GNU bug report logs -
#55903
[PATCHSET] Adding aerc
Previous Next
Reported by: "(" <paren <at> disroot.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 09:07:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Raghav Gururajan <rg <at> raghavgururajan.name>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #275 received at 55903 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
( schreef op zo 12-06-2022 om 14:13 [+0100]:
> Seems a little risky just to avoid packaging one fork
It's not about _one_ fork, it's about forks in general.
And wasn't it backwards compatible? And no need the slightly risky
‘point the go-golang-org-x-crypto package at protonmail’ if it is
upstreamed instead.
> Anyway, I think it'd probably just drive people even further away
> from distribution package management towards the "modern" (read:
> insecure, bloated, and inherently flawed) stuff like Docker and
> Flatpak.
At some point, if people shoot theirselves in the foot by being misled
by other projects, that's not something Guix can help with avoiding I
think. (Unless someone wants to start an awareness campaign?)
Anyway, I don't follow -- your proposal is to include all the forks
where used by upstream, which leads to insecurity because:
* more packages -> more complexity -> more difficult to do changes
* more packages -> more packages that can be out-of-date
* more forks -> more forks that might be unmaintained and hence be at
risk of being known-insecure by attackers without an update
available
* more packages -> more packages that need to be updated -> less time
for structural improvement on security
* more packages -> more opportunity for malware to enter.
and also:
* more packages that +- do the same thing -> bloat
So from here, the proposal implies making packaging in Guix worse in
some aspects, such that people don't use other system's that are bad in
the same aspects ... I don't think it's a good idea to start a ‘race
to the bottom’ [0].
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_to_the_bottom
Greetings,
Maxime.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 175 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.