GNU bug report logs - #55833
cross-base error: wrong type argument in position 1

Previous Next

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 55833 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz <at> elenq.tech>
To: "bug-guix <at> gnu.org" <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>,
 "othacehe <at> gnu.org" <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
Subject: cross-base error: wrong type argument in position 1
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 15:43:13 +0000

Hi all,

I'm experiencing the following error when I try to make something like (cross-libc "riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu") and it broke in every single setup I already have for months and was working properly. In fact, it works as expected when using a time-machine to the past.

```
$ guix shell -m manifest.scm
Backtrace:
In guix/scripts/environment.scm:
   953:13 19 (_)
In guix/store.scm:
  2168:25 18 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 7f651e026870> …)
In guix/scripts/environment.scm:
   955:14 17 (_ _)
In guix/profiles.scm:
    627:3 16 (_ _)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
   586:29 15 (map1 (#<<manifest-entry> name: "gcc" version: "4.6.…> …))
   586:29 14 (map1 (#<<manifest-entry> name: "binutils-cross-risc…> …))
   586:17 13 (map1 (#<<manifest-entry> name: "glibc-cross-riscv64…> …))
In guix/profiles.scm:
  1889:19 12 (_ _)
In guix/packages.scm:
  1269:17 11 (supported-package? #<package glibc-cross-riscv64-unkn…> …)
In guix/memoization.scm:
    101:0 10 (_ #<hash-table 7f650b8bae00 153/223> #<package glibc-…> …)
In guix/packages.scm:
  1239:12  9 (_)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
   460:18  8 (fold #<procedure 7f650ba4b540 at guix/packages.scm:12…> …)
In guix/packages.scm:
  1243:42  7 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"))
In guix/memoization.scm:
    101:0  6 (_ #<hash-table 7f650b8bae00 153/223> #<package linux-…> …)
In guix/packages.scm:
  1247:37  5 (_)
  1507:16  4 (package->bag _ _ _ #:graft? _)
  1612:43  3 (thunk)
In gnu/packages/cross-base.scm:
   352:33  2 (loop (#:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases # …) …) #)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  1685:16  1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
  1685:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)

ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
In procedure struct-vtable: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting struct): #f
```

I think the error was introduced in the commit b55310603f0df7d5ae02d47cb8d4be58bf1d41ca but I can't really explain what's happening.

You can replicate this using the manifest from: https://github.com/ekaitz-zarraga/gcc

It won't work if you have guix updated, but it will if you use the time-machine with the `channels.scm` file in the same repo.

You can also try with smaller packages (the repo is a full gcc4.6, use it under your own risk (: ), anything that uses `(cross-libc "riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu")` will trigger the error.

I would fix this myself but I don't really understand what's going on. If anyone guides me a little I'm open to fix it myself.

Thank you all!
Ekaitz

ElenQ Technology
Ethical Innovation

Message #8 received at 55833 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz <at> elenq.tech>, 55833 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, othacehe <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#55833: cross-base error: wrong type argument in position 1
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 20:33:58 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Ekaitz Zarraga schreef op di 07-06-2022 om 15:43 [+0000]:
> I think the error was introduced in the commit b55310603f0df7d5ae02d47cb8d4be58bf1d41ca but I can't really explain what's happening.

I guess it's due to the introduction of

  lookup-platform-by-target-or-system

Proposed solution:

  * rename platform-linux-architecture to
    '%platform-linux-architecture'
    and define a wrapper 'platform-linux-architecture' displaying
    a proper error message ‘unsupported target’ or such.

and

  * use "riscv64-linux-gnu" instead of "riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu"
    (as expected by (guix platforms riscv)).

Greetings,
Maxime.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #11 received at 55833 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>, Ekaitz Zarraga
 <ekaitz <at> elenq.tech>, 55833 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, othacehe <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#55833: cross-base error: wrong type argument in position 1
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 12:35:41 +0200

Hello Maxime and Ekaitz,
Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be> writes:

> Ekaitz Zarraga schreef op di 07-06-2022 om 15:43 [+0000]:
> Proposed solution:
>
>   * rename platform-linux-architecture to
>     '%platform-linux-architecture'
>     and define a wrapper 'platform-linux-architecture' displaying
>     a proper error message ‘unsupported target’ or such.
>
> and
>
>   * use "riscv64-linux-gnu" instead of "riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu"
>     (as expected by (guix platforms riscv)).

I don't think we should deviate from the usual behaviour of a procedure
returning #f it wasn't able to find the thing it was searching for.
Ideally, cross-libc should take a platform argument itself, so that we
can lookup the target earlier and throw an exception there instead.

WDYT?

Best,
-- 
Josselin Poiret

Message #14 received at 55833 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz <at> elenq.tech>, 
 55833 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, othacehe <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#55833: cross-base error: wrong type argument in position 1
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 15:06:10 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Josselin Poiret schreef op wo 08-06-2022 om 12:35 [+0200]:
> >    * rename platform-linux-architecture to
> >      '%platform-linux-architecture'
> >      and define a wrapper 'platform-linux-architecture' displaying
> >      a proper error message ‘unsupported target’ or such.
> > 
> > and
> > 
> >    * use "riscv64-linux-gnu" instead of "riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu"
> >      (as expected by (guix platforms riscv)).
> 
> I don't think we should deviate from the usual behaviour of a
> procedure
> returning #f it wasn't able to find the thing it was searching for.

The proposal was to modify platform-linux-architecture, which doesn't
search for anything and doesn't return #false.  It already throws an
exception:

> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
> In procedure struct-vtable: Wrong type argument in position 1
> (expecting struct): #f

The proposal is to make the error message clearer, by raising an
exception ourselves instead of leaving it to struct-vtable.

(My proposal might have been confusing due to the mention of
lookup-platform-by-target-or-system which doesn't seem relevant on
second sight?)

Greetings,
Maxime.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #17 received at 55833 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>, Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz <at> elenq.tech>, 
 55833 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, othacehe <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#55833: cross-base error: wrong type argument in position 1
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 15:12:00 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Josselin Poiret schreef op wo 08-06-2022 om 12:35 [+0200]:
> I don't think we should deviate from the usual behaviour of a procedure
> returning #f it wasn't able to find the thing it was searching for.
> Ideally, cross-libc should take a platform argument itself, so that we
> can lookup the target earlier and throw an exception there instead.

Wait my proposal cannot work as-is because linux-architecture=#false
for Hurd platforms ...

FWIW, I think the current usual behaviour is not ideal, and that these
kind of procedures should raise an exception instead, like
specification->package:

scheme@(guix-user)> (specification->package "foobar")
guix repl: fout: foobar: onbekend pakket ; <-- unknown package

Or search-input-file or search-input-directory.

Maybe it could raise a &non-linux-platform condition like
search-input-file raises &search-error condition?

Greetings,
Maxime.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #20 received at 55833 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz <at> elenq.tech>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
Cc: othacehe <at> gnu.org, 55833 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#55833: cross-base error: wrong type argument in position 1
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 16:29:36 +0000

Hi,

> * use "riscv64-linux-gnu" instead of "riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu"
> (as expected by (guix platforms riscv)).


There's an slight problem with that. I tried to do it and I can't
build my custom gcc without sending the full triplet (with -unknown)
and if I make the other parts of the system, like binutils without the
-unknown part, the gcc is unable to find `ld`.

I have to dig on this further but it looks like this has further
effects on the system.

Best,
Ekaitz

Message #23 received at 55833 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz <at> elenq.tech>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
Cc: othacehe <at> gnu.org, 55833 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#55833: cross-base error: wrong type argument in position 1
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 17:11:17 +0000

Forget it, there was some code missing to match the platform correctly in my
custom GCC. Added it and now it's working without the `unknown` part.

Cheers

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.