GNU bug report logs -
#56218
[PATCH] guix: inferior: Fix the behaviour of open-inferior #:error-port.
Previous Next
Reported by: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2022 17:19:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report
#56218: [PATCH] guix: inferior: Fix the behaviour of open-inferior #:error-port.
which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.
The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 56218 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
--
56218: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=56218
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>>> + (dup2 (if (file-port? (current-error-port))
>>>> + (fileno (current-error-port))
>>>> + (open-fdes "/dev/null" O_WRONLY))
>>>> + 2)
>>>
>>> If (current-error-port) wraps FD 2 when the function is called, then, by
>>> the time we reach (dup2 … 2), the FD behind (current-error-port) has be
>>> closed; we end up doing (dup2 2 2), but FD 2 is closed, so we get EBADF.
>>>
>>> Or am I misunderstanding?
>>
>> That sounds reasonable, I've only tested this change in the scenario
>> when the #:error-port isn't stderr, and I mostly adapted this from what
>> I thought open-pipe* did.
>>
>> Maxime suggested using move->fdes, so maybe this would be an improved
>> version:
>>
>> ;; Mimic 'open-pipe*'.
>> (if (file-port? (current-error-port))
>> (unless (eq? (fileno (current-error-port)) 2)
>> (move-fdes (current-error-port) 2))
>> (move->fdes (open-file "/dev/null" O_WRONLY) 2))
>
> I prefer the original version: I find it clearer (it’s low-level) and
> probably more robust (thinking through the port/FD interaction needs is
> more demanding :-)).
>
>>> Perhaps we should add one test for each case (error port is a file port
>>> vs. error port is another kind of port) in ‘tests/inferior.scm’.
>>
>> Yep, sounds good.
>
> To sum up: I think it’s a welcome change, and it’s even more welcome
> with a couple of tests to make sure it behaves the way we think it does.
I've gone ahead and pushed a fix plus some tests as
a9fd06121240c78071a398dd1e0ddb47553f3809.
The tests probably aren't great, but I think the do cover the
#:error-port behaviour.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
This should be the error port used by the inferior process, but currently it's
either stderr if #:error-port is a file port, or /dev/null otherwise.
I'm looking at this as the Guix Data Service uses this behaviour to record and
display logs from inferior processes.
* guix/inferior.scm (open-bidirectional-pipe): Call dup2 for file descriptor
2, passing either the file number for the current error port, or a file
descriptor for /dev/null.
---
guix/inferior.scm | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/guix/inferior.scm b/guix/inferior.scm
index 54200b75e4..e36806ac84 100644
--- a/guix/inferior.scm
+++ b/guix/inferior.scm
@@ -156,12 +156,14 @@ (define (open-bidirectional-pipe command . args)
(close-port parent)
(close-fdes 0)
(close-fdes 1)
+ (close-fdes 2)
(dup2 (fileno child) 0)
(dup2 (fileno child) 1)
;; Mimic 'open-pipe*'.
- (unless (file-port? (current-error-port))
- (close-fdes 2)
- (dup2 (open-fdes "/dev/null" O_WRONLY) 2))
+ (dup2 (if (file-port? (current-error-port))
+ (fileno (current-error-port))
+ (open-fdes "/dev/null" O_WRONLY))
+ 2)
(apply execlp command command args))
(lambda ()
(primitive-_exit 127))))
--
2.36.1
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 318 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.