHZ2RXJNSDZobkxQb3JzenE2V2MvQnJmNmFxQlYzbFEvOTJuSG80bU1qVXdU?= =?utf-8?B?MW1ONk5Rd3VjWDdoald0NFdGajFWVjZubHk1NjQ1RlVpWWpSckk2ckN4amUx?= =?utf-8?B?Vm1sQ2R2bCtHUXFnY21FdGxua0VsN0xqSitqS0ZuTXF2ZS9FMjlRc0lPMER2?= =?utf-8?B?aVBxUTI3cW9JWlE5M014bGFFbWZEZGk0T1BMdFhRa0ZmMkFxem90L1JadzIy?= =?utf-8?B?dXhNbGtLZzlkL1NEa0pJK0wwVzBNRTJNL3pWeUpMMUJ4dFh4aVR1dm9EMzJQ?= =?utf-8?B?OEdNekp6cUw0REJ1UkdXT016blc5ZGtHQXR5Rm9WZHM5OGJvWXpYdSt3PT0=?= X-OriginatorOrg: sct-15-20-4755-11-msonline-outlook-e3d53.templateTenant X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: bb2e1428-6ee9-488f-a1aa-08da5c0d5ea3 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AS1P250MB0605.EURP250.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jul 2022 09:29:32.0658 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PR3P250MB0337 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:111:f400:7d00::831; envelope-from=xiewensheng@hotmail.com; helo=EUR05-VI1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hi, guix: the command: guix package -u log: /gnu/store/6lq7dfdfzrlp24lmhj95fcnvkr2mrqfz-sbcl-2.2.6.drv wird erstellt = =E2=80=A6 - =E2=80=9Ebuild-doc=E2=80=9C-Phasebuilder for `/gnu/store/6lq7dfdfzrlp24lm= hj95fcnvkr2mrqfz-sbcl-2.2.6.drv' failed with exit code 1 Erstellung von /gnu/store/6lq7dfdfzrlp24lmhj95fcnvkr2mrqfz-sbcl-2.2.6.drv f= ehlgeschlagen Das Erstellungsprotokoll kann unter =E2=80=9E/var/log/guix/drvs/6l/q7dfdfzr= lp24lmhj95fcnvkr2mrqfz-sbcl-2.2.6.drv.bz2=E2=80=9C eingesehen werden. guix package: Fehler: build of `/gnu/store/6lq7dfdfzrlp24lmhj95fcnvkr2mrqfz-sbcl-2.2.6.drv' failed This is what I had right. If you need more, please let me know. best regards wxie From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 02 07:40:48 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2022 11:40:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40003 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7bUW-0001bV-1p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 07:40:48 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:40726) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7bUT-0001bN-PF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 07:40:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53094) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o7bUT-0003A0-HT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 07:40:45 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:37302) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o7bUP-0000ct-5S for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 07:40:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=ArD+xjJKEyJVH SowTm2w9tjsh0tCWQKxNd1m6BtVD0E=; h=references:in-reply-to:subject:to: from:date; d=tobias.gr; b=Xq813qUufWR6wlgF7QswYczjEWxj9kHO/YvkPR6s7XiH vroMnm721LllcsD1mgeb0XaMAMBtsJ7mtGxl1MzcEI8XtN+E1lu3XeoNvsLvoOW5lWlmwK iXrVgtLSCHF3NbpA2lG6J/h/aFxCe87eWf8vVscpy6PvNBqdUNwBiEhr4hHnrWkL6XqZW2 oKJ6cRpygMHl3kvxuZGcJmZb3LfPIQagHKWViPr8UPvWWJOnOI+asof4ywgk/BNWTknxYN 1Il7qAdlQlahK6WnrSXozPlbIfFUyLzfo6OlquW7ucydGZkAEaZ4Pb7Vh2TjaNe8Ug1Gp2 nqYLeegjJ1aR1WF0yA== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 0ab2b780 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 2 Jul 2022 11:40:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2022 11:40:37 +0000 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: bug-guix@gnu.org, Wensheng Xie , 56353@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#56353: sbcl-2.2.6 build fail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6B9D52CF-992E-402B-9ABA-4E017804B4A6@tobias.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Autocrypt: addr=me@tobias.gr; keydata= mQINBFVks2ABEACjGBPhWf/qx0L9OhEIrAFTimo5dHa1FLy0AHaHvxmwYSIdJmERYGiNle1rcOvw cFRtu8KJUsrs27Vgoso3qHJpghVitUUf0v3ZuXQT9kfuQLz1Y8pyMzHwVFMLiJVj4Z3y7CJk+xyZ cpSAMbyPINbFVEhsK+z+8ojVGuaiucZkib6b67ySG6Pp1bon8xVvosj71ZRjfXh1t4X8laWO7fQq itT9lmc6DxbE/4vIhR+Vb2MblaA+DyHoNHGGao89h4CO99lfzWzsux41DnEG9d317sJRQTig6Wja EKHXZRA9FbfogD4SDa2uQYCpTJpsVjAyZyu2fuJ+t0zJJ+Ai9qDY87P6hOyd+/n8Eh2Y4TbxJiDo XUT72XY/RfPH1qrMIP3EI/NNL4LQeGG1n+625k3OVWcRVXG2vRrB6qurLmGkLEmjXWCFD9cCRGfH LeajLm9sM+t/nZPZ3btetcmK9tM2EwivyLUNhrTk73UUnI4CSAzdO2cISqo9zSMtFgj2alqd2fOR s7CKfEn+5PquruDbp/Ej7dOOrjgWSCXLDDYXRrtaKrLz/dhqq5ftFYi9tUTTQecFotM08fPtu+Kw JMP2ySHCkUqp0GvrUCeSRPAJZsmJrd535y+LlRhnqb0mbG4dgMa8A6xhkFYugnqldy/q7kX1EmRI 686N7bA6fh1MCQARAQABtCRUb2JpYXMgR2VlcmluY2t4LVJpY2UgPG1lQHRvYmlhcy5ncj6JAlIE EwEKADwCHgECF4ACGQECGwMWIQT1vFU0w28Ah7OdNu8cncT+udt8SwUCXpe0rAYLCQgHCgQFFQoJ CAsFFgMCAQAACgkQHJ3E/rnbfEu5IhAAk+0BW/twLmx1xMmeXn+I7Ne6SG3++0TRBduEaGWV3n59 lX6XPZUQdAPpS4uy0H+c90Owkw+aWUEwfyOWphrxZRtR2cCOP/3Pxj3Vgtz5RkY4u27lMj15jqa/ p7l2l256ZKJOegr9TvOWtkhMp5lxeVHT6f/44Kv/r/8mMCgSnLXYrEWPE462xI+mIJOanHLJb6No f2xLRCvXoLLp7Yejjv1dwOO71R9PMRhtNy46pZM1ylQ++UTkeSocJw4aNtiu0DHOkX9AlNBkutIx x07RpO+MqJKlzzLeQiC/fE5+dR2itRONopwXAqN3MuT7MonQo5XifBn+VK8i9xZWTXZDkWItWtCC 8oIj4zwxwFWiTmMwwSbI3Wdd/11Zw3CLc4Gd0M6NVgvAnuErQXSgr4lrWhZcncvi4L6EJTc9AUSa 8UWPF+S9t+CHTukpJmcYnsccMkOBhT7OZlmWBsylrYK/JTRWqgWSHWdSKmOuLK+MGDneOZEHkEcf jeXRWvmG7MSU5tE/p7NDLIg9vkvhQV9b0q4OtY65uNWbRe2QRJaYMDcYUAeSZzivRa8VaoVen6tb FvH44zpCxubn23ABl9YIzwvJC++r+H2qLdLpy0cfITiZadZ74Ae0aosNw7XARS6OY+A03BfXyPiI 2oW0jf/PdH9sh2mQrQxIQJ5cZz6Z3X0= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) On 2 July 2022 09:29:22 UTC, Wensheng Xie wrote= : >Das Erstellungsprotokoll kann unter =E2=80=9E/var/log/guix/drvs/6l/q7dfdf= zrlp24lmhj95fcnvkr2mrqfz-sbcl-2=2E2=2E6=2Edrv=2Ebz2=E2=80=9C eingesehen wer= den=2E This log file is always a good idea to include=2E If it's more than a few hundred kilobytes compressed, send only the last ~= 300K or so=2E Hi, Kind regards, T G-R Sent on the go=2E Excuse or enjoy my brevity=2E From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 02 12:53:16 2022 Received: (at 56353) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2022 16:53:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42756 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7gMu-0004SK-1k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 12:53:16 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:41352) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7gMs-0004SC-Pa for 56353@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 12:53:15 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8010:68c1:0:54d1:d5d4:280e:f699]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6A0427BBE9; Sat, 2 Jul 2022 17:53:13 +0100 (BST) Received: from felis (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1e9bbb84; Sat, 2 Jul 2022 16:53:13 +0000 (UTC) References: <6B9D52CF-992E-402B-9ABA-4E017804B4A6@tobias.gr> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.10; emacs 28.1 From: Christopher Baines To: Guillaume Le Vaillant , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: bug#56353: sbcl-2.2.6 build fail Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2022 17:49:48 +0100 In-reply-to: <6B9D52CF-992E-402B-9ABA-4E017804B4A6@tobias.gr> Message-ID: <87ilof78y0.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56353 Cc: 56353@debbugs.gnu.org, xiewensheng@hotmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix write= s: > On 2 July 2022 09:29:22 UTC, Wensheng Xie wrote: >>Das Erstellungsprotokoll kann unter =E2=80=9E/var/log/guix/drvs/6l/q7dfdf= zrlp24lmhj95fcnvkr2mrqfz-sbcl-2.2.6.drv.bz2=E2=80=9C eingesehen werden. > > > This log file is always a good idea to include. I think this is the equivalent non-grafted derivation: https://data.guix.gnu.org/gnu/store/m7xw777v5agldb76gbqkqdvrrlj5d7zy-sbcl= -2.2.6.drv There are plenty of failed builds on bordeaux.guix.gnu.org. I managed to get it to build successfully once though on my laptop. Guillaume, any ideas if sbcl@2.2.6 is just really unlikely to build successfully, or if there's particular conditions for it to build? Thanks, Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmLAd/dfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XfyuQ/7BnA3K58n7tAi7FW6RYsYrudbyi9GKgBn Bh8Z9jhvjyb5bA4TcF1WER/SnoMa7ARHxj9k6ZxIowmkyUuSpqyFbk7GzCDbDQA5 YzleMJxiYLKkPwWDaTEXL/VIlbiDEiSvZcW2ielxQEMgwe9Yl1Z3Nd5gU0Y+n+oa koJkYLeKe8Q/n5zqTh6bCsVlsZ9CocS2N//ZOUa2Yri2+hOf2n3XmaaU8DNII/RT PNoToA2L8ABVwsUrj9LCyZOuQ1SRyKunuNI+CQMwgJpsXhhdmchAEv9AiiZ+MYIz ArKlMh7q49VrpjyM2rCaQ7CqQmehwXPtHRqGlT1QiA7ogfOnzbG7Ui3+TQoPGuj1 LkEfpyyeIZNEr2CpMP+zX70+WxUMlP0DEGus6o5EPTA0+fjhLKqxhQGTv4Z9eX36 QiOHjB6S5mKuXbWyL9YaYTS1/q8n5aeA6gmauFKs2ROs4XXuHzgS7CSqeCrDKrj9 7Wv4Sf5+OF4CHEyuADVSTxG9iDhW7IX+RKGWjvcscmsjwLuPYFBxXKYXMd1blLPz E4uvEWGCwjbI51rou21um+RVnZb57fpteWe9yqQODv9Yx4K+3OsthjTx4KDwNS8I XOnJHBHRl4PueRp7EMu2es2yyE3y+IOcKf80hoXpgHeTDwQ4ZIFm8hHBcjxPQxUM w9kvB3n3Gtw= =nuLz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 02 13:21:28 2022 Received: (at 56353) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2022 17:21:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42794 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7goC-0007LF-E7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:21:28 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:52299) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7go8-0007L0-Oz for 56353@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:21:27 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A477240026 for <56353@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 2 Jul 2022 19:21:17 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1656782478; bh=/0XL8NZb3FgYBC2ExrrUS5XOc3tUoMxDyBuLZbvf1oI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=aAEDhiKLakL2V1DAfNqF1dE7BFstbp3vnhLxMBZt5oQY4o2vdTo9CiiMBaHHFFepQ P8llcIGW90YcWV1LygA5JM7Yv6OJY48T3kk0rcOFkYXKHFNDp37cdOIxLN4yVLCmoB D1EAz3UVtITpKi+SW1AwsXpBXQPX5wL0eTVXqz0WCI3L57WwgGyNHfkha1cNcA1oTT a93shPnOEMl+xU1vKV76LerCUwkpZ1pubnByuCGz5bNdVYC9wLm3LiDZvKvtc7kSEE jNXGpNcdM5SuvBGjPKjqZ29N+Ca3AaHoKejmx+38QmeNrdp9pdNh81Pi828BRUwFhf w2I9zrrImlhyg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4LZzPR3smwz9rxD; Sat, 2 Jul 2022 19:21:15 +0200 (CEST) References: <6B9D52CF-992E-402B-9ABA-4E017804B4A6@tobias.gr> <87ilof78y0.fsf@cbaines.net> From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: Christopher Baines Subject: Re: bug#56353: sbcl-2.2.6 build fail Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2022 17:08:53 +0000 In-reply-to: <87ilof78y0.fsf@cbaines.net> Message-ID: <87o7y74eid.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56353 Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , xiewensheng@hotmail.com, 56353@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Christopher Baines skribis: > Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix wri= tes: > >> On 2 July 2022 09:29:22 UTC, Wensheng Xie wrot= e: >>>Das Erstellungsprotokoll kann unter =E2=80=9E/var/log/guix/drvs/6l/q7dfd= fzrlp24lmhj95fcnvkr2mrqfz-sbcl-2.2.6.drv.bz2=E2=80=9C eingesehen werden. >> >> >> This log file is always a good idea to include. > > I think this is the equivalent non-grafted derivation: > > https://data.guix.gnu.org/gnu/store/m7xw777v5agldb76gbqkqdvrrlj5d7zy-sb= cl-2.2.6.drv > > There are plenty of failed builds on bordeaux.guix.gnu.org. I managed to > get it to build successfully once though on my laptop. > > Guillaume, any ideas if sbcl@2.2.6 is just really unlikely to build > successfully, or if there's particular conditions for it to build? > > Thanks, > > Chris According to the logs, the 'build-doc' phase fails to compile the documentation for SIMD related functions. There's a patch disabling this part of the doc unless we compile on x86_64, but maybe not all x86_64 CPUs have the required instructions... Would it be possible to get the result of "lscpu" on some machines where it fails? The build always works on my machine: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Address sizes: 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s): 32 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-31 Vendor ID: AuthenticAMD Model name: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor CPU family: 25 Model: 33 Thread(s) per core: 2 Core(s) per socket: 16 Socket(s): 1 Stepping: 0 Frequency boost: enabled CPU max MHz: 5083.3979 CPU min MHz: 2200.0000 BogoMIPS: 6786.83 Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr p= ge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_o= pt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_go od nopl nonstop_tsc cpuid extd_apicid aperfmperf r= apl pni pclmulqdq monitor ssse3 fma cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 movbe popcnt aes xsa= ve avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm cmp_legacy sv m extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowpr= efetch osvw ibs skinit wdt tce topoext perfctr_core perfctr_nb bpext perfct= r_llc mwaitx cpb cat_l3 cdp_l3 hw_pstate ssbd mba ibrs ibpb stibp vmmcall fsgsbase bmi1 av= x2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid cqm rdt_a rdseed adx smap clflushopt clwb sha_ni = xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1 xsaves cqm_llc c qm_occup_llc cqm_mbm_total cqm_mbm_local clzero ir= perf xsaveerptr rdpru wbnoinvd arat npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save tsc_scale v= mcb_clean flushbyasid decodeassists paus efilter pfthreshold avic v_vmsave_vmload vgif v_sp= ec_ctrl umip pku ospke vaes vpclmulqdq rdpid overflow_recov succor smca fsrm Virtualization features:=20 Virtualization: AMD-V Caches (sum of all):=20=20=20=20=20 L1d: 512 KiB (16 instances) L1i: 512 KiB (16 instances) L2: 8 MiB (16 instances) L3: 64 MiB (2 instances) NUMA:=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 NUMA node(s): 1 NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-31 Vulnerabilities:=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 Itlb multihit: Not affected L1tf: Not affected Mds: Not affected Meltdown: Not affected Mmio stale data: Not affected Spec store bypass: Mitigation; Speculative Store Bypass disabled via = prctl Spectre v1: Mitigation; usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user po= inter sanitization Spectre v2: Mitigation; Retpolines, IBPB conditional, IBRS_FW,= STIBP always-on, RSB filling Srbds: Not affected Tsx async abort: Not affected =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCYsB+ig8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j8kigD/QpcGCWwhlrPx2TCt7VKSI35VVaeGXDg8HgZm 4rPWHk0A/04GjJaRXcrw0g7NDg746WK+UtmPdlw1sKr2fyS3oI6M =hx3k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 02 16:14:49 2022 Received: (at 56353) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2022 20:14:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42928 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7jVw-0003UO-PS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 16:14:49 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:41354) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7jVu-0003UG-QP for 56353@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 16:14:47 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8010:68c1:0:54d1:d5d4:280e:f699]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF0B427BBE9; Sat, 2 Jul 2022 21:14:45 +0100 (BST) Received: from felis (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 63455435; Sat, 2 Jul 2022 20:14:45 +0000 (UTC) References: <6B9D52CF-992E-402B-9ABA-4E017804B4A6@tobias.gr> <87ilof78y0.fsf@cbaines.net> <87o7y74eid.fsf@kitej> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.10; emacs 28.1 From: Christopher Baines To: Guillaume Le Vaillant Subject: Re: bug#56353: sbcl-2.2.6 build fail Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2022 20:26:40 +0100 In-reply-to: <87o7y74eid.fsf@kitej> Message-ID: <87edz36zm5.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56353 Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , 56353@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --==-=-= Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Guillaume Le Vaillant writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > Christopher Baines skribis: > >> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix wr= ites: >> >>> On 2 July 2022 09:29:22 UTC, Wensheng Xie wro= te: >>>>Das Erstellungsprotokoll kann unter =E2=80=9E/var/log/guix/drvs/6l/q7df= dfzrlp24lmhj95fcnvkr2mrqfz-sbcl-2.2.6.drv.bz2=E2=80=9C eingesehen werden. >>> >>> >>> This log file is always a good idea to include. >> >> I think this is the equivalent non-grafted derivation: >> >> https://data.guix.gnu.org/gnu/store/m7xw777v5agldb76gbqkqdvrrlj5d7zy-s= bcl-2.2.6.drv >> >> There are plenty of failed builds on bordeaux.guix.gnu.org. I managed to >> get it to build successfully once though on my laptop. >> >> Guillaume, any ideas if sbcl@2.2.6 is just really unlikely to build >> successfully, or if there's particular conditions for it to build? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Chris > > According to the logs, the 'build-doc' phase fails to compile the > documentation for SIMD related functions. There's a patch disabling this > part of the doc unless we compile on x86_64, but maybe not all x86_64 > CPUs have the required instructions... > > Would it be possible to get the result of "lscpu" on some machines where > it fails? Sure, here is the lscpu output from the bayfront and harbourfront machines. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline; filename=bayfront.lscpu Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: bayfront lscpu output Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Address sizes: 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s): 32 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-31 Vendor ID: AuthenticAMD Model name: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6278 CPU family: 21 Model: 1 Thread(s) per core: 2 Core(s) per socket: 8 Socket(s): 2 Stepping: 2 Frequency boost: enabled CPU max MHz: 2400.0000 CPU min MHz: 1400.0000 BogoMIPS: 4799.96 Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr p= ge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_o= pt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_go od nopl nonstop_tsc cpuid extd_apicid amd_dcm aper= fmperf pni pclmulqdq monitor ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes xsave avx = lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legac y abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs xop= skinit wdt lwp fma4 topoext perfctr_core perfctr_nb cpb hw_pstate ssbd vmm= call arat npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save ts c_scale vmcb_clean flushbyasid decodeassists pause= filter pfthreshold Virtualization features:=20 Virtualization: AMD-V Caches (sum of all):=20=20=20=20=20 L1d: 512 KiB (32 instances) L1i: 1 MiB (16 instances) L2: 32 MiB (16 instances) L3: 24 MiB (4 instances) NUMA:=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 NUMA node(s): 4 NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-7 NUMA node1 CPU(s): 8-15 NUMA node2 CPU(s): 16-23 NUMA node3 CPU(s): 24-31 Vulnerabilities:=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 Itlb multihit: Not affected L1tf: Not affected Mds: Not affected Meltdown: Not affected Spec store bypass: Mitigation; Speculative Store Bypass disabled via = prctl and seccomp Spectre v1: Mitigation; usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user po= inter sanitization Spectre v2: Mitigation; Full AMD retpoline, STIBP disabled, RS= B filling Srbds: Not affected Tsx async abort: Not affected --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline; filename=harbourfront.lscpu Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: harbourfront lscpu Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Address sizes: 38 bits physical, 48 bits virtual Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s): 8 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-7 Vendor ID: GenuineIntel Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5420 @ 2.50GHz CPU family: 6 Model: 23 Thread(s) per core: 1 Core(s) per socket: 4 Socket(s): 2 Stepping: 10 BogoMIPS: 4987.55 Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pg= e mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht tm pbe syscall n= x lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts=20 rep_good nopl cpuid aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor d= s_cpl est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 xsave lahf_lm pti dtherm Caches (sum of all):=20=20=20=20 L1d: 256 KiB (8 instances) L1i: 256 KiB (8 instances) L2: 24 MiB (4 instances) NUMA:=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 NUMA node(s): 1 NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-7 Vulnerabilities:=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 Itlb multihit: KVM: Mitigation: VMX unsupported L1tf: Mitigation; PTE Inversion Mds: Vulnerable: Clear CPU buffers attempted, no microco= de; SMT disabled Meltdown: Mitigation; PTI Spec store bypass: Vulnerable Spectre v1: Mitigation; usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user poi= nter sanitization Spectre v2: Mitigation; Full generic retpoline, STIBP disabled,= RSB filling Srbds: Not affected Tsx async abort: Not affected --=-=-=-- --==-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmLApzJfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XfMwg/9HLPaRfeISaH8839BcocICzp93ka8Sy+P sb9jYNFVaPh+xNsjRwQDSoaDEFR2gj0hmZHqRxjVCQHGufAP7d4jhSFeSjsJ+BsI emwT4MzB8Fv8YKNtoIeiaSkV39PlLqZYT1vG1sHF+nezkspyCAf3Akppx6JNat+R 0eYZh9RREoDxTV40cOLKdV6KS9CpqMXr+O32pXqgWKTElEcbfGJp7tT4+qZg8knE nRlWEcPfLMqHOS32E1B7Hw2zY8EKzzGxPhm1pddJgAvYIJyr60siSn/KC8nrBxHy la3vpZD2Ne5JFrPHEPmSQhTZBfgf5e0WKbpeNKD5ORQKRkSVe7L5H7WwbscLaOw3 +Wm/euZzpFMnbZwiVMxjtOzSS54VaKSLddkFMJbh6ImnAXnlib0QJ+a3vHaOX2PM kLKxc6bXapk4SUAntIHRut9ZtWpvh3x2MsqEru5npb8TMKTLe2cEgM2CJ+Y8tQRm 33THDGX+omfuUAvlIM0RjFw4ptsYtBq61gye+2QzqOOZw//rPtpzC+tSROmzjJRz 7ICWfWkwPJFGx5YF+jW65ZP2+5dnZjJ3Lmvp3U90mE2iemICNggIJXWGsuFN7RfV jPsZ3bkXKyo18+btRNqXmagV533HBwLBuZi49K7tVq1LEGJAiEFL8NViQB+uSvNg mDQOLlrg6eo= =u0eA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 03 04:33:49 2022 Received: (at 56353) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2022 08:33:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43254 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7v36-0005bU-PR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2022 04:33:49 -0400 Received: from mailout.easymail.ca ([64.68.200.34]:37494) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7v32-0005bE-MW for 56353@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2022 04:33:48 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout.easymail.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71676223F; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 08:33:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bokr.com; s=easymail; t=1656837218; bh=iny2V9/4RqtuvfJdARfYz2vrI4ldCD1uuqDksbWVkLA=; h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=W02RIwfDjNbAC93CulVUcQAzWgtFDglaububMFJ4q0JqrgoVGSGjmbeczQOCTZDeA 7YmbqAX7FDOr0ATD12Llve6PAi7i0EUe+SPy24SybCH48kf/dsEXpoDRllFY9cow0z BeCZ0Tndxukp/xjPkc9kWtiHMjAVVL4xWq+UFtTFcs/Udjg7iP2k7B4W+TKaABfGjI 1SxSCadj43dGPtiF7AIRVp3i84vfLNtD2aepTDoNu/G6rdLPE0gj5X0+sbPWd7ZHwL +B6gJWNRjt90mmKz1ZSZ5q8MkVMsH0DuXJqQgJtGTjoGu620kPFInL5qEHIdnUzMsb 994UmoiIbkViQ== X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at emo09-pco.easydns.vpn Received: from mailout.easymail.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (emo09-pco.easydns.vpn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c5GH8XZ8ctDt; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 08:33:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (m83-185-45-117.cust.tele2.se [83.185.45.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mailout.easymail.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D890621E4; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 08:33:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bokr.com; s=easymail; t=1656837218; bh=iny2V9/4RqtuvfJdARfYz2vrI4ldCD1uuqDksbWVkLA=; h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=W02RIwfDjNbAC93CulVUcQAzWgtFDglaububMFJ4q0JqrgoVGSGjmbeczQOCTZDeA 7YmbqAX7FDOr0ATD12Llve6PAi7i0EUe+SPy24SybCH48kf/dsEXpoDRllFY9cow0z BeCZ0Tndxukp/xjPkc9kWtiHMjAVVL4xWq+UFtTFcs/Udjg7iP2k7B4W+TKaABfGjI 1SxSCadj43dGPtiF7AIRVp3i84vfLNtD2aepTDoNu/G6rdLPE0gj5X0+sbPWd7ZHwL +B6gJWNRjt90mmKz1ZSZ5q8MkVMsH0DuXJqQgJtGTjoGu620kPFInL5qEHIdnUzMsb 994UmoiIbkViQ== From: bokr@bokr.com Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2022 10:33:25 +0200 To: Christopher Baines Subject: Re: bug#56353: sbcl-2.2.6 build fail Message-ID: <20220703083325.GA40670@LionPure> References: <6B9D52CF-992E-402B-9ABA-4E017804B4A6@tobias.gr> <87ilof78y0.fsf@cbaines.net> <87o7y74eid.fsf@kitej> <87edz36zm5.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87edz36zm5.fsf@cbaines.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56353 Cc: Guillaume Le Vaillant , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , 56353@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, On +2022-07-02 20:26:40 +0100, Christopher Baines wrote: > > Guillaume Le Vaillant writes: > > > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > > Christopher Baines skribis: > > > >> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes: > >> > >>> On 2 July 2022 09:29:22 UTC, Wensheng Xie wrote: > >>>>Das Erstellungsprotokoll kann unter „/var/log/guix/drvs/6l/q7dfdfzrlp24lmhj95fcnvkr2mrqfz-sbcl-2.2.6.drv.bz2“ eingesehen werden. > >>> > >>> > >>> This log file is always a good idea to include. > >> > >> I think this is the equivalent non-grafted derivation: > >> > >> https://data.guix.gnu.org/gnu/store/m7xw777v5agldb76gbqkqdvrrlj5d7zy-sbcl-2.2.6.drv > >> > >> There are plenty of failed builds on bordeaux.guix.gnu.org. I managed to > >> get it to build successfully once though on my laptop. > >> > >> Guillaume, any ideas if sbcl@2.2.6 is just really unlikely to build > >> successfully, or if there's particular conditions for it to build? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Chris > > > > According to the logs, the 'build-doc' phase fails to compile the > > documentation for SIMD related functions. There's a patch disabling this > > part of the doc unless we compile on x86_64, but maybe not all x86_64 > > CPUs have the required instructions... > > > > Would it be possible to get the result of "lscpu" on some machines where > > it fails? > > Sure, here is the lscpu output from the bayfront and harbourfront > machines. > [...] I wonder what running this at the time builds failed would have shown: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- #/usr/bin/bash # ~/bin/top-1-sans-hilights -- single snap of top without highlight escapes (no top opt for that??) top -n 1 | \ sed -e 's:[\r][^\r]*[\r]\+::g' -e 's:[\x07\r]::g' -e 's:.\x08::g' \ -e 's:\x1B\[[^a-zA-Z]*[a-zA-Z]\x0f*::g' \ -e 's:\xe2\x80\x98:":g' -e 's:\xe2\x80\x99:":g' --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- (no guarantees on my hack to get rid of the highlighting escapes and utf8->ascii quote subst :) (top seems to assume even -n 1 output is always going to interactive dest) Anyway, wondering: Could memory and CPU loading at the time have triggered the build failure? -- Regards, Bengt Richter From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 03 05:00:04 2022 Received: (at 56353) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2022 09:00:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43263 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7vSW-0006Fr-BA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2022 05:00:04 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:57573) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7vST-0006Eo-PJ for 56353@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2022 05:00:02 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7141C240026 for <56353@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 10:59:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1656838795; bh=mlrexbIqtDWDeOXXsZAhFww7Jx4473HdrYIYVBVCnnA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=r8iXhqsxG3F7Tl6hg+fJlZYavny8/yZKstooXU4OCsvHK9FM5kdYXjIarUA4O2QA1 BHRBrU364ZdcuKTYel3aEMEa/8kMfNFuxkvR+bF+9JNln+qiMMJoDaqNgKzCkvto55 LoPhsb4ym46je7tL+2TnWE1v47e9U5DPUVH8B1vsXzni/Gb4WK1k87WmEDMnH0ZN0H L0ifAndWNEiyNKbVIM1hPXbdZ5gu+HG6GA3kR1cHR/LunmMPm5ch8y1uj5+T8bH73A KY8T+n2ERlVynozS2oMLwKQuNFAq5wNn+OR8RFhU8+k4O+o+0mfdkniS0SJDU0agWM onIpdceD7ls9g== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4LbNDV21HPz6tm6; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 10:59:53 +0200 (CEST) References: <6B9D52CF-992E-402B-9ABA-4E017804B4A6@tobias.gr> <87ilof78y0.fsf@cbaines.net> <87o7y74eid.fsf@kitej> <87edz36zm5.fsf@cbaines.net> <20220703083325.GA40670@LionPure> From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: bokr@bokr.com Subject: Re: bug#56353: sbcl-2.2.6 build fail Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2022 08:51:38 +0000 In-reply-to: <20220703083325.GA40670@LionPure> Message-ID: <8735fir2pi.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56353 Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , Christopher Baines , 56353@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain bokr@bokr.com skribis: > I wonder what running this at the time builds failed would have shown: > > #/usr/bin/bash > # ~/bin/top-1-sans-hilights -- single snap of top without highlight escapes (no top opt for that??) > top -n 1 | \ > sed -e 's:[\r][^\r]*[\r]\+::g' -e 's:[\x07\r]::g' -e 's:.\x08::g' \ > -e 's:\x1B\[[^a-zA-Z]*[a-zA-Z]\x0f*::g' \ > -e 's:\xe2\x80\x98:":g' -e 's:\xe2\x80\x99:":g' > > (no guarantees on my hack to get rid of the highlighting escapes > and utf8->ascii quote subst :) > (top seems to assume even -n 1 output is always going to interactive dest) > > Anyway, wondering: Could memory and CPU loading at the time > have triggered the build failure? I don't think so. It looks like the SB-SIMD optional module only gets built on x86_64 CPUs supporting AVX2 instructions. The Bayfront and Harbourfront machines don't, and this is why the 'build-doc' phase fails when trying to load SB-SIMD to compile its documentation. I'm testing a patch disabling SB-SIMD, and I'll push it if all goes well. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCYsFaiQ8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j+lNgEAlSSNR6baqhAu+gDqjgi8l3E9WO1HsjZkMt10 snhdVogA/iyHouKmQVeqhRKh2Kg+9sQYPLzyLhcIbjMHDsgZX4GZ =vKCC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 03 06:12:52 2022 Received: (at 56353-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2022 10:12:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43342 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7wak-0001oa-HQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2022 06:12:52 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:37257) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7wah-0001oI-S1 for 56353-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2022 06:12:36 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A14D924010A for <56353-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 12:12:29 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1656843149; bh=Rwnw4ineesMOBvmov8ADKX3OhUPuU5QIGID09TZiBY8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=iDR49xABXDq2Ca2g1flvsaN8Y0TZeoF0pNljFItw2x9HIcvyoKcNJxHfrxQMmP141 GXQoNbmfnQ8yIMCrccK9ucG2IYBIr9A4CUBxptjGCtR1pjm4tKAbry4/LXTgTdwfcd v9mlDaooQcycEFDH11YQWdfXNE0iJgR/w+abpu9/31sfuBe4H3ZojddXkwxE0U1laZ A8mCo8F3EfcyHmN3K4FEUXz8Gm2U/0Atti1qPYredjzni0lWsAQ2wrMygiAFvly/nQ +97/CC3AH+81yTzetl7Q4zPAqL4Yms+0Q8712CtTO35l1B7Exn0wYPSMELEZAtChhg HuEsd2Qo8MwLg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4LbPrD0xpdz6tm6; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 12:12:28 +0200 (CEST) References: <6B9D52CF-992E-402B-9ABA-4E017804B4A6@tobias.gr> <87ilof78y0.fsf@cbaines.net> <87o7y74eid.fsf@kitej> <87edz36zm5.fsf@cbaines.net> <20220703083325.GA40670@LionPure> <8735fir2pi.fsf@kitej> From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: 56353-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#56353: sbcl-2.2.6 build fail Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2022 10:09:10 +0000 In-reply-to: <8735fir2pi.fsf@kitej> Message-ID: <87y1xapks4.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56353-done Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , Christopher Baines , bokr@bokr.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Guillaume Le Vaillant skribis: > bokr@bokr.com skribis: > >> I wonder what running this at the time builds failed would have shown: >> >> #/usr/bin/bash >> # ~/bin/top-1-sans-hilights -- single snap of top without highlight escapes (no top opt for that??) >> top -n 1 | \ >> sed -e 's:[\r][^\r]*[\r]\+::g' -e 's:[\x07\r]::g' -e 's:.\x08::g' \ >> -e 's:\x1B\[[^a-zA-Z]*[a-zA-Z]\x0f*::g' \ >> -e 's:\xe2\x80\x98:":g' -e 's:\xe2\x80\x99:":g' >> >> (no guarantees on my hack to get rid of the highlighting escapes >> and utf8->ascii quote subst :) >> (top seems to assume even -n 1 output is always going to interactive dest) >> >> Anyway, wondering: Could memory and CPU loading at the time >> have triggered the build failure? > > I don't think so. It looks like the SB-SIMD optional module only gets > built on x86_64 CPUs supporting AVX2 instructions. The Bayfront and > Harbourfront machines don't, and this is why the 'build-doc' phase fails > when trying to load SB-SIMD to compile its documentation. > > I'm testing a patch disabling SB-SIMD, and I'll push it if all goes > well. Patch pushed as e0d2f8164e6a1c15fdcae6f7dadb05c0c9e25352. Closing. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCYsFriw8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j/5dQD9EDVMQjAI8uX+UJIPLNKxsnOSJ21GyprR0ziJ edM1vkUA/R6/X7fV26ZArk3+IKjflUWRZCccAZDqz05uotTlXE30 =iIAd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:26:26 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2022 11:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator