GNU bug report logs - #56051

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>

Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 06:55:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #23 received at 56051 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
Cc: 56051 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#56051] [PATCH] guix: self: Do not record reference to
 gcc-toolchain.
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 21:08:18 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Julien Lepiller schreef op za 18-06-2022 om 19:53 [+0200]:
> crt1.o and friends, from glibc. I tried using glibc explicitely and
> setting LIBRARY_PATH to (file-append glibc "/lib") and it worked.
> 
> > 
> > > Another possibility is to explicitely use gcc, binutils, glibc and
> > > ld-wrapper. Thought this would be better?  
> > 
> > FWIW, the <c-compiler> infrastructure in (guix scripts pack) does
> > that, and the code in guix/self.scm has a comment:
> > 
> >      ;; XXX: Reuse <c-compiler> from (guix scripts pack) instead?
> > 
> > though maybe (guix scripts pack) has the same reference-keeping
> > problem ...
> > 
> > Greetings,
> > Maxime.
> 
> Mh, I'm not sure how to do that. Do you mind if I push this patch, and
> leave using <c-compiler> to future work?

Sure, but keep in mind this adds 'glibc' to the closure (IIUC, packages
like 'hello' use a different glibc, from %final-inputs in (gnu packages
commencement)), so maybe best use (canonical-package glibc) instead?
(*)

(*) IIUC, (guix self) isn't used from any package module, so no cycle
problems, can be imported directly.

Greetings,
Maxime
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 26 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.