From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:27:52 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#5595 <5595@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#5595 <5595@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: comment-indent-new-line in f90-mode Reply-To: bug#5595 <5595@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:27:52 +0000 retitle 5595 comment-indent-new-line in f90-mode reassign 5595 emacs submitter 5595 Angelo Graziosi severity 5595 minor tag 5595 help thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 18 05:57:51 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2010 10:57:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ni44t-0007EM-AK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:57:51 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ni44q-0007ED-G4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:57:49 -0500 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:38436) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ni44n-0003jc-Rs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:57:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ni44n-0006Ve-B1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:57:45 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on monty-python X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD,RECEIVED_FROM_WINDOWS_HOST,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.1.0 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:50534) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ni44n-0006Va-43 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:57:45 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ni44m-0003Nn-Lp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:57:44 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41572 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ni44k-0003Nf-Ue for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:57:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ni44k-0000Qa-Lp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:57:43 -0500 Received: from smtp-out01.alice.it ([85.33.2.12]:4028) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ni44k-0000QS-DV; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:57:42 -0500 Received: from fbcmmo06.fbc.local ([192.168.184.137]) by smtp-out01.alice.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:30:37 +0100 Received: from FBCMCL01B09.fbc.local ([192.168.171.26]) by fbcmmo06.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:30:34 +0100 Received: from [82.57.152.149] ([82.57.152.149]) by FBCMCL01B09.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:30:33 +0100 Message-ID: <4B7D16C2.3070908@alice.it> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:30:26 +0100 From: Angelo Graziosi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; it; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bug-gnu-emacs Subject: Commenting in F90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2010 10:30:33.0822 (UTC) FILETIME=[66F917E0:01CAB085] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1+ X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Glenn Morris X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) I do not know if this is a bug but it looks strange to me. Start Emacs with: $ emacs -Q & Then visit a new file: C-x C-f foo.f90 Type '!' (it is at line 1, column 0 in Emacs). Then continue to comment: C-M-j. The new '!' is at line 2, column 2 and not at line 2, column 0, i.e. below the previous '!', as one expects (at least me!). In other word the second '!' is indended. Why this? Ciao, Angelo. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 19 04:12:21 2010 Received: (at 5595) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2010 09:12:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiOuL-00073L-Dl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:12:21 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiOuK-00073D-4e; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:12:20 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiOuE-0006yX-VA; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:12:14 -0500 To: Angelo Graziosi Subject: Re: bug#5595: Commenting in F90 References: <4B7D16C2.3070908@alice.it> From: Glenn Morris X-Spook: crypto anarchy Commecen SDI Glock Skipjack MIT-LL Dick X-Ran: I^?-Q/d`)@lZ&y=/xbq\q6}ljdt1nEErAXEW!ob(j&-YA)S'P(s/Lr[\g&xo^#r(g:mOGI X-Hue: green X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:12:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B7D16C2.3070908@alice.it> (Angelo Graziosi's message of "Thu\, 18 Feb 2010 11\:30\:26 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5595 Cc: 5595@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) retitle 5595 comment-indent-new-line in f90-mode stop Angelo Graziosi wrote: > C-x C-f foo.f90 > > Type '!' (it is at line 1, column 0 in Emacs). > > Then continue to comment: C-M-j. The new '!' is at line 2, column 2 > and not at line 2, column 0, i.e. below the previous '!', as one > expects (at least me!). In other word the second '!' is indended. C-M-j runs comment-indent-new-line, a function which I do not understand. Maybe it's doing what it is supposed to do. The only way to customize the behaviour of this function is through standard comment variables. As far as I know these are all set correctly in f90-mode. The doc-string says Break line at point and indent, continuing comment if within one. This indents the body of the continued comment under the previous comment line. It's a little ambiguous from that as to whether it indents the first line or not. The Emacs manual is clearer, saying: Like followed by inserting and aligning a comment Ie, it does not indent the first line, only the second. Under these criteria, it appears to be working correctly. Personally I prefer C-j `f90-indent-new-line'. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 19 04:42:27 2010 Received: (at 5595) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2010 09:42:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiPNS-0007v0-Lq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:42:26 -0500 Received: from smtp-out01.alice.it ([85.33.2.12]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiPNQ-0007uv-E4 for 5595@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:42:25 -0500 Received: from FBCMMO04.fbc.local ([192.168.184.135]) by smtp-out01.alice.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:42:17 +0100 Received: from FBCMCL01B09.fbc.local ([192.168.171.26]) by FBCMMO04.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:42:16 +0100 Received: from [87.3.197.108] ([87.3.197.108]) by FBCMCL01B09.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:42:14 +0100 Message-ID: <4B7E5CED.5040509@alice.it> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:42:05 +0100 From: Angelo Graziosi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; it; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 5595@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#5595: Commenting in F90 References: <4B7D16C2.3070908@alice.it> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Feb 2010 09:42:14.0809 (UTC) FILETIME=[D1709090:01CAB147] X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5595 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) Il 19/02/2010 10.12, Glenn Morris ha scritto: > It's a little ambiguous from that as to whether it indents the first > line or not. The Emacs manual is clearer, saying: > > Like followed by inserting and aligning a comment > > Ie, it does not indent the first line, only the second. > Under these criteria, it appears to be working correctly. Uhm... It is not clear why this happens only with F90 mode. Repeating with 'foo.cpp' (C/C++ mode and '!' --> '//') or with 'foo.f' (Fortran mode, '!' --> 'C'), C-M-j sets the comment character correctly indended (to me!), under the previous and not shifted... In any case thanks for clarification. Ciao, Angelo. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 19 13:01:28 2010 Received: (at 5595) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2010 18:01:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiXAN-0005PJ-LP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:01:27 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiXAM-0005P8-90 for 5595@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:01:26 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiXAH-00012i-Md; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:01:21 -0500 To: Angelo Graziosi Subject: Re: bug#5595: Commenting in F90 References: <4B7D16C2.3070908@alice.it> <4B7E5CED.5040509@alice.it> From: Glenn Morris X-Spook: Ron Brown AIMSX Project Monarch 9705 Samford Road X-Ran: YJ/q}5z3WN0wh^UtrP (Angelo Graziosi's message of "Fri\, 19 Feb 2010 10\:42\:05 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5595 Cc: 5595@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) Angelo Graziosi wrote: > It is not clear why this happens only with F90 mode. Repeating with > foo.cpp' (C/C++ mode and '!' --> '//') or with 'foo.f' (Fortran mode, > !' --> 'C'), C-M-j sets the comment character correctly indended (to > me!), under the previous and not shifted... But 'C' comments in Fortran mode get zero indentation, so how can one tell if this functin is indenting the first line or not? Like I said, I don't really understand what this function is supposed to do, nor which variables modes should set to make it work correctly. Perhaps the maintainer of newcomment.el can help us out... From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 19 13:25:44 2010 Received: (at 5595) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2010 18:25:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiXXs-0005fv-0A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:25:44 -0500 Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiXXe-0005fd-LJ for 5595@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:25:42 -0500 Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o1JIPGQf012194; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:25:16 -0500 Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0A2C13A6E5; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:25:16 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: Angelo Graziosi Subject: Re: bug#5595: Commenting in F90 Message-ID: References: <4B7D16C2.3070908@alice.it> <4B7E5CED.5040509@alice.it> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:25:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B7E5CED.5040509@alice.it> (Angelo Graziosi's message of "Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:42:05 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3474=0 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5595 Cc: 5595@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) >> It's a little ambiguous from that as to whether it indents the first >> line or not. The Emacs manual is clearer, saying: >> Like followed by inserting and aligning a comment >> Ie, it does not indent the first line, only the second. >> Under these criteria, it appears to be working correctly. > Uhm... > It is not clear why this happens only with F90 mode. Repeating with > foo.cpp' (C/C++ mode and '!' --> '//') or with 'foo.f' (Fortran mode, > !' --> 'C'), C-M-j sets the comment character correctly indended (to me!), > under the previous and not shifted... comment-indent-new-line is written with a "traditional" free text style of languages and comments, so I'm not surprised it doesn't work 100% right under languages such as Fortran. It's a nasty function, but I've spent a fair bit of time in it (years ago), so I should be able to track down the problem. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 20 19:33:43 2010 Received: (at 5595) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2010 00:33:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NizlX-0003PU-1g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:33:43 -0500 Received: from smtp-out108.alice.it ([85.37.17.108]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NizlU-0003PJ-A0 for 5595@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:33:41 -0500 Received: from FBCMMO02.fbc.local ([192.168.68.196]) by smtp-out108.alice.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 21 Feb 2010 01:33:35 +0100 Received: from FBCMCL01B01.fbc.local ([192.168.69.82]) by FBCMMO02.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 21 Feb 2010 01:33:35 +0100 Received: from [87.3.34.28] ([87.3.34.28]) by FBCMCL01B01.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 21 Feb 2010 01:33:35 +0100 Message-ID: <4B807F59.5020508@alice.it> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 01:33:29 +0100 From: Angelo Graziosi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; it; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 5595@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#5595: Commenting in F90 References: <4B7D16C2.3070908@alice.it> <4B7E5CED.5040509@alice.it> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Feb 2010 00:33:35.0859 (UTC) FILETIME=[810AEC30:01CAB28D] X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5595 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) Il 19/02/2010 19.01, Glenn Morris ha scritto: > Angelo Graziosi wrote: > >> It is not clear why this happens only with F90 mode. Repeating with >> foo.cpp' (C/C++ mode and '!' --> '//') or with 'foo.f' (Fortran mode, >> !' --> 'C'), C-M-j sets the comment character correctly indended (to >> me!), under the previous and not shifted... > > But 'C' comments in Fortran mode get zero indentation, so how can one > tell if this functin is indenting the first line or not? > > Like I said, I don't really understand what this function is supposed > to do, nor which variables modes should set to make it work correctly. > > Perhaps the maintainer of newcomment.el can help us out... ...or, perhaps, the indentation should regard only the cursor, not the character! For example, editing bash script, the following happens (with the cursor, X, at the end of last line): ## [...] ## [...] ## foo text...X <== last line Typing C-M-j produces ## [...] ## [...] ## foo text... ## X with the cursor (X) under the 'f' of 'foo': the character '##' is vertically aligned. Ciao, Angelo. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 21 15:40:45 2012 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jun 2012 19:40:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52008 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ShnFE-0005Af-QT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:40:45 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:54145) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ShnFB-0005AY-Td for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:40:42 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShnBj-0002fd-AD for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:37:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:37:07 -0400 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 5595 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) tag 5595 help From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 23 13:05:56 2013 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2013 17:05:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58500 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UfYxd-0004DY-TQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 13:05:56 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:37080 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UfYxa-0004DN-Ik for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 13:05:51 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfYwl-0001Gp-Ja for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 13:04:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 13:04:59 -0400 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 14448 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -5.3 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) merge 5595 14448 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 25 23:11:45 2013 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2013 03:11:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35037 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UgRN1-0002Sn-T0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2013 23:11:45 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:34354 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UgRMy-0002SX-9I for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2013 23:11:41 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UgRLv-0004jU-KX for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2013 23:10:35 -0400 Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 23:10:35 -0400 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 14448 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -5.3 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.6 (------) severity 14448 minor From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 05 18:44:51 2022 Received: (at 5595) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2022 23:44:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35923 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nGUjb-0007pL-65 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2022 18:44:51 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50522) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nGUjY-0007p0-Hq; Sat, 05 Feb 2022 18:44:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=SIoetta+Y5ClO8VFblnNLcabQ5/1FUfb/2lV0n6OU88=; b=KxeoBoNPJ+ZtNFy+jNon/beBvk 4U5mHWLGQ0oiOtc9J+0mRYfeQSONse6fbernYHwO5U7Z0wAQevp/4vTxbM17viecllOz6qJCENUbA VC67t49tBrkl8uHK5oh+ITsG2hKumCvP+z1onBO0+Uc/wohVjOWPbsVNGwmrMGpaDGWc=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nGUjP-0005Bg-1w; Sun, 06 Feb 2022 00:44:42 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Angelo Graziosi Subject: Re: bug#14448: Wrong indentation in comment lines for F90 mode? References: <4B7D16C2.3070908@alice.it> X-Now-Playing: Brian Eno's _Another Green World_: "In Dark Trees" Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2022 00:44:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4B7D16C2.3070908@alice.it> (Angelo Graziosi's message of "Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:30:26 +0100") Message-ID: <87k0e898uy.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Angelo Graziosi writes: > Start Emacs with: > > $ emacs -Q & > > Then visit a new file: > > C-x C-f foo.f90 > > Type '!' (it is at line 1, column 0 in Emacs). > > Then continue to comment: C-M-j. The new '!' is at line 2, co [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 5595 Cc: Glenn Morris , 14448@debbugs.gnu.org, 5595@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Angelo Graziosi writes: > Start Emacs with: > > $ emacs -Q & > > Then visit a new file: > > C-x C-f foo.f90 > > Type '!' (it is at line 1, column 0 in Emacs). > > Then continue to comment: C-M-j. The new '!' is at line 2, column 2 > and not at line 2, column 0, i.e. below the previous '!', as one > expects (at least me!). In other word the second '!' is indended. (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved at the time.) I'm unable to reproduce this in more recent Emacs versions, so I'm guessing it's been fixed in the decade since this was reported, and I'm therefore closing this bug report. If this bug is still present, please respond to the debbugs address and we'll reopen. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 05 18:44:57 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2022 23:44:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35926 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nGUjh-0007po-H1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2022 18:44:57 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50536) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nGUjg-0007pI-4R for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2022 18:44:56 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=qeKHzPaN3R1BAdqRLqIS/rFdE8rUq/JkWnLKhVwQQp8=; b=iSJeqaqQJN6ChtWmzlOtM9tXhE wGoHT8iMhUaS7AdPH1rzPeuj5ynjxMAuJ5Me6MuPTJOh5mNYfiNdSJF3spcLkoJzNsEHttUoE/iyw agYjxKT2f30LSgpLcC8EEGa9os4905eW/5LG0dKWKprtl3tvvjc/HuKaTxy2sK+SUmsU=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nGUjY-0005Bq-3W for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2022 00:44:50 +0100 Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2022 00:44:45 +0100 Message-Id: <87ilts98uq.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #14448 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 14448 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 14448 quit From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:27:52 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2022 12:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator