GNU bug report logs - #5593
f90-mode and pc-selection-mode

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org (Emacs bug Tracking System)
To: Angelo Graziosi <angelo.graziosi <at> alice.it>
Subject: bug#5593 closed by Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> (Re: bug#5593:
 f90-mode and pc-selection-mode)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:37:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report
which was filed against the emacs,f90 package:

#5593: f90-mode and pc-selection-mode

It has been closed by Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>.

Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
better one in a separate message then please contact Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> by
replying to this email.


-- 
5593: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=5593
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: 5593-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#5593: f90-mode and pc-selection-mode
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:36:10 -0500

Angelo Graziosi wrote:

> M-x pc-selection-mode
[...]
> But if I type '*', the result is
>
> write(STDERR*,*)

Thanks; fixed by this change:

  * progmodes/f90.el (f90-electric-insert): Give it a
  delete-selection property.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Angelo Graziosi <angelo.graziosi <at> alice.it>
To: quiet <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: f90-mode and pc-selection-mode
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:43:06 +0100

Package: emacs,f90

[ resent from
  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-02/msg00400.html ]

In F90 mode, I still observe things which seem strange in my opinion.

To reproduce, start Emacs with

$ emacs -Q

and enable the Pc-Selection mode,

M-x pc-selection-mode

After this, if I have the code

write(STDERR,*)

double clicking on 'STDERR' and then typing 'a', '0'..., I obtain

write(a,*)
write(0,*)
...

which is expected.

But if I type '*', the result is

write(STDERR*,*)

and not 'write(*,*)', which, really, is what I expect (and want!).

Surely I am missing something here...

Ciao,
Angelo.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.