GNU bug report logs - #56334
Should asdf-build-system/sbcl use load-system instead of compile-system?

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>

Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 10:18:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 56334 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#56334: Should asdf-build-system/sbcl use load-system instead of compile-system?
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 10:56:49 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
While we are rebuilding the Lisp world, I suggest we remove Coreutils
from the SBCL closure since it's only needed on LispWorks and on
non-Linux:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(add-after 'install 'remove-coreutils-references
           ;; They are only useful on non-Linux, non-SBCL.
           (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
             (let* ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out"))
                    (share-dir (string-append out "/share/sbcl/")))
               (substitute* (string-append share-dir "src/code/run-program.lisp")
                 (("\\(run-program \".*uname\"")
                  "(run-program \"uname\""))
               (substitute* (string-append share-dir "contrib/asdf/asdf.lisp")
                 (("\\(\".*/usr/bin/env\"")
                  "(\"/usr/bin/env\""))
               (substitute* (string-append share-dir "contrib/asdf/uiop.lisp")
                 (("\\(\".*/usr/bin/env\"")
                  "(\"/usr/bin/env\""))

               #t)))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 293 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.