GNU bug report logs - #55751
[PATCH 0/8] Towards reproducible openjdk

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: dannym <at> scratchpost.org

Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 12:59:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> reproducible-builds.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #41 received at 55751 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: dannym <at> scratchpost.org, 55751 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#55751] [PATCH 0/8] Towards reproducible openjdk
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2022 15:20:31 +0200
dannym <at> scratchpost.org schreef op wo 01-06-2022 om 14:57 [+0200]:
> From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
> 
> This patchseries improves the reproducibility of openjdk.
> 
> After it:
> * openjdk9 is reproducible.
> * openjdk10 has only a few non-reproducible parts.
> * openjdk11 has a number of non-reproducible parts.
> * openjdk12's "doc" output is still not reproducible ("Generated by javadoc" comment with timestamp in it)
> * openjdk13 still has non-reproducible parts (jmod, modules, classes.jsa, src.zip)
> * openjdk14 still has very few non-reproducible parts (jmod, modules, classes.jsa)
> * openjdk15 still has a number of non-reproducible parts (diz files only).
> * openjdk16 still has one non-reproducible part (classes*.jsa)

Now we are rebuilding everything Java anyway, could this be followed by
a patch removing the input labels and removing trailing #t?

Greetings,
Maxime.





This bug report was last modified 270 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.