GNU bug report logs - #55636
27.2; etags performance fix when working with very big TAGS files

Previous Next

Full log

Message #25 received at 55636 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: WAROQUIERS Philippe <philippe.waroquiers <at> eurocontrol.int>
Cc: 55636 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jurgen.de-backer.ext <at> eurocontrol.int,
 stef.van-vlierberghe <at> eurocontrol.int
Subject: Re: bug#55636: 27.2; etags performance fix when working with very big
 TAGS files
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 18:09:41 +0300

> From: WAROQUIERS Philippe <philippe.waroquiers <at> eurocontrol.int>
> CC: "DE BACKER Jurgen (EXT)" <jurgen.de-backer.ext <at> eurocontrol.int>,
> 	"55636 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <55636 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, VAN VLIERBERGHE Stef
> 	<stef.van-vlierberghe <at> eurocontrol.int>
> Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 14:54:04 +0000
> 
> So, I think the problem is just the size our 4 TAGS files:
> 
> One is about 62 MB, 914_000 lines, of those lines, about 59_000 are file names lines,
> another one  46 MB, 629_000 lines, also 59_000 file names lines.
> 
> We have 2 other smaller TAGS file (8MB and 9MB).
> 
> I have run emacs under valgrind --tool=callgrind.
> 
> valgrind points at expand-file-name eating significant cpu (see attachment).

I'm not sure I understand how to interpret that screenshot.

> I have also used the lisp profiler when loading the TAGS files.
> 
> 
> - call-interactively                                           10141  84%
>   - funcall-interactively                                       10077  84%
>    - find-tag                                                   10069  83%
>     - find-tag-noselect                                         10069  83%
>      - visit-tags-table-buffer                                   9584  79%
>       - tags-table-including                                     9578  79%
>        - tags-table-extend-computed-list                         4327  36%
>         - tags-verify-table                                      3274  27%
>          - apply                                                 3274  27%
>           - ad-Advice-tags-verify-table                          3274  27%

This says that most of the time is spent in tags-table-including.  If
you manually load etags.el (NOT .elc!), and then profile the same
operation, the profile could show in more detail which parts of
tags-table-including takes most of the time, and we can take it from
there.

Thanks.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.