GNU bug report logs -
#56171
Request for marking DEF entry when using completing-read
Previous Next
Reported by: carlmarcos <at> tutanota.com
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 19:10:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: moreinfo, wontfix
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Jun 24, 2022, 16:14 by drew.adams <at> oracle.com:
>> > It is a different thing than that. I customarily using the `up' and
>> > `down' key to move through the collection of entries. Could there be
>> > some form of indicator (e.g. highlight, underline, some other means)
>> > that will tell me that is was selected as the default by the package
>> > designer? Currently I see no distinction, with all entries in
>> > collection as just an entry like any other.
>>
>> Again, what's the use case? Why do you want the default to be singled
>> out in some way?
>>
>
> I'm curious too. I don't say it couldn't be useful,
> but I wonder what the aim is.
>
Wouldn't one normally associate a default with some sensible setting worth looking
into most times? Perhaps this could be a user setting.
> BTW, note that the default value (or even any of a
> list of default values) provided need not be among
> the candidates for completion, if completion is lax
> (REQUIRE-MATCH = nil). E.g.:
>
> (completing-read "q: " '("a" "b" "c" "d")
> nil nil nil nil "e")
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 306 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.