From unknown Tue Jun 24 19:12:46 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#55706: 29.0.50; files test fails about 20% of the time Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 May 2022 14:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 55706 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 55706@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Michael Albinus X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16538354885631 (code B ref -1); Sun, 29 May 2022 14:45:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2022 14:44:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41596 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nvK9w-0001Sk-0l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2022 10:44:48 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:42020) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nvK9s-0001Sb-HM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2022 10:44:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52654) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nvK9s-0006Xy-AJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2022 10:44:44 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:52192) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nvK9q-0003Si-Mk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2022 10:44:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=znIu7AhemfHs6wZGteT2UXNNecGg1qXrkqOSx3eCXCI=; b=ni917i7jDg0jNu3QOPylqW9wkR e4xqT5MwHxJA03nMi6J7FeeMVmyMjj/r85xwai4tyopHlnXD5/Lpgpmb3hf3uML8fQpOqcc3pXzSV 5+FnRwMBjXilikdL/tbZZ+v67X5+Uzz0AOlQ2d9GBsap5cjuEDq/RU6jt7iUOZ2f7sK0=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nvK9k-00051g-O2; Sun, 29 May 2022 16:44:38 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen X-Now-Playing: The Cure's _The Top_: "Wailing wall" Date: Sun, 29 May 2022 16:44:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87ee0cz9d9.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: I can't reproduce this reliably, but in about 20% of the times I run "make check", this test fails: Test files-tests-file-name-non-special-file-in-directory-p condition: (ert-test-failed ((should (file-in-directory-p nospecial nospecial-tempdir)) :form (file-in-directory-p "/:/tmp/files-testsuqfdq1. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) I can't reproduce this reliably, but in about 20% of the times I run "make check", this test fails: Test files-tests-file-name-non-special-file-in-directory-p condition: (ert-test-failed ((should (file-in-directory-p nospecial nospecial-tempdir)) :form (file-in-directory-p "/:/tmp/files-testsuqfdq1.special" "/:/tmp/") :value nil)) FAILED 52/112 files-tests-file-name-non-special-file-in-directory-p (0.001158 sec) at lisp/files-tests.el:692 Michael wrote the test, so I've added him to the CCs. In GNU Emacs 29.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.33, cairo version 1.16.0) of 2022-05-17 built on xo Repository revision: 803041e01474f2a522170c9f388068e8460be2ae Repository branch: master Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12101003 System Description: Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Tue Jun 24 19:12:46 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#55706: 29.0.50; files test fails about 20% of the time Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 16:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55706 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 55706@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 55706-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55706.16539293834521 (code B ref 55706); Mon, 30 May 2022 16:50:02 +0000 Received: (at 55706) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2022 16:49:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45976 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nviaM-0001Aq-Vf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 12:49:43 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:39251) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nviaK-0001Aa-TS for 55706@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 12:49:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1653929374; bh=jmHIzSPTRVle4f0u7D3oJ9caUQl9cOu5qyHmVJHua4A=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=gjA816IkNeR3lUb81XD2bdjZ4cBIwb9TvfJ2V05lUpLgefAI+U82tKLDJut/Pi3zS GnEZfgg9UdVqmP7ClkqTOmknnYUJSUhVl2S0dlJMQbc5Rsrx5+C15nAs4dpRCUYDcH 3pTMqKMNMsVoWa2uJuMdBQWdhsPEqCrE1O/OCfbA= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([213.220.159.102]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N5VHG-1nl1OO2t4s-016z6O; Mon, 30 May 2022 18:49:34 +0200 From: Michael Albinus References: <87ee0cz9d9.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 18:49:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87ee0cz9d9.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 29 May 2022 16:44:34 +0200") Message-ID: <878rqjvuci.fsf@gmx.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:P6+r4urXLyb+GVz7nyBmlCFhyoGP1eOVson4EioD8K62PqZhpbQ 1xmEBFy6rlrPX6yH+qabfj8cuet8kVWC9klMGgzzsPaUsv5svk1VaCr2pTiAY6a9z/VXh5T Z68XwhrCZUJnAoAQ9nIu62LJFd2F2Wy4FWBwS3FkXzwDXQBwnfZ/4z7sbAHen7XCWUN8Bf5 0cXT+uekbaj63ebDc7rxw== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:d/p9wZFX5U0=:GiJv7V3irr2+YvSIoMYumY FTFQ8pPE7BwxVGq7SPewDRMdDG/oWcQb35uaXvxKIn8YGOX8+zKedRwGBpuxG4kYKBq1a6Pib sdkUPjStBsl2U+S9GX/HOfxdNfkt10974NSiUiaAPHzA0YNmoo9a+taeVjHXxMRZeZkzF0O8V tNRRZVhjQA/bOXuEyftgwXE6TJUvDU/T89GO2XJbqeuytLzdmmlaSkPF9eyEAJk9wNgUNwGGA Fn/0tty/YV6HyF2FcHivkzZafaGSzue0hSX1fwYG2phy13Y5kAreew7L6UQaJrmr9UkrBimcL zDQ7zSt/EuQuJ4oesbnVBU8rAMNL+VrFyi/MEBK7KUomHeDCJnczANSKA49vT4+UJbdzKmkiZ 3ZZDY8qcGrMeKkpLm6EcWSkNfPhLun6kfot17fM0H67ihjCIctGCrpXfL0EU9MMYOHyks4spM n0KSO4SKsC0YD/N2TMIoq4Pompe9MvfZJ3tG6xExLYYIdN/Q2CMb3Wz3KhfWOB9PiGlDtDCbJ UPt06uy4k6grl5ozHOAQ8daPv1nvba2QT7PtJwi6yQJIFV3FFU9YenaZNXs9smxoBZXHfJqN6 DMkOvyTAi/+5Fh0CpOxKxFCDn6smpHATLz9uJXhk/md5OJjpknC7k3mfUvLQJk/kYiw7vMKwt JGBfm3dMtrMr+hPD8BK1g7VMJsG8SB/nC0liuKmq1wUd7UgFBSGEgnV2fEzlVtVt7K8IrTSIq G15TF7cLWerQuvwpuRQfD6xkSmwQRodfjbtibYuoYhknjzCJwfQjfRYltZPddrEVcfyFofQiK a/p9xPbuqg6MYyOWItVDJC0MvLBnGMlpCoR7XtT+r9V2w3K3uD9bAc4OsKiLzg+iPX+oxNC7E O6ZW68g67vw1g/ZIrD5mhVGclxtWStwytA6emWJXk8kSgaANlctYL9rIvtzrUprzntrL+C0Dt +EEtV9NKEqaVqv1rLPeP4bHFNxgYWs3t0X+1ApSAXCL8lszilMZWY12ZDKZ/wYNtuUSgtN87D c7CqRTFkx8pIaeQLeVpxEdSXjV2TukRTVXw0Y6RQqOYDmaFZRN48cdk+2tNSf3ZWq7512PkG2 LRPBKIIRYasRWuarPVBQqUADI/fkdKYjt2IBZnBwUQntXyMtnMAFoxyNg== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: Hi, > I can't reproduce this reliably, but in about 20% of the times I run > "make check", this test fails: > > Test files-tests-file-name-non-special-file-in-directory-p condition: > (ert-test-failed > ((should > (file-in-directory-p nospecial nospecial-tempdir)) > :form > (file-in-directory-p "/:/tmp/files-testsuqfdq1.special" "/:/tmp/") > :value nil)) > FAILED 52/112 files-tests-file-name-non-special-file-in-directory-p (0.001158 sec) at lisp/files-tests.el:692 > > Michael wrote the test, so I've added him to the CCs. Strange. I have applied 100 times "make -C test files-tests". It always returns --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Ran 112 tests, 111 results as expected, 1 unexpected (2022-05-30 18:34:19+0200, 1.005432 sec) 1 unexpected results: PASSED files-load-elc-gz-file --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- (This might also be worth to be investigated.) No error of files-tests-file-name-non-special-file-in-directory-p. Perhaps the parallel nature of the test runs make it happen? Does it also fail occasionally when you call "make -j1 ..."? Furthermore, (file-in-directory-p "/:/tmp/files-testsuqfdq1.special" "/:/tmp/") should always return non-nil, unless the directory /tmp does not exist, or is not accessible. Could this happen in your environment, temporarily? Best regards, Michael. From unknown Tue Jun 24 19:12:46 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#55706: 29.0.50; files test fails about 20% of the time Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 16:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55706 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Michael Albinus Cc: 55706@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 55706-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55706.16539295934987 (code B ref 55706); Mon, 30 May 2022 16:54:02 +0000 Received: (at 55706) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2022 16:53:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45980 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nvidc-0001I8-Eu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 12:53:13 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:47688) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nvidX-0001HS-DC for 55706@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 12:53:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=f5nYjwMKRwIESYtz3cOXkWL5XOAn0CI/vMoboXx78cY=; b=O5MvP/POJK/oYL2EavGkK++5Ru 03qm4EB11qZZVXjhn81x0RexMN9+Deri0Tu1yni6QSIP7B4ZFwMDuK5cVNB5NrgZHecv5XnhRZE2e CiqPFR0a2fK1ZUK8SCRCX7TbhEOlkOLPq+upp3tNGu7akGUO3ndHOQBLLZ1RUYqkjR7A=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nvidO-0007Tj-JK; Mon, 30 May 2022 18:52:52 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87ee0cz9d9.fsf@gnus.org> <878rqjvuci.fsf@gmx.de> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAFVBMVEUXFRQrKSdCQD1h XlyCfn2moZ////9G+a7JAAAAAWJLR0QGYWa4fQAAAAd0SU1FB+YFHhAzCeV+gwcAAAGzSURBVDjL tZNNcuQgDIVNnwDoCxhI9mmE91MB9j0TdP+r5Am3wZ3pbVS2y8Vn/T3JizJiy25K4WGMlvdLpEik l//s4tfj1ejXwIb4whF2pUIviU2Vs3sBFFXmfPt5jMw2MXNbf3zu3WKuQv49x3chOmMlGJ9rU4Eo 4u6g8cyjEol54t0+ZqVyHn33gN0PEFIpHTzIfZTUAblAqYM/B7CpZAE+pPrkYSgVyrSah8vHAIEq JFyV3bOMqgA2knGp3WWOyAuIWmm4AIzeIcZGJUIZFTbmr9k5QM5RW1zbrLZnTxmhLPInbudpeABv bI3L28lBeicBobb1egLGeB8gFWrjrOp9ZrAOjABR6m0bwDpvjMWcUhM93kffXkzOiUWPvJ6BDKo0 9MB1tmcBZOKVJdQXz6KE7EPq0xhKKSlVsld8DpuhED47SF+41ROwkrd8opFc28lD9fNSbiC18BT9 ghC1lZLx5xTZhQN4LEIFyX3iqOzv0JUaI1SGEtqnMSbrU5QUhUxPWI4VsZQ+sYct79sPvfRIka9Z VmTfYpeP3NjKGzk3dcClux4JzT39Xg9gvV5+174BvvF8JvVcqwwAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRl ADIwMjItMDUtMzBUMTY6NTE6MDkrMDA6MDB5O8VIAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIyLTA1 LTMwVDE2OjUxOjA5KzAwOjAwCGZ99AAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Nils Petter =?UTF-8?Q?Molv=C3=A6r's?= _Khmer_: "Song Of Sand II" Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 18:52:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <878rqjvuci.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Mon, 30 May 2022 18:49:33 +0200") Message-ID: <877d63vu72.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Michael Albinus writes: > Perhaps the parallel nature of the test runs make it happen? Does it > also fail occasionally when you call "make -j1 ..."? I have never seen it happen with a -j1, but I don't usually do that. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Michael Albinus writes: > Perhaps the parallel nature of the test runs make it happen? Does it > also fail occasionally when you call "make -j1 ..."? I have never seen it happen with a -j1, but I don't usually do that. > Furthermore, (file-in-directory-p "/:/tmp/files-testsuqfdq1.special" "/:/tmp/") > should always return non-nil, unless the directory /tmp does not exist, > or is not accessible. Could this happen in your environment, temporarily? No, it's just a standard Debian/bookworm machine with a normal /tmp. I'll set it up to look over a -j1 to see whether it even fails when doing that and report back. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Tue Jun 24 19:12:46 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#55706: 29.0.50; files test fails about 20% of the time Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 18:30:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55706 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Michael Albinus Cc: 55706@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 55706-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55706.165393534426706 (code B ref 55706); Mon, 30 May 2022 18:30:03 +0000 Received: (at 55706) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2022 18:29:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46068 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nvk8W-0006wf-G0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 14:29:04 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:48480) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nvk8R-0006vz-NE for 55706@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 14:29:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Zp5MK3ttw4elW41PEExVOy6mRktBOFmgsg9oyluzAgI=; b=DX46hH46dnP3gMXnsXe5rMCliK AH9eyys59UHMK6cVlC4XpUltK9oxCRz8S7AJY0F62pChLojOouTRmdaNgM/ntH2DbP6Q1vK4/oSxD anRHJqAvsf+JDBlfCGhf7KdQ6JOs5R7HzcHYVJkomXZnf8yrAuXNhwATMnBthtYUaL74=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nvk8I-0000C6-04; Mon, 30 May 2022 20:28:53 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87ee0cz9d9.fsf@gnus.org> <878rqjvuci.fsf@gmx.de> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAFVBMVEVWa4hSVmOdenG9 tKfdy67u1az////hoQsMAAAAAWJLR0QGYWa4fQAAAAd0SU1FB+YFHhIGB6NzuNgAAAGqSURBVDjL lZNhcqMwDIVF6QEQuQC2e4BgOxdYyRfY2ve/Sp9M0joN+2NfhpmgD0lPwhAtRP16kQWnkzgvIOxw 9X9DAs8qkZeJTSO4lNZa5ENjTgef/KPpyEvZQI0hxAT5rg2gqoGmQRDOdmWVpIlUQUrV/vxdO69s QAt+Er7jeTd/mtWCZUyRDpKgY9CaHik55dgBrLiMJG9RzYISmrYDMPtLSrOBQ6WSlQRguL2ijJpr STGT4CZyyNLLazmAu3SwGzh653stNVe6ryFHAPppUq15jh7ATFF4EIDoczfrEdzfMenDFYDajH0M 8hoNtUqrPYlCtIQ+6irYaQFggJjjNjFGTLfqW5cBPCd+wakw0Oo3uGBrmJ0mfsNLam0Eim3ZWmZ5 f4DWQTflmGa5PWVIPwNuojmVIWPFJNGOBjG9AI8em4H2Apwn8tf8CpCQrvNtBNzBRm8bzeUMbLwO layUHJ6wnI8z4KdfILkAS+Zr8bcRlD8YYnUGxt54tU0c9gdA4Qng5hMLXJMbF3KAViWuWMro1kp1 4cM9B639HVuM4FkA+k+g/w+0nIAvgMvuKiB7I0QAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjItMDUt MzBUMTg6MDY6MDcrMDA6MDBAaQWeAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIyLTA1LTMwVDE4OjA2 OjA3KzAwOjAwMTS9IgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Exec's _Advertise Here_: "Sen Yen for 30 Minutes of Violin" Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 20:28:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <878rqjvuci.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Mon, 30 May 2022 18:49:33 +0200") Message-ID: <877d62an8e.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: I've now run a number of for i in `seq 1 40`; do make -j64 check; done > /tmp/j64.out 2>/tmp/j64.err variations, and it varies how much it fails. With -j4 and lower, it never fails. With j8 to j16 it fails about 1 in 10 times, and with -j32 it fails 40% of the time. (Take numbers with a grain of salt [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) I've now run a number of for i in `seq 1 40`; do make -j64 check; done > /tmp/j64.out 2>/tmp/j64.err variations, and it varies how much it fails. With -j4 and lower, it never fails. With j8 to j16 it fails about 1 in 10 times, and with -j32 it fails 40% of the time. (Take numbers with a grain of salt.) So there seems to be something racing with this test -- but only this test. Pretty bizarre. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Tue Jun 24 19:12:46 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#55706: 29.0.50; files test fails about 20% of the time Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 18:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55706 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 55706@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 55706-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55706.165393624828893 (code B ref 55706); Mon, 30 May 2022 18:45:01 +0000 Received: (at 55706) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2022 18:44:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46081 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nvkN6-0007Vx-1L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 14:44:08 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:53765) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nvkN2-0007VF-1b for 55706@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 14:44:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1653936238; bh=mX+ugkBNeoGc8hv8deesa4CV5VKRERjVKM6naHEng0Y=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=hflh3US5tYUulLPbzppSwOV1V04teYByKA823h1AtVBNiaV/Gd4bW+4C5Y8vzKJ+x gRSKajtXd77rWa88KgfQtwWbCYS4BEYe+piFjQ41QckHsTcvFQZAJK5kstKikVJguy BRzvoMU5mZ2XvXDfb+Gv+slo+15EF0j4cK3kO7ns= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([213.220.159.102]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MEm6F-1o2eNq3rZ5-00GHZR; Mon, 30 May 2022 20:43:58 +0200 From: Michael Albinus References: <87ee0cz9d9.fsf@gnus.org> <878rqjvuci.fsf@gmx.de> <877d62an8e.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 20:43:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <877d62an8e.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 30 May 2022 20:28:49 +0200") Message-ID: <874k16x3mb.fsf@gmx.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:drPrtgMHMTWuBDFYj0RQ44ZSswhN1llTNiDv2aEZtr1obZbkDln FtHrhmg4Gr/GhjqxtDlUFUogpx+GBNOeM3FTaCS8uSBuzyUgbM2Vncfu4EHBDNr7GV9aFZb mGTeikUEwzTL3bfaW9L+k7JzbPthBUNXrI5znxWjI3tC3pmHvZgPGryMJeNcXXwpYyNpCMT 9NZLyJ048m1DH9rIg1GIA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:79DJew5sRUI=:lHr9dM+FIiDiQaeIP7ePgr r24/yrhpn5XjUKdlE9lAu/9Dx7YIZ7CbjGOA8Tf4/f1tVe16EeARAd6T2xxrnpgbDgY+yIF1U ss31OiOg+thY1U/cnFMKsH6avHDjTwMCJ6CF6bs6ZwsbC2ek3Cp2j1OBOVERPyptQ3U39Rtw7 1BHSsD3qt3dIqDa82xaEkwmAC3wF5G1wDG41noM5nCGSVAviUAJwHaT2LwkZagiunh/dW80tm +q6kt2lHswWIU2vSAeLXthRFy9MsHi9eEp2SkJTbzfHW/K679BR1b30VxaizS0Utt/apWe6J4 3rRi90FCH/xPElnTqeH9IFVDEDT39rbcxQsosZ6I8jvqAo543eX6c9fwUp10AAzuB3xB6efD3 Vly2Mhx7ut02aKlDeIVpcMM+ojBPoJYrpJ6nMefZeB6PgtoHBObWrbumhDxW6E04SbhIG6Rkz avrMG5hSk3AEe1wuAAtMkTBV5hq2CGyU6IBKr8jMAaq7eZ0jOVdrM75MvJPapEYhqCa14cZHb f1mIoKgX10Zafw3PO//rCrvZiZ2lBxF6nDX8h76Aik7Rfmoom+aaCO4TzfFJS7U4W1fpJMyBR wPl4NsMljwcwUnl5ZpEm0bYKUXr4taQ29iaf3RqoEEEb1xQYRW+qVfuYRQufji5W2EL+9OXvz pbfNNdVkyLzyC3egpD68pwQH1gZVNJuRQylDgAvU/5UYzlHP3AHsevkF5E8v5vMon4xjqZY97 O+8QajlxMsjjOIONJwqbxp2j9uHQzcYWFWbMRpfn8v8aB5l9hKGbBfE32+EBTzAjoqZkDRYVX NQdg1R7dqkOYAf2y1swCig9Vxmu1UYI0H93wZlcO7YE7CgFSYE2l2//FaHIEorjxWvT93y5q9 aWIo0RiSvbzWdWgt1gs77nOsChzro+lFOgq3w0bxkMVMuaBODFXNcWTjSjWr5x6acDYTnIj2W dad+nBeyrkN0xc7mONmeDluMoprvBx7Foox+d8irm0y8Px1QThrTtdfAsH+ZJZe95BqPDsj50 0PjKJ4LR+mBGdwT78AkXyLYrtj/Dt1rk6wOFlDJpnSyh3VDRHsvgqhSqIqk9ZTAiIx5dmbCuE 6CDYo+K1uXl4nqTQ/bTjQXflulu1jDumlGlOgSM9XceMylMgf45G6h86A== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: Hi, > I've now run a number of > > for i in `seq 1 40`; do make -j64 check; done > /tmp/j64.out 2>/tmp/j64.err > > variations, and it varies how much it fails. With -j4 and lower, it > never fails. With j8 to j16 it fails about 1 in 10 times, and with -j32 > it fails 40% of the time. (Take numbers with a grain of salt.) > > So there seems to be something racing with this test -- but only this > test. Pretty bizarre. Yep, bizarre. I have no idea what's up. Let's sleep about it ... Best regards, Michael. From unknown Tue Jun 24 19:12:46 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#55706: 29.0.50; files test fails about 20% of the time Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 09:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55706 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 55706@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 55706-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55706.165399107430786 (code B ref 55706); Tue, 31 May 2022 09:58:01 +0000 Received: (at 55706) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 May 2022 09:57:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46680 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nvydO-00080T-CH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2022 05:57:54 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:41333) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nvydG-000802-Bu for 55706@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2022 05:57:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1653991060; bh=vbCmOtIEZ3dQIAwaZaiGv6P/GXw1nLTAscKZDWxXKAk=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=eEfrbdppyE/HNhCGBKuBh5J6pGHAukPERLiMo3dfyZvJHmy2UY4lGST0F7zpQJ0fS Nn6y1HgUw1ZnpUm2YQEWCOL0cOnF9PWOI3cEmWt5mOH7Svr/Wjs2Tm1HX99cRfV1fX 1K/uIwiiMnudRJtBS5Fv/AijDLqlYw9BSI4HhoT0= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([213.220.159.102]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mel3n-1nLGMr0Sfd-00anvb; Tue, 31 May 2022 11:57:40 +0200 From: Michael Albinus References: <87ee0cz9d9.fsf@gnus.org> <878rqjvuci.fsf@gmx.de> <877d62an8e.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 11:57:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <877d62an8e.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 30 May 2022 20:28:49 +0200") Message-ID: <87zgiyuir1.fsf@gmx.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:uAkOQ9MYKhcX56zrE1LTNTlYqdagyNXBmKrNYCLMjf+t4jz/pAf aQXtlUflyt7dPOS2+YvNbfpuZJUgDdwH/ZxRpaxrWXQtJFIBAXQCbtCxLvcEdHtCZA6dkb9 axa27BT47fHL01A6hb3y0P8DSCaAOE75pf+HZ96oFSQ3LJHgO0K3jx359qzCiyv+lIHGj6T eeip6RzR9vjbAbU67ZgiQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:NNuESaTLrow=:Eu+TnfiBaxr1eZFGLSaWYC M9+IV1osB3q9nwW7xroWYmBeT/25FEHUJV0V1lmnIQLNu7HHF3NFLqUC68E2d5lGNdAf3ZSig QFOlynbH0m1efU4YI+yuHR2hXT5ioLwQ16u/Z2YsIipnQFcQseoLpZhERh6a/jZ6jxyurgw+e 8hqH7yCP8/XAy3dYf4NiyXMDErAMt8Lz6dRK7M+WLK9TiHrxe7IcKe56+PH48yAqIEIIR8+Vu YbvvSN4uuEkG1DjfpoF8BhMba/66ofhnbnPRdL0ZbnaBM6ZAIV7kfMEwUvC31C3nJ+10JxAnM 9ctkV5YRolS1R4kgSNI9bmwO9ecRWJRa8jeJZcSsMLE1mQpgiNDrYZ8reqcuMmKWVEyI/SEIB fLjvAYZfYVd2T8zczv6SmnvOmX81mM2YpnADKrnGwbdu46PB6BPtqexp0YOjklCTFFHIiIk2e oCwSlzPrKtX/5jerWcMCI3Eshyz9WmDJAELpJshdSw96awZpXUTFZnHX3vHY9GKm4WF6IBOYK +l1x87+1Z8IoTqNxAo/2KouS+mQC/61mMOSA5ylIhnKktLCT5gtW3VgzyboZETeyVduKaN75I 3127nzsIHZdDgwZdlXCuOUVrrW0h/AYCP9JsBKi1GnVqOwoywyW5es9uBI/Ar8wmxni/rovjg 1AG2fRSdaCpXnaAkMxqpkMDaX3/6F5/kJ5B0KAIh0BVxGf7E7TbYwc7XVYwfJzI6mfvKZD5Rj ZHO1XYYNe/rB6tpYwaUKEqp3RsgMQZgL+75urmNiShiK/2UbnYgplyN/JGGwmSF5LOjS5tRzw AIE8D3CFoi9PkW/TW3drxsK4zbCsPDz/jVGqSgrjg2oZt+DcOsS9mWX0JTi5Fxr6QFTMLE+86 ngZNqlIsdt0vU+Mh15bbFxunmpfVdcYZhbCQQCNe0/wmz5liVDVB1ShDvgrmxFDge+9m/I012 JmKP4jABZI/M+HFPuwOU/9CZiQ5jAgN5IDCNNHWxwRywAs6ZtXTZcQ7j/6R4q9ckyM8mXhsgb EheOYsWNovDULL3ol6/rOQFcTF+8PE2RD/lpwWsOFdX4k9oZN0kSmNu6sDqrg2Xh4pDV32Y2R BA1lJhTGSMwd0AbG1jzSuxLVTRqWxaXb3XzJrXY78I4PhGbK5DlFL+ROQ== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: Hi Lars, > I've now run a number of > > for i in `seq 1 40`; do make -j64 check; done > /tmp/j64.out 2>/tmp/j64.err > > variations, and it varies how much it fails. With -j4 and lower, it > never fails. With j8 to j16 it fails about 1 in 10 times, and with -j32 > it fails 40% of the time. (Take numbers with a grain of salt.) I have less cores in my laptop, so I have applied your code with -j8. It failed exactly one time. Not bad, so I'm able to reproduce it. > So there seems to be something racing with this test -- but only this > test. Pretty bizarre. I will instrument both the test function and file-in-directory-p in order to get more information about the reason. Don't expect results soon, these days I'm slow in working for Emacs. Best regards, Michael. From unknown Tue Jun 24 19:12:46 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#55706: 29.0.50; files test fails about 20% of the time Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 18:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55706 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Michael Albinus Cc: 55706@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 55706-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55706.16540210446609 (code B ref 55706); Tue, 31 May 2022 18:18:01 +0000 Received: (at 55706) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 May 2022 18:17:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48851 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nw6Qm-0001iW-Gp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2022 14:17:24 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58598) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nw6Qg-0001iF-0o for 55706@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2022 14:17:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+1GCaIhgkS2sKRsIUsPzN93sBoTD+B+xD6Z+nM0ElFQ=; b=CH+kwYpWuLJnpusJvD19uVoBgx LPGoBDlxZMxHpifKjEAal8O5eRCuvUwystZWprweCiF9rphp/KwUHt5vxqpY2tsvNqvIOYBkd1/oz Bxc+dBy3XfFioG8fpG9RtNBZPYGfuWbU7APZlyGmpG92KXZReUHoCe22qf6gcrtNlRZo=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nw6QX-0008UL-8J; Tue, 31 May 2022 20:17:11 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87ee0cz9d9.fsf@gnus.org> <878rqjvuci.fsf@gmx.de> <877d62an8e.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgiyuir1.fsf@gmx.de> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAgMAAAAqbBEUAAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAAAlQTFRF 3ufvRUxR////ksLprwAAAAFiS0dEAmYLfGQAAAAJcEhZcwAACxIAAAsSAdLdfvwAAAAHdElNRQfm BR8SCDgzKt8OAAAAXElEQVQoz83NMQ6AMAiFYV4iuwv36RFsUu5/FVvT4hts7GIi0/8NgMgvRxk2 hVODoQFksYAmeMBAkM0IuxNwo9TD2VN/ftSVgZYL0CmwBrlQGP4Ee0G3BqIa/DOcpDtIBG8aDNYA AABaZVhJZk1NACoAAAAIAAUBEgADAAAAAQABAAABGgAFAAAAAQAAAEoBGwAFAAAAAQAAAFIBKAAD AAAAAQACAAACEwADAAAAAQABAAAAAAAAAAAASAAAAAEAAABIAAAAAR9S9zQAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6 Y3JlYXRlADIwMjItMDUtMzFUMTg6MDg6NTYrMDA6MDAeX6FsAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAy MDIyLTA1LTMxVDE4OjA4OjU2KzAwOjAwbwIZ0AAAABd0RVh0ZXhpZjpZQ2JDclBvc2l0aW9uaW5n ADGsD4BjAAAAOHRFWHRpY2M6Y29weXJpZ2h0AENvcHlyaWdodCAoYykgMTk5OCBIZXdsZXR0LVBh Y2thcmQgQ29tcGFueflXeTcAAAAhdEVYdGljYzpkZXNjcmlwdGlvbgBzUkdCIElFQzYxOTY2LTIu MVet2kcAAAAmdEVYdGljYzptYW51ZmFjdHVyZXIASUVDIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuaWVjLmNoHH8ATAAA ADd0RVh0aWNjOm1vZGVsAElFQyA2MTk2Ni0yLjEgRGVmYXVsdCBSR0IgY29sb3VyIHNwYWNlIC0g c1JHQkRTSKkAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Floorplan's _Supernatural_: "Dance Floor" Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 20:17:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87zgiyuir1.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Tue, 31 May 2022 11:57:38 +0200") Message-ID: <87mtex5zyz.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Michael Albinus writes: > I have less cores in my laptop, so I have applied your code with -j8. It > failed exactly one time. Not bad, so I'm able to reproduce it. I was beginning to wonder whether it was just a problem on my build machine -- I couldn't reproduce it at all on my laptop (but the laptop is really slow compared to the build machine). Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Michael Albinus writes: > I have less cores in my laptop, so I have applied your code with -j8. It > failed exactly one time. Not bad, so I'm able to reproduce it. I was beginning to wonder whether it was just a problem on my build machine -- I couldn't reproduce it at all on my laptop (but the laptop is really slow compared to the build machine). >> So there seems to be something racing with this test -- but only this >> test. Pretty bizarre. > > I will instrument both the test function and file-in-directory-p in > order to get more information about the reason. Don't expect results > soon, these days I'm slow in working for Emacs. No problem. :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Tue Jun 24 19:12:46 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#55706: 29.0.50; files test fails about 20% of the time In-Reply-To: <87ee0cz9d9.fsf@gnus.org> Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2022 16:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55706 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 55706@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 55706-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55706.165410169928875 (code B ref 55706); Wed, 01 Jun 2022 16:42:02 +0000 Received: (at 55706) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jun 2022 16:41:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51728 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nwRPe-0007Vf-Pr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2022 12:41:39 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:45881) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nwRPc-0007VM-Ky for 55706@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2022 12:41:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1654101690; bh=+qpLEYebolHIvoW+ptx1Wsaa2xc8JwLWYZfvU6iv5Gg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date; b=Wfx0le0SqwGhR0PXy0Ow+93/3cajXsFXMwH9hMIfBxGllfHgVpKF+J6lrB2mqTCCF nmdDHqjHXskSR6HKDK82reVc9UMv0xc0DGAL1fF89PmWeGr6YnkeV2mvSzwY4o7nLL Z+307YOuXMDLbmR/0eeQuXgNJ8gBTxLB+wv40Vmg= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([79.140.125.156]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MdefJ-1nMpbv1MDB-00Zcc2; Wed, 01 Jun 2022 18:41:30 +0200 From: Michael Albinus References: <87ee0cz9d9.fsf@gnus.org> <878rqjvuci.fsf@gmx.de> <877d62an8e.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgiyuir1.fsf@gmx.de> <87mtex5zyz.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2022 18:41:28 +0200 Message-ID: <87a6awuyiv.fsf@gmx.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:meWzQVklSuosH41bf8YjKkLbX5fjlH73P1n+0C6leChI2CuTp1I 8fGvmOhsOyIq41Vvc7Ve0Gg3v1dGqag/rU1mjrycLGUQIJKW9q7H/8AZM5oy6CHO0VwTH3n WML+dYjlv3nndt/uxv1GivB1tWN+KsCNA+yyFa/NRvxbZPE9bGbtQJ7IWTxPkMyKqUZvS+p Zwd5asHBzfMVgPDInD8rg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Pmzz/RjI/VA=:H3zE9x8DagsrgcVxITF9Ay m8+CkvisPnEqIh793JnRmOYhQGkvAqGOHsEJWpjHJCj+QaZrb9bi6jHWL1eSl/K+foaMyWpCf xYlLw6fvr6YGmVfyzrplB/61Y2SiN67YW8DpP6ZrZujPxcnEu9pHYwbq1qsGxBBmSYXRYKKbl caCa0mlCd0TmnvKEc+0LTdhMsI+vpdtoXnozl3xYd9fbNglZ4pXQr+Rm0+K1imrEK7Ul+K+IM YMYNfNadsJE+n9msIkRl7MoLu3bEllttV4zqos/9W5uKaSkd/fk3fyNZ7i2YHN+dgH30YplaP UwKZK9G0Ztcqyt+AENNPTrQIiKLQR0krOptK89weDhHOmCphbUAUWT+rgO02Lfm47HPK7e2QR ee1qJJiDoHlSqGlND4gFSYnZuN77Lhd1AiJQd2AW72TttGfNsAHw6eeFpTDBi8ObxQ0YLma3n JSDINygpOvt9jfvH/HVRCHFduQCTJ5U4f6rYoI5RjshJbo//ANaWdQBa46/gdAo/jR36lIYBL CYGgjK9fYs+3brMTor2IxlfRAiW6DgtmzxWkAVTy7cmr3hVyx239zSU+yx4xqDjS6zg/DAIoB hlYNQuoWgxQXXIDlrXQKQh2v4x2SdrH2rQcu18eZb3aMd2IRZ7IAmtJkGSABvRWrh3fzB8ssG Ym7IiOdy4gQu9NBaLXuQ2AZE9EgtDfwXIs23bgTWBtWD2eQokcGcylXJqtsncRr/C0SERgMP6 uFz/pNrJYU5JXUkrpsYj7lqWpq47k6XFK/SSIt+bWkLAIjG4ST9dHhwtOrl1JxX142x7H1cls eJ6oBIminmhO6ulQiRA6Dl45IitmEauHQhWfMsSfMtJv9CU8bNAWyNojg1x1/0IsdbEvrq/aT WEMXGYx149Om4d7oM6Ca9waFibtGzH+U8/Cll8c78446OWvWQGs3sAMeUQxQcdl5IYkbWulWc xIHXO+D7KAS6On7RNhLWitTIjHiJH06oH2lsv1ZAqgmRzCvdpHUF7rMFZr8xmdu/fwFYiSTCP gkl4IwFtiZr9hXDd+VsLuk+3i8PsPF4A+h9tA8adeJ0dlr8ZezdterIech4t8gYf8xSf4lzIx kpr+ptjMtEpxY+hWTFUP3BS2r4iWCcTexqIseIGa7oHjwmK1HnFV15SVw== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: Hi Lars, >> I have less cores in my laptop, so I have applied your code with -j8. It >> failed exactly one time. Not bad, so I'm able to reproduce it. > > I was beginning to wonder whether it was just a problem on my build > machine -- I couldn't reproduce it at all on my laptop (but the laptop > is really slow compared to the build machine). Finally, I could catch it. file-in-directory-p calls at the very end (file-equal-p root dir), which is (file-equal-p "/tmp/" "/tmp/") in our test case. In file-equal-p, the file attributes of file1 and file2 are compared via equal, which means in the failing test --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (equal '(t 31 0 0 (25238 27804 344363 628000) (25238 27804 371363 598000) (25238 27804 371363 598000) 820 drwxrwxrwt t 1 37) '(t 31 0 0 (25238 27804 344363 628000) (25238 27804 372363 597000) (25238 27804 372363 597000) 800 drwxrwxrwt t 1 37) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- As you can see, the file attributes of "/tmp" are not equal. This is, because between the first and second call of file-attributes, "/tmp" has been changed due to the other test jobs running in parallel. I've fixed this by creating a subdirectory of "/tmp", using it as temporary-file-directory. Pushed to master. Could you, pls, check whether this works also on your build machine with -j64? For me it works w/o any problem, even with an iteration of 100 over "make -j8 check". Best regards, Michael. From unknown Tue Jun 24 19:12:46 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#55706: 29.0.50; files test fails about 20% of the time Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 11:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55706 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Michael Albinus Cc: 55706@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 55706-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55706.165416981914877 (code B ref 55706); Thu, 02 Jun 2022 11:37:02 +0000 Received: (at 55706) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jun 2022 11:36:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52949 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nwj8M-0003rt-OB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 07:36:58 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:49816) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nwj8K-0003rZ-Kl for 55706@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 07:36:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3uayj82JjDZ2IF1fl6QxeBww4Yh02Btap1pcSdmfe/0=; b=GkvLkHipRc96ALViPLjLbVIWyR kjTvp9aZ2Z4Rhh3oZhJQNoFfH4qX+DhQ2jBJNGiCWoz2fst98FKGjUjTnTZln5htArbtNX1D+85zE AAYH2mFXHDurSCldnqf7tkQFCsmYSCpljZCGMk8h3Pu0NNRuQlTOKSJJHx4F/P2HpTpM=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nwj8B-0006oY-Cc; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:36:49 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87ee0cz9d9.fsf@gnus.org> <878rqjvuci.fsf@gmx.de> <877d62an8e.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgiyuir1.fsf@gmx.de> <87mtex5zyz.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6awuyiv.fsf@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:36:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87a6awuyiv.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Wed, 01 Jun 2022 18:41:28 +0200") Message-ID: <871qw7z48h.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Michael Albinus writes: > As you can see, the file attributes of "/tmp" are not equal. This is, > because between the first and second call of file-attributes, "/tmp" has > been changed due to the other test jobs running in [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Michael Albinus writes: > As you can see, the file attributes of "/tmp" are not equal. This is, > because between the first and second call of file-attributes, "/tmp" has > been changed due to the other test jobs running in parallel. Heh. > I've fixed this by creating a subdirectory of "/tmp", using it as > temporary-file-directory. Pushed to master. Could you, pls, check > whether this works also on your build machine with -j64? For me it works > w/o any problem, even with an iteration of 100 over "make -j8 check". Thanks; I can confirm that the problem is gone on my main build machine after running with -j64 dozens of time. (Closing the bug report.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 02 07:37:13 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jun 2022 11:37:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52953 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nwj8a-0003sj-W6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 07:37:13 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:49830) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nwj8T-0003s1-AX for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 07:37:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=foXDrWLB/4xtmKDiiJvpMDkvpImJqmY2ru72JX6jFsk=; b=QP3QKq+BbyT8HHo/uLkx6KfJZ7 YqGrG1sRLXUK/Hj3Jkg3SFM2eOjItYHvhbzGwFo1JPLOwrTzxV2kUfvsNAz2PcwfB9WylNAqmFDQx 64rPsWa7EoARpCTxSRietL/xV180QDtm9xpY0UHdWKGLQpjjhHJJZlcZv3Yu99K4xioM=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nwj8L-0006om-CX for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:36:59 +0200 Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 13:36:56 +0200 Message-Id: <87zgivxpnr.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #55706 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 55706 29.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 55706 29.1 quit