GNU bug report logs - #56051

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>

Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 06:55:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #17 received at 56051 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>, 56051 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#56051] [PATCH] guix: self: Do not record reference to
 gcc-toolchain.
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 19:23:28 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Julien Lepiller schreef op za 18-06-2022 om 14:13 [+0200]:
> On June 18, 2022 11:45:43 AM GMT+02:00, Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be> wrote:
> > Julien Lepiller schreef op za 18-06-2022 om 08:58 [+0200]:
> > >            (setenv "LIBRARY_PATH" #$(file-append gcc "/lib"))
> > 
> > I'm wondering if is this line that is incorrect, given that the
> > 'gcc:out' store item does not have a /lib subdirectory.  Would removing
> > this line be sufficient?
> > 
> > Greetings,
> > Maxime.
> 
> Removing this line I get a message that gcc can't find crt*.o.

Which crt are these? crt1.o, crti.o, crtn.o (from glibc) or crtbegin.o,
crtend.o, crtprec64.o, ... (from gcc)?

> Another possibility is to explicitely use gcc, binutils, glibc and
> ld-wrapper. Thought this would be better?

FWIW, the <c-compiler> infrastructure in (guix scripts pack) does that,
and the code in guix/self.scm has a comment:

    ;; XXX: Reuse <c-compiler> from (guix scripts pack) instead?

though maybe (guix scripts pack) has the same reference-keeping problem
...

Greetings,
Maxime.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 25 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.