GNU bug report logs - #5613
23.1.92; mode-line-format is wrong for `about-emacs'

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 00:00:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: "'Chong Yidong'" <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
Cc: 5613 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#5613: 23.1.92; mode-line-format is wrong for `about-emacs'
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 07:55:05 -0800
> Thanks, I've checked in a fix.
> 
> BTW, please don't send to both bug-gnu-emacs and
> emacs-pretest-bug---they redirect to the same address, and 
> this creates two bug entries.

Thanks. Yes, it was a mistake (didn't realize it would create two bug reports).

FYI, this was due to these two things:

1. You have stopped posting Windows binaries.

2. The regression (bug #5299) in `report-emacs-bug' on Windows. (This was
reported in a previous pretest.)

Because of these two changes, I had to compose my mail by hand and use a build
from Lennart. That build does not use `emacs-pretest-bug <at> gnu.org' as the
destination; it uses `bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org'. And I wasn't (still am not) sure
which address to use. So I used both, so you would understand/notice that the
bug is for the latest development code.

Between no longer providing Windows binaries and breaking `report-emacs-bug',
you certainly have made it harder for ordinary Emacs users (on Windows) to
communicate about bugs.

Which address is correct, or doesn't it matter? Thx.






This bug report was last modified 15 years and 174 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.