GNU bug report logs - #56334
Should asdf-build-system/sbcl use load-system instead of compile-system?

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>

Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 10:18:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #35 received at 56334 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: 56334 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Should asdf-build-system/sbcl use load-system instead of
 compile-system?
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2022 10:19:53 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> skribis:

> Robert Goldman from ASDF found out why the "COMPONENT not found" issue happens:
>
> https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/asdf/asdf/-/issues/119#note_9808
>
> So either we fix most of the Prove-depending libraries, or we just do
> what's expected from every one, that is, add the directory to the ASDF
> registries.
>
> The latter is much easier of course...

As adding the build directory to ASDF's registry is easier and also
simplifies asdf-build-system, would should do that. And we could still
open issues upstream for libraries that are starting their test suites
in a wrong way.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 293 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.