GNU bug report logs - #56334
Should asdf-build-system/sbcl use load-system instead of compile-system?

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>

Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 10:18:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #52 received at 56334-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: 56334-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Should asdf-build-system/sbcl use load-system instead of
 compile-system?
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 14:49:18 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> skribis:

> I'll be the road for a while, unable to work on this patch, so if anyone
> wants to work on it and merge, please go ahead :)
>
> Left to do:
>
> - Suggestion: add a keyword to choose between asdf:compile-system and
>   asdf:load-system (default should be asdf:load-system).
> - Make sure sbcl-stumpwm-kbd-layouts usees asdf:compile-system.
> - Rebuild the Lisp world to test.

I added a 'asd-operation' keyword parameter with a default value of
"load-system", and I used it in the package definition of
sbcl-stumpwm-kbd-layouts to use "compile-system" instead.

Patches pushed as 6b5ef03a2582ab23228478018fd356e17db1daea and
following.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 347 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.