Subject: Re: bug#55863: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Avoid hanging chad of *Backtrace*

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 12:06:05 +0200

dick <[email-masked]> writes:

> No one wants to see "*Backtrace*<2>" and "*Backtrace*<3>".

I don't think anybody has proposed that?  Reusing the *Backtrace* buffer
is fine whether we erase the text in it or not on `q'.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no