From unknown Fri Aug 15 12:53:07 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#56051 <56051@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#56051 <56051@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Reply-To: bug#56051 <56051@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 19:53:07 +0000 reassign 56051 guix-patches submitter 56051 Julien Lepiller severity 56051 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 18 02:54:55 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2022 06:54:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47429 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2SLw-0000oI-TX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 02:54:55 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:40568) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2SLu-0000o9-AE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 02:54:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54972) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o2SLt-00047r-KQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 02:54:37 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([2a00:5884:8208::1]:58226) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o2SLq-00084W-KA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 02:54:37 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id b37179fd; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 06:46:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; s=dkim; bh=sGE/yvgnA1SjXEQDakGXYpWm3 r1ChcObDGFLfXBEPCc=; b=Sd/J9CBhUwc9+JcNluSe8zBoap/+2u3tS9GW3vHDU 1Uk45/aAS40LE2zHKeet/7XHyfMh1BT5wd4dZoHih1QpaG54IMV7SiGimPD8ILSu 4rWuXynxdfYC42NwVqhAnVcKMi/bT9F261npb6G09yrYN6HHu6Syp30/yVeMryW4 HgfU00GmJXoJCq3kT6WB3pskKhto93aLdfPiozFVX0QeCjUrc0bntlVQQJbf/EMJ r7w2T5oncDOrLa3tlYYacUYaSeX5MtLhfxtKDVKaNWfL3qjBiEbTmh4V8V/nNP2b 1biUpR2Am+6sOdvKCWA+oityFWyj0LjKS0lME4IDMEf+w== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a0f28e66 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 18 Jun 2022 06:46:46 +0000 (UTC) From: Julien Lepiller To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 08:46:32 +0200 Message-Id: <20220618064632.29319-1-julien@lepiller.eu> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:5884:8208::1; envelope-from=julien@lepiller.eu; helo=lepiller.eu X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Hi@lepiller.eu, Guix!@lepiller.eu X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: This patch ensures that we don't record a reference to gcc-toolchain in the result of `guix pull`. With this, we save 150 MB of closure. This is a patch to fix the first issue I found in https://issues.guix.gnu.org/56030. Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR SPF: test of HELO record failed (temperror) 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager This patch ensures that we don't record a reference to gcc-toolchain in the result of `guix pull`. With this, we save 150 MB of closure. This is a patch to fix the first issue I found in https://issues.guix.gnu.org/56030. >From f96742e204f6b98401f49f7d1066257d7355c873 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julien Lepiller Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 08:17:59 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] guix: self: Do not record reference to gcc-toolchain. The ld-wrapper from gcc-toolchain records a reference to the library path through rpath, but this is not needed. By explicitely using rpath flags instead, we save 150 MB of closure. * guix/self.scm (quiet-guile): Do not record reference to gcc-toolchain. --- guix/self.scm | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/guix/self.scm b/guix/self.scm index 9a64051c32..36ada4d171 100644 --- a/guix/self.scm +++ b/guix/self.scm @@ -569,10 +569,12 @@ (define build (filter package? packages)))) ":")) (setenv "LIBRARY_PATH" #$(file-append gcc "/lib")) + (setenv "GUIX_LD_WRAPPER_DISABLE_RPATH" "1") (invoke "gcc" #$(local-file source) "-Wall" "-g0" "-O2" "-I" #$(file-append guile "/include/guile/" effective) "-L" #$(file-append guile "/lib") + "-Wl,-rpath" #$(file-append guile "/lib") #$(string-append "-lguile-" effective) "-o" (string-append #$output "/bin/guile"))))) -- 2.35.1 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 18 02:58:22 2022 Received: (at 56051) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2022 06:58:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47439 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2SPV-0000uX-Pe for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 02:58:21 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:40808) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2SPT-0000uN-H6 for 56051@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 02:58:19 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id b9c7e2f1 for <56051@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 06:58:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=dkim; bh=0V9BHttU6csfAa3hJPzlr56Oy7TrBl7k2OIrAiEShr4=; b=D9iS hGTvdVOBoWk75EeKfDN1z9+PLs/nm3+u1b6mEgDjEXsf12DcJJEM045VGr1SB1AY YrMEbmJG22o2ZNdFmgVSSQoSVYfibej2i9DvOvTD0/QdbYTIZIC9pXzwUQ+ajy7g UAWCAHeN7yn6M+5zmVsT/H4WzyHAjsPtACaMNpkzkriLeZBq93UkPidJpOg/I7CO zUez5yFtw8RZ1CdWpOFSwRKZR202PQpgiH2swhCLu14c3VIGIlb2wcwihyHkzncR dsFDwc66O/5anAwSQE6Am7Yy4JzBuAm18cUotVBAcpvLW1T9YaA8EM4AP95zk6Tr WztqlGJeoZ1Cbr5u5Q== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 90e73140 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for <56051@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 06:58:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Julien Lepiller To: 56051@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] guix: self: Do not record reference to gcc-toolchain. Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 08:58:10 +0200 Message-Id: <20220618065810.30767-1-julien@lepiller.eu> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56051 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) The ld-wrapper from gcc-toolchain records a reference to the library path through rpath, but this is not needed. By explicitely using rpath flags instead, we save 150 MB of closure. * guix/self.scm (quiet-guile): Do not record reference to gcc-toolchain. --- guix/self.scm | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/guix/self.scm b/guix/self.scm index 9a64051c32..36ada4d171 100644 --- a/guix/self.scm +++ b/guix/self.scm @@ -569,10 +569,12 @@ (define build (filter package? packages)))) ":")) (setenv "LIBRARY_PATH" #$(file-append gcc "/lib")) + (setenv "GUIX_LD_WRAPPER_DISABLE_RPATH" "1") (invoke "gcc" #$(local-file source) "-Wall" "-g0" "-O2" "-I" #$(file-append guile "/include/guile/" effective) "-L" #$(file-append guile "/lib") + "-Wl,-rpath" #$(file-append guile "/lib") #$(string-append "-lguile-" effective) "-o" (string-append #$output "/bin/guile"))))) -- 2.36.1 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 18 05:45:57 2022 Received: (at 56051) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2022 09:45:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47544 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2V1g-0004zL-OD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 05:45:56 -0400 Received: from albert.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.90]:45974) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2V1e-0004zC-DG for 56051@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 05:45:55 -0400 Received: from [172.20.10.9] ([188.188.45.163]) by albert.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id kZlr2700F3XETgk06ZlsAY; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 11:45:52 +0200 Message-ID: <98e47fb9762158d9198b54c0dfcf237a9f5a7482.camel@telenet.be> Subject: Re: [bug#56051] [PATCH] guix: self: Do not record reference to gcc-toolchain. From: Maxime Devos To: Julien Lepiller , 56051@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 11:45:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20220618065810.30767-1-julien@lepiller.eu> References: <20220618064632.29319-1-julien@lepiller.eu> <20220618065810.30767-1-julien@lepiller.eu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-8nVu+IDM1CDUthiLsndN" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22; t=1655545552; bh=ntWxwiiJRV4uiebI5MQZznnQRg7KuQwA5ltcgzRNLhM=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=btWP2ly50PvxKUC6WLLkiBtFRD7z/llLo3SGpCshweCRmmHCG/zB510U3c/SKl7ar 3tEv75/zQxzx201+ahG/wVslJTo0SV0wMYkn0Wyh8OhKhVQinthyIJHLaKTHX5zXBK 6AxB0cUP/cUXq+C+R8949F1PKT5JZt0mOIhydn17bSJz+ZYGMHKX2rVi6RaZr33BSu vUDYMpx2HpL8OZ24+WeDU91Z3QDEcRo8uqeMHanEhwFs7hHqihav3YbiVgdRu5un11 gXyraxh7WvF1QZe0weo1M8PdIesFTTiE0UAw2mmNbYUoNo9TRtS699z+dWDD2F7Rbx ZooU75D+EYAmA== X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56051 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-8nVu+IDM1CDUthiLsndN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Julien Lepiller schreef op za 18-06-2022 om 08:58 [+0200]: > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (setenv "LIB= RARY_PATH" #$(file-append gcc "/lib")) I'm wondering if is this line that is incorrect, given that the 'gcc:out' store item does not have a /lib subdirectory. Would removing this line be sufficient? Greetings, Maxime. --=-8nVu+IDM1CDUthiLsndN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYq2exxccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7gKZAQDGXMdLh+aU5rQC7DesE2NQXIUw mYpqktEP/NIV/plg/AD+Mdh6hdaNwZUZfYLHRj5cYNYgck7lY2I0DVZqiSPscQ0= =Nwth -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-8nVu+IDM1CDUthiLsndN-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 18 12:52:34 2022 Received: (at 56051) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2022 16:52:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49956 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2bgX-0005sV-TY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 12:52:34 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:40838) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2bgS-0005rw-8R for 56051@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 12:52:32 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id ad3c78ae; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 16:52:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date:from :to:subject:in-reply-to:references:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=dkim; bh=8j+zdulpecar AvS/NevlaBsQ2NIullGpYh70GGWXkCA=; b=TqY12iIGH1loXPyorqVMHYGDY4yP MPvDn1HFf60YhG++VdlBxSZ/RxRvmKOGlWwl3ZMJ5qewCKwYAReXxfmuEjPiT13R qA9yatcZH+wHiAjwkT1AV+TmyItQKYyg57DfbM3vIeHJicM4nyebpD/x30bIrOe+ PLTlZ/36LZlow9P2JzGr/voa9gmRg+Jb6VGhARW6sHsv7d3yRr1TXMaYIf1Wp2HY +QtEtsWqOyDSJBMvY8qg9HFKGZNMR6QPpuGY0LLc1waOKz2fnQpIJbB5r4gnGyyr mYq0yK2F2pNmuSWur/bym6ROeH2iycr0+xMdkuJL2h/jnasUI9uXD+SSKw== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 7809012b (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 18 Jun 2022 16:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 14:13:03 +0200 From: Julien Lepiller To: Maxime Devos , 56051@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: =?US-ASCII?Q?Re=3A_=5Bbug=2356051=5D_=5BPATCH=5D_guix=3A_self=3A_Do?= =?US-ASCII?Q?_not_record_reference_to_gcc-toolchain=2E?= User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <98e47fb9762158d9198b54c0dfcf237a9f5a7482.camel@telenet.be> References: <20220618064632.29319-1-julien@lepiller.eu> <20220618065810.30767-1-julien@lepiller.eu> <98e47fb9762158d9198b54c0dfcf237a9f5a7482.camel@telenet.be> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On June 18, 2022 11:45:43 AM GMT+02:00, Maxime Devos wrote: >Julien Lepiller schreef op za 18-06-2022 om 08:58 [+0200]: >>            (setenv "LIBRARY_PATH" #$(file- [...] Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.1 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56051 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) On June 18, 2022 11:45:43 AM GMT+02:00, Maxime Devos wrote: >Julien Lepiller schreef op za 18-06-2022 om 08:58 [+0200]: >> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (setenv "L= IBRARY_PATH" #$(file-append gcc "/lib")) > >I'm wondering if is this line that is incorrect, given that the >'gcc:out' store item does not have a /lib subdirectory=2E Would removing >this line be sufficient? > >Greetings, >Maxime=2E Removing this line I get a message that gcc can't find crt*=2Eo=2E Remembe= r that this gcc is actually gcc-toolchain=2E Another possibility is to explicitely use gcc, binutils, glibc and ld-wrap= per=2E Thought this would be better? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 18 13:23:41 2022 Received: (at 56051) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2022 17:23:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49986 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2cAf-0006cy-GT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 13:23:41 -0400 Received: from baptiste.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.51]:51520) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2cAb-0006cn-4r for 56051@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 13:23:40 -0400 Received: from [172.20.10.5] ([188.188.12.151]) by baptiste.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id khPY2700M3FYNsk01hPZUw; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 19:23:35 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bug#56051] [PATCH] guix: self: Do not record reference to gcc-toolchain. From: Maxime Devos To: Julien Lepiller , 56051@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 19:23:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20220618064632.29319-1-julien@lepiller.eu> <20220618065810.30767-1-julien@lepiller.eu> <98e47fb9762158d9198b54c0dfcf237a9f5a7482.camel@telenet.be> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+ywYuSY9ciD2xxRsp5U/" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22; t=1655573015; bh=hGHuCPRIkXZoC4bnOyP7oqWCJo58BVJVq5mcCQbmGso=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=NT49wxZBmZ5xJLXCXODWjeEsKmXw7PmGnaL5CdPuPmQAAsCEUbLCnL0L9CCraBSUv Vyn8NkqjPSAHSziD6TZ2m1XaBkK/OPy702F5CEq66qS8qNM8HvKEzAP+I8JgC/4sg5 j1Rb9UK4qWMGfqkNhwoS4SNPcIooa8MC/nf1r5kwd2zDDMSMI3ibFahYKTVdopojKo D1nH/b9gGjMd7kjIDCM6jlkctmm20MxPoM+VEL7ZHv3kELmuxy74ABb1J41/46WHJe ZV1fb8IKsJrGjbpucDvGdKDQdwMUesb8UM0lCuIA/Q5YQq6KRoGq7l6xYiflInJ2k9 C1pkuxortc5nA== X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56051 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-+ywYuSY9ciD2xxRsp5U/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Julien Lepiller schreef op za 18-06-2022 om 14:13 [+0200]: > On June 18, 2022 11:45:43 AM GMT+02:00, Maxime Devos wrote: > > Julien Lepiller schreef op za 18-06-2022 om 08:58 [+0200]: > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (setenv = "LIBRARY_PATH" #$(file-append gcc "/lib")) > >=20 > > I'm wondering if is this line that is incorrect, given that the > > 'gcc:out' store item does not have a /lib subdirectory.=C2=A0 Would rem= oving > > this line be sufficient? > >=20 > > Greetings, > > Maxime. >=20 > Removing this line I get a message that gcc can't find crt*.o. Which crt are these? crt1.o, crti.o, crtn.o (from glibc) or crtbegin.o, crtend.o, crtprec64.o, ... (from gcc)? > Another possibility is to explicitely use gcc, binutils, glibc and > ld-wrapper. Thought this would be better? FWIW, the infrastructure in (guix scripts pack) does that, and the code in guix/self.scm has a comment: ;; XXX: Reuse from (guix scripts pack) instead? though maybe (guix scripts pack) has the same reference-keeping problem ... Greetings, Maxime. --=-+ywYuSY9ciD2xxRsp5U/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYq4KEBccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7tJXAP9GSt6dntDJhoz9RoBVA6kvqZSI uwCATGrgZpAJOS1mNAEAlyul7CnCcMq0DrW4Hj+H/gLiAUepNIBbtbkijVQBsww= =iqTa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+ywYuSY9ciD2xxRsp5U/-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 18 13:53:39 2022 Received: (at 56051) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2022 17:53:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49996 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2cdf-0007Mz-6d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 13:53:39 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:40850) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2cdc-0007Mo-Gf for 56051@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 13:53:38 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 59166665; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 17:53:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=dkim; bh=L+ffQInwABiM ohwy9fGmLMLJUgX7aioCXT07AuRSUB8=; b=JW5xLy2z30jJ14MM6AY10gy/wuXW xPUGxQUqoxw5moQGDtXojmIa5tGDQcVnBzr/o1Zw8bJxh5Neoc45CoBU1iYhsqcb WOgnclAEjtopTcNcFQwsV8x9EG2e4LTdvy5oeCGo8l5hMiFbzzYtew+DnRAoFrJn /3AV1AADnbHu+V+VABLJwPTUudjWsJOQWXC3QFeyXPp6e6+/Kjg+Nygw99RGDEIz bO0CqLzwiTx0P7kLsHb9EMUCBkwWij1kyH4WmB7Cb0J0mzMLrp/B49X4LML8WnTW lyad84j1R2gvUN6Otf0E7pe5CRoskaZVvi5vxcUOyHK35utndk+Qk30A+A== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 38ac06c8 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 18 Jun 2022 17:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 19:53:25 +0200 From: Julien Lepiller To: Maxime Devos Subject: Re: [bug#56051] [PATCH] guix: self: Do not record reference to gcc-toolchain. Message-ID: <20220618195319.3b9af9b9@sybil.lepiller.eu> In-Reply-To: References: <20220618064632.29319-1-julien@lepiller.eu> <20220618065810.30767-1-julien@lepiller.eu> <98e47fb9762158d9198b54c0dfcf237a9f5a7482.camel@telenet.be> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56051 Cc: 56051@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Le Sat, 18 Jun 2022 19:23:28 +0200, Maxime Devos a =C3=A9crit : > Julien Lepiller schreef op za 18-06-2022 om 14:13 [+0200]: > > On June 18, 2022 11:45:43 AM GMT+02:00, Maxime Devos > > wrote: =20 > > > Julien Lepiller schreef op za 18-06-2022 om 08:58 [+0200]: =20 > > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (seten= v "LIBRARY_PATH" #$(file-append gcc "/lib")) =20 > > >=20 > > > I'm wondering if is this line that is incorrect, given that the > > > 'gcc:out' store item does not have a /lib subdirectory.=C2=A0 Would > > > removing this line be sufficient? > > >=20 > > > Greetings, > > > Maxime. =20 > >=20 > > Removing this line I get a message that gcc can't find crt*.o. =20 >=20 > Which crt are these? crt1.o, crti.o, crtn.o (from glibc) or > crtbegin.o, crtend.o, crtprec64.o, ... (from gcc)? crt1.o and friends, from glibc. I tried using glibc explicitely and setting LIBRARY_PATH to (file-append glibc "/lib") and it worked. >=20 > > Another possibility is to explicitely use gcc, binutils, glibc and > > ld-wrapper. Thought this would be better? =20 >=20 > FWIW, the infrastructure in (guix scripts pack) does > that, and the code in guix/self.scm has a comment: >=20 > ;; XXX: Reuse from (guix scripts pack) instead? >=20 > though maybe (guix scripts pack) has the same reference-keeping > problem ... >=20 > Greetings, > Maxime. Mh, I'm not sure how to do that. Do you mind if I push this patch, and leave using to future work? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 18 15:08:29 2022 Received: (at 56051) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2022 19:08:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50030 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2do5-0000j0-0C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 15:08:29 -0400 Received: from xavier.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.52]:56006) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2do1-0000ip-Gg for 56051@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 15:08:28 -0400 Received: from [172.20.10.9] ([188.188.170.162]) by xavier.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id kj8N2700b3Waito01j8PKV; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 21:08:23 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bug#56051] [PATCH] guix: self: Do not record reference to gcc-toolchain. From: Maxime Devos To: Julien Lepiller Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 21:08:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20220618195319.3b9af9b9@sybil.lepiller.eu> References: <20220618064632.29319-1-julien@lepiller.eu> <20220618065810.30767-1-julien@lepiller.eu> <98e47fb9762158d9198b54c0dfcf237a9f5a7482.camel@telenet.be> <20220618195319.3b9af9b9@sybil.lepiller.eu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cJ4LBCKTwTba72tfJ+v2" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22; t=1655579303; bh=qylOAbK8FLqXagUUodN/+D+siCUNC17FpDJZ9cpmatM=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=QbAyJaJK+9Z3gzV/v7bJPsZi/4AZcdqfYZHfd/VvVX69SHMyUxFl6AcpCguVi+ipF i0cv9F+7M98rur5mYEfc4d7sO8j0AfzBkZocAXUCzmW47EBX2jtEg6GLy6wZ6Nvfxg uY4cjyp3xiuBVHKGBxOu3em5zq3cqQhTmBcs1CMbKDR3Ry+jqL4drG5BKCFMuygyPL 6Ud/gcSexG2IOeGUd3Ne02TMadph1306QuLlMiC5RzB/PERo5PQXmPvlFd5lY+ofap cd8cL+7LePxvoTa+HSBMTScBteX8iJ/jQ+Ygd+p2bcuhWPv2zKlKYg7h5oLnbqneJ7 4QY8JjoIJx5bg== X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56051 Cc: 56051@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-cJ4LBCKTwTba72tfJ+v2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Julien Lepiller schreef op za 18-06-2022 om 19:53 [+0200]: > crt1.o and friends, from glibc. I tried using glibc explicitely and > setting LIBRARY_PATH to (file-append glibc "/lib") and it worked. >=20 > >=20 > > > Another possibility is to explicitely use gcc, binutils, glibc and > > > ld-wrapper. Thought this would be better?=C2=A0=20 > >=20 > > FWIW, the infrastructure in (guix scripts pack) does > > that, and the code in guix/self.scm has a comment: > >=20 > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ;; XXX: Reuse from (guix scripts = pack) instead? > >=20 > > though maybe (guix scripts pack) has the same reference-keeping > > problem ... > >=20 > > Greetings, > > Maxime. >=20 > Mh, I'm not sure how to do that. Do you mind if I push this patch, and > leave using to future work? Sure, but keep in mind this adds 'glibc' to the closure (IIUC, packages like 'hello' use a different glibc, from %final-inputs in (gnu packages commencement)), so maybe best use (canonical-package glibc) instead? (*) (*) IIUC, (guix self) isn't used from any package module, so no cycle problems, can be imported directly. Greetings, Maxime --=-cJ4LBCKTwTba72tfJ+v2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYq4iohccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7vcXAP9aMpIX19gmbAK0AIOcYNEWyUSe LCoYyPmifM97taSEEgD+I6HVSqSXG3k31cUK+NxH8D+RAiALth1rHfPkTQ6v0As= =JAaF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cJ4LBCKTwTba72tfJ+v2-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 18 16:14:10 2022 Received: (at 56051-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2022 20:14:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50212 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2epd-0002U4-UO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 16:14:10 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:40904) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2epZ-0002Tr-6P for 56051-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 16:14:08 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 798219f9; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 20:14:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; s=dkim; bh=WcriMPpRvy8HsA/S+6TNCCM6Ojj2DcoKbfbtBc Bl9Wg=; b=Nz4gh+u7N4HNIW4H5hD9ELCo7/9mUntnePHpr0IW0SA2JTGBzffGRH Mgfo/p8l+aKxXO0OTiy3BxvbJs5dTqleMyoYZJQt8SF6RT+ylWsQU1J9Q6awufFw VIwKXmxNT2dVHlBWNYZu8/JcmJbTEXWDGfrYy2Y1AzFlk9I50pfTC/NSkttLUfHc VRzNzYz4elzcfnshaCyUMuBOVTYoLUFq7qHMdfI0837Ot7P3pCTGd9sqBzd2dhtx qvTIAMIpYw/9YORfTrYZ3nshesLZA9h0+cuRqVEuGpxpOz6ynvcz0k4i5be2HTAh fy9aL7l+X+vRCTRvLDE3A8ot6RdO4l3Q== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 6c6629f8 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 18 Jun 2022 20:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 22:14:01 +0200 From: Julien Lepiller To: Maxime Devos Subject: Re: [bug#56051] [PATCH] guix: self: Do not record reference to gcc-toolchain. Message-ID: <20220618221401.681618e0@sybil.lepiller.eu> In-Reply-To: References: <20220618064632.29319-1-julien@lepiller.eu> <20220618065810.30767-1-julien@lepiller.eu> <98e47fb9762158d9198b54c0dfcf237a9f5a7482.camel@telenet.be> <20220618195319.3b9af9b9@sybil.lepiller.eu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/iAOfXmfNBbX_xCZpB4aP9mB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56051-done Cc: 56051-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --Sig_/iAOfXmfNBbX_xCZpB4aP9mB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Sat, 18 Jun 2022 21:08:18 +0200, Maxime Devos a =C3=A9crit : > Julien Lepiller schreef op za 18-06-2022 om 19:53 [+0200]: > > crt1.o and friends, from glibc. I tried using glibc explicitely and > > setting LIBRARY_PATH to (file-append glibc "/lib") and it worked. > > =20 > > > =20 > > > > Another possibility is to explicitely use gcc, binutils, glibc > > > > and ld-wrapper. Thought this would be better?=C2=A0 =20 > > >=20 > > > FWIW, the infrastructure in (guix scripts pack) does > > > that, and the code in guix/self.scm has a comment: > > >=20 > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ;; XXX: Reuse from (guix script= s pack) instead? > > >=20 > > > though maybe (guix scripts pack) has the same reference-keeping > > > problem ... > > >=20 > > > Greetings, > > > Maxime. =20 > >=20 > > Mh, I'm not sure how to do that. Do you mind if I push this patch, > > and leave using to future work? =20 >=20 > Sure, but keep in mind this adds 'glibc' to the closure (IIUC, > packages like 'hello' use a different glibc, from %final-inputs in > (gnu packages commencement)), so maybe best use (canonical-package > glibc) instead? (*) >=20 > (*) IIUC, (guix self) isn't used from any package module, so no cycle > problems, can be imported directly. >=20 > Greetings, > Maxime I didn't notice a different glibc. I think gcc-toolchain already uses that glibc from commencement.scm. It's also defined in commencement.scm. Pushed to master as 319b8331b2357e12ec9edb9665513c32bef56622. --Sig_/iAOfXmfNBbX_xCZpB4aP9mB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: Signature digitale OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEHvsJCR8X0ozL+bE6U9RXstY27oIFAmKuMgkACgkQU9RXstY2 7oLP4A//Uh5rywbbfl21XUBJW+ib+mEjH7EjqD3QhdXIsygc94bMei0oovcC9fAY RD3UURcXZA+bePOBx2SP5rz0qJ0TZH1YAyxOcbUnMNbMTP30I0/n40Ue7FJCYJaN QH+VXX0LMG86kHgJHbYSOkRulofHhLr5Ikl/WGaLakClg2dQB5GCVG1K/N8x6B2d S7MuGhab6Eu0WBvW7IZVS+GqtcX6L2iroty1T5r6BI7r9DBB2XoXvHgY0xVYsaiQ Aj0dnS3JJqj4XNRRegVGamhVi/4YwbyFc8rgtlxfvVhy0AYQzgNPlOUK4eEaD2kQ sQNtTHjT0UcsER1lvRUh9RFL8Yl7ISPcyU2ok2lHbHSRoXwqlIG1MnSO8Z8BrESy NYiV9wKVjKyyTdIWt2MAeph7/TbPYGoro/VWZLbMuFnUDuKl17WXBe77U40y3R72 WWLwAwWHF+Yjjkp19/Rw5NkQXwtppzika7Tj/v9yyzAU1JrGMLCjlyVuldqdVjwv 86LMxO/qSPpzpHlTFqf5tzukJ5JVsj/+SPChkc3xlVk9ZAjtIKzNGA5sgmZ7NFNK 24vS4vZ9V9Qd1FOzJCUViJdtLkCUhr+J8k8kM/tCQlC9JC+pEQvGaEmAFpdUrDwZ jhOqONmr020JfMIP6vua0LveePMEj5M1ioX6A/AjjZAA9flPaLU= =Zjz8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/iAOfXmfNBbX_xCZpB4aP9mB-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 18 16:20:15 2022 Received: (at 56051-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2022 20:20:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50225 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2evW-0002dh-Tx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 16:20:15 -0400 Received: from andre.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.53]:55636) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2evU-0002dW-6H for 56051-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 16:20:13 -0400 Received: from [172.20.10.9] ([188.188.170.162]) by andre.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id kkLA2700G3Waito01kLAB5; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 22:20:11 +0200 Message-ID: <252905560b545477de0f22378f2ce94c4edb6aee.camel@telenet.be> Subject: Re: [bug#56051] [PATCH] guix: self: Do not record reference to gcc-toolchain. From: Maxime Devos To: Julien Lepiller Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 22:20:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20220618221401.681618e0@sybil.lepiller.eu> References: <20220618064632.29319-1-julien@lepiller.eu> <20220618065810.30767-1-julien@lepiller.eu> <98e47fb9762158d9198b54c0dfcf237a9f5a7482.camel@telenet.be> <20220618195319.3b9af9b9@sybil.lepiller.eu> <20220618221401.681618e0@sybil.lepiller.eu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-EFGck2Tmes+j6I5wkiRy" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22; t=1655583611; bh=S17JeCcRyZb5uHr0SzIQ8tT0RFTTOthKQoIlV4UvTDg=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Y8YAVEVtC7670WYEEO1keiMqvj8QZ6bZAOrGloKn1eMVIvJOvx11uvSYtZqKg2GXS jfbDhwSS+X2IoSYSW0vUhZtR4fEd+c+/FDElD7VqPeFNaZxjGP65nGtWJkOweJPMua cB+lie1eBM3tnItlKwgeTtci2+aUvlvjcQQy3u93bhH0eJWEny8GOuUUF0acV+IFIS epEwzYf5frZ69meAuckAFAPPaeOsMPNK6pG1r1ggEHCNIKz1t8SOLDmN8d3+BqRNov kmyKOVQOqkrCyzKvODee6NUgjbRlWw1OMsR8s6ACcZFns1ayF8D0t3/nTaDggqpnL/ R66Kf/0JPYoPQ== X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 56051-done Cc: 56051-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-EFGck2Tmes+j6I5wkiRy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Julien Lepiller schreef op za 18-06-2022 om 22:14 [+0200]: > I didn't notice a different glibc. I think gcc-toolchain already uses > that glibc from commencement.scm. It's also defined in > commencement.scm. OOps I misread your message and thought you were adding #$(file-append glibc "/lib") somewhere. --=-EFGck2Tmes+j6I5wkiRy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYq4zehccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7vpxAP9zKK5KQ0XzUJ0EF5tE0zXdDB4U PUX4zPQokVXoFyFNdAEAwEJ1wiijXqFnjlMlUEPGaRujXpMrSkiGS58vbRHJlQ4= =bhhj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-EFGck2Tmes+j6I5wkiRy-- From unknown Fri Aug 15 12:53:07 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator