GNU bug report logs - #56094
[PATCH] gnu: Remove unnecessary sway dependency on elogind.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: muradm <mail <at> muradm.net>

Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2022 14:40:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #28 received at 56094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: muradm <mail <at> muradm.net>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> ist.tugraz.at>
Cc: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 56094 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gnu: wm: Switch sway from elogind to basu.
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 12:38:01 +0300
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Next one reflecting changes.

Yes, necessary to state basu explicitly, meson.build detects
like systemd -> elogind -> basu. While removed from sway
dependencies, elogind still comes from dependencies of
dependencies.

--
muradm

Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> ist.tugraz.at> writes:

> block 56094 by 56136
> thanks
>
> Am Mittwoch, dem 22.06.2022 um 12:27 +0300 schrieb muradm:
>> * gnu/packages/wm.scm (basu): Switch sway from elogind to basu.
> Should be sway.
>> [inputs]: Replace elogind with basu for sd-bus library 
>> dependency.
> This can be simplified to "Replace ‘elogind’ with ‘basu’."
>> [arguments]: Use G-expressions.
> Actually, you don't, and even if, that ought to be a separate 
> commit.
>> <#:configure-flags>: Request building against basu.
> Is this necessary?  Doesn't sway have autodetection for basu?
>
>
> Cheers

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 47 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.